We the People have just been handed among the greatest insults..

..in both law and soul of our persons ever in our history: “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act”

When the Supreme Court comprised of nine, Representatives from “We the People” -decided that The Majority shall declare right from wrong; they forgot it wasn’t about winning or losing, but about “The Republican form of government has its origins in Scripture” and “This philosophy asserts that there are moral absolutes: truths, such as those mentioned above, which are binding upon all Individuals at all times under all circumstances. This indicates some of the spiritual and moral values which are inherent in its concept of Individual Liberty-Responsibility... ..is an indivisible whole and must be accepted or rejected as such. It cannot be treated piece-meal. Its fundamentals and its implicit meanings and obligations must be accepted together with its benefits.”.

We know this.  It is evident that at least 4/9 Justices also know this.

What’s wrong comes from a couple of different, but connecting wrongs: First: All, 1947 forward, Article III, secular and precedent law is Supreme and,  over our Nation’s 1620 to this date - God’s Law as written in Both Declaration and Constitution, though secular members of We the People, in law – deny and forbid any countenance of Declaration Law as real when compared to the Constitution’s law.

Secular Law: “..In one sense, secularism may assert the right to be free from religious rule and teachings, and the right to freedom from governmental imposition of religion upon the people within a state that is neutral on matters of belief. (See also separation of church and state and Laïcité.) In another sense, it refers to the view that human activities and decisions, especially political ones, should be unbiased by religious influence.[1] (Wikipedia)

Precedent: “.. Legal rules, embodied in precedents, are generalizations that accentuate the importance of certain facts and discount or ignore others. The application of precedent relies on reasoning by analogy. Analogies can be neither correct nor incorrect but only more or less persuasive. Reasonable persons may come to different yet defensible conclusions about what rule should prevail. ..The judicial system maintains great fidelity to the application of precedents.”

Second: From this President and his background history, secular-precedent, Islamic law “Changes”; complete removal of  “The concept of Man's spiritual nature, and the resulting concept of the supreme dignity and value of each Individual, provide the fundamental basis for each Individual's self-respect and the consequent mutual respect among Individual's. This self-respect as well as this mutual respect are the outgrowth of, and evidenced by, The Individual's maintenance of his God-given, unalienable rights. They are maintained by requiring that government and other Individuals respect them, as well as by his dedication to his own unceasing growth toward realization of his highest potential--spiritually, morally, intellectually, in every aspect of life. This is in order that he may merit maximum respect by self and by others.”; And

Since he utilizes Saul L. Alinsky as his truth of governance, the following tactics are at work to keep “Patient Protection and Affordable Act” from being REPEALED:

3. "Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy. Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty. (This happens all the time. Watch how many organizations under attack are blind-sided by seemingly irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address.)
4. "Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules. You can kill them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity." [A great example of “We the People” falling for anything...  When they do not stand for principle.
8. "Keep the pressure on, with different tactics and actions, and utilize all events of the period for your purpose."
10. "The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition. It is this unceasing pressure that results in the reactions from the opposition that are essential for the success of the campaign."
11. "If you push a negative hard and deep enough, it will break through into its counterside... every positive has its negative." [this is the argument presented by Representatives of our Congress which says “There are Senators who like parts of PPAA and want to keep them..so won’t vote to Repeal for fear of losing the parts.  That’s the way it is in support of submission and subservience of Congress as well as Persons who shall be harmed by the PPAA lies.]
 13. Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.  In conflict tactics there are certain rules that [should be regarded] as universalities. One is that the opposition must be singled out as the target and 'frozen.'...
     "...any target can always say, 'Why do you center on me when there are others to blame as well?' When your 'freeze the target,' you disregard these [rational but distracting] arguments.... Then, as you zero in and freeze your target and carry out your attack, all the 'others' come out of the woodwork very soon. They become visible by their support of the target...' [This is the infamous ‘personality is much more important than content of issue’.  One never speaks of what a candidate will stand..., or conversely fall, for – compromising Constitutional “Rule of Law” is the rule... because it is right that laws like PPAA, “America’s financial Security Act”,  plastic bags, CO2 traded on Stock Exchange and fishies fliting in agricultural water requirements.]

Number 3 – is what “We the People” who are insulted ... perhaps a bit speechless.. Discouraged and just plain angry at the blatant disregard for “In a constitutional republic, the constitution is the supreme law, superior to all other public acts, whether by officials or private citizens. Any statute, regulation, executive order, or court ruling which is inconsistent with that supreme law and not derived from it is unconstitutional and null and void from inception.”

There is a lot more that can and will be said about this Anti-Law Act – both PPAA and the allowing a Majority to determine right and wrong:

“There is no maxim in my opinion which is more liable to be misapplied, and which therefore needs elucidation than the current [my italics] one that the interest of the majority is the political standard of right and wrong...In fact it is only reestablishing under another name and a more specious form, force as the measure o right..”(James Madison, 1786). ...”The Majority must be strictly limited in power, and in the operation of government, for the protection of the individual.. Under a Democracy, Man is considered to have only qualified privileges permitted by The Majority in control of government and revocable by it at any time.” (1976, Hubert Long in “The Twelve Basic American Principles”).

Americans, not sitting still for arrogance, conceit, denial of “Religion and Morality – here is what we Can Perform:
Like “Mr. Smith Goes to Washington”, literally have bags of letters, sent to the floor of the Senate — They need your identifier then the words “PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE ACT SHALL BE REPEALED IN ALL CONTENTS, INCLUDING COLLEGE GRANTS AND LOAN PROGRAMS.”

You can add whatever other parts of the insult you like..

But it is important to recognize the following reasons – which have absolutely nothing to do with healthcare in any manner – for unconstitutionality:
(1) It may be contrary to a right guaranteed under the Constitution. [Government doesn’t tell an individual what to purchase in commerce]
(2) It may not be based on one of the powers delegated to the government under the Constitution. [health care is not an enumerated power.  It does have a role, in the broader sense at the State Level; but given “We the People’s” TOTAL DEBT, not deficit, returning it to the States...solely with a division of that part of the Federal Budget which would apportion among the several States, the Medicare-caid $$$ available]
(3) It may violate the provisions for the structures and procedures of government, such as the delegation of legislative or judicial powers to an executive agency in violation of the separations o powers principle of the Constitution. [This is Michael Connelly’s, Texan Constitutionalist on Blog Radio – The Only Attorney To Read The Entire “America’s Affordable Care Act” the summer of 2009 — “This Act moves the greatest amount of money and power to one branch of government – Executive – than has ever occurred in the history of the United States.”] [This is the Number Two Reason, this Act is unconstitutional BEFORE you open the Title Page on the cover!!!!]
(4) It may neglect to perform some duty imposed under the Constitution. [Article II and VI – Oath of Office which is Not a Ceremony.  It is an Oath in complete accountability to God. It has as much weight in God’s Laws as obedience to the teachings and lessons of Scripture – accountability of “soul” after “body” of Person dies.]
(5) It may involve the operation of government outside it constitutional jurisdiction. [The complete control of all production and distribution of all goods and services required to deliver patient care...if the company receives government money in any business transaction indirectly; directly by determining which treatments and procedures will have greatest statistical use, with or without any R&D results for updating or improvement]
(6) It may not be applied in the way it was intended by those who wrote and adopted the original act. [Backdoor, pay backs, exceptions, unions as a class of citizen over equal rights of citizens, etc..]
(8) It may have been intended to be applied selectively, or have come to be applied selectively, in violation of the equal protection provision of the Constitution that all laws must be applied uniformly. [The inconsistent with supreme law is the formation of groups:  big group acute and chronically ill, is joined by the groups: statistical analysis for care application, all youth from embryo to 18,  healthy 19-50 years, production by private companies chemicals, machinery, software and hardware, surgical and laboratory equipment, lab supplies, cleanup and maintenance, safety and protection - staff and patient with visitors – “be quiet healing is at work” so you walk into a morgue known as hospital - and more...]
(9) Proper notice of the law or act my not have bees given in a way that would allow people [corporate persons] subject to it to become aware of it. [This expresses the now famous in United States Congressional History “We have to pass it to find out what it says!” of her majesty of minions - Pelosi]
(10) The aggregate of laws or regulations may become so burdensome that it becomes unreasonable for everyone subject to it to be sufficiently familiar with it to comply with all of it. [We the People, elected or not, have no idea what is in store for US(A)–do we? Though now we know that the $250,000 or less business owner who doesn’t have the Bush Tax Cut removed; shall have more than $250,000 in tax increase due to the Supreme Court’s “It Is A Tax!”]
(11) It may have never been properly adopted, or due process may not have been practiced. [This is NUMBER ONE reason of unconstitutionality; but it takes some knowledge of the 1828 definition of the words Congress, Assembly, Concert, Harmony, Measure, and the Republican Form of government – the Minority possess their equal rights which to violate would be oppression Use www.1828-dictionary.com , this will skip to the chase..  Article I:7 clause 1 and 2 state that before a Bill goes to the President, it shall have passed both House and Senate.

PPAA was not signed by any Republican Member of both House and Senate. It was also not signed by 27 members of the Democratic Party.  That means that every citizen of the Republican Party of the United States by District and by at least 50% of State’s with Republican Senators, also did not sign Patient Protection and Affordable Act. That also includes the Citizens of House Districts and the Senate from the Democratic Party did Not Sign the Patient Protection and Affordable Act into Law; And

that means “..to concert measures of common concern..” did not occur!  The parallel example was called “filibuster” of the above movie “Mr Smith Goes to Washington” – “No Majority, however great even all of the people but one Individual— may properly infringe, or possess the power to infringe, the rights of any minority, however small — even a minority of a lone Individual. Thomas Jefferson said it this way: “..though the will of the majority is in all cases to prevail, that will to be rightful must be reasonable...”.

The Majority of Obama’s minions in both Houses — with the President— signed a Bill into Law which was and is blatantly unconstitutional...

These Representatives of “We the People’” lied under Oath of Office, in fact and action in law... regarding the Patient Protection and Affordable Act.”.

That is the reason PPAA Must be Completely REPEALED. Otherwise “I entirely concur in the propriety of resorting to the sense in which the Constitution was accepted and ratified by the nation....If the meaning of the text be sought in the changeable meaning of the words composing it, it is evident that the shape and attributes of the Government must partake of the changes to which the words and phrases of all living languages are constantly subject. What a metamorphosis would be produced in the code of law if all its ancient phraseology were to be taken in it modern sense.” James Madison 1824
(12) Information needed to make a proper determination may have been withheld or distorted in a way that is intended to mislead or which has that effect through negligence. [Pelosi’s statement, joined in agreement by representative, socialists of both Houses, Is a Statement of negligence and irresponsibility]

“An unconstitutional statue is not a law, no matter how vigorously it may be enforced. Enforcement does not make what is enforced the law. What is enforced is a regime. In a constitutional republic, the law and the regime should coincide. If they do not, the regime is not law but anti-law.”

“The judgement of the consistency of an official act with the constitution is called “constitutional review”. When this duty is performed by a judge, it is called ‘judicial review’. It is not a power of government but the exercise of a duty of citizenship.”

PLEASE WRITE YOUR LETTERS and Email your Friends and Family.  Do Not Forget to Address Both Socialist Senators from our State of California!