We the People of God and Nation First are "the standard bearer for Republican Party - conservatism in our Republic under God: "..But in summing up, let us make sure we know what is meant by "conservatism" -- exactly what the conservative philosophy stands for..."; and Ronald Reagan, though he, like too many Americans, did misunderstand and mistake "Democracy" for our archetypal Republican form of Representative government, campaigned for Senator Goldwater and expresses these views "We always must ask: Is government working to liberate and empower the individual? Is it creating incentives for people to produce, save, invest, and profit from legitimate risks and honest toil? Is it encouraging all of us to reach for the stars? Or does it seek to compel, command, and coerce people into submission and dependence? Ask these questions, because no matter where you look today, you will see that deveolpment depends on economic freedom."-- Address to World affairs Council of Philadelphia, October 15, 1981
"First, conservatives are not limited to the Republican Party. They are found in increasing numbers throughout the Nation, wherever thinking people take a long, hard look at the [50 year nearing catastrophe] 30 year trend toward centralization of power and decision-making in Washington.
What the conservatives seek is not a counter-revolution ---nor at headlong dash back to the 19th century --- but a brake on Federal expansion. Led by Sen. Goldwater [only We the People in 2014, for our party-leadership has deserted its tenets - though RNC is asking for your input. (Having trouble finding the link it is not apparent at the website)], they believe there Is an alternative to the relentless course toward an authoritarian state, a course that has seriously imperiled individual liberty. What is more, this alternative is intellectually respectable and economically workable.
The conservative believes in a restoration of balance between government and individual powers. .."
[though right now, a full-blown-dictatorship with administrative-police-state writing, enforcing and colluding with the other 15, 16 is news-slave to the tongue of falsehood, for the dictator's cabinets; so only Article II:4 is Truth of, by, for consent of the governed and We the People: "You Cannot serve both God and Mammon" ]
"This is neither negative nor backward; it is positive and "Progressive. ..[meaning a. Moving forward; proceeding onward; advancing; as progressive motion or course; opposed to retrograde. 1. Improving. The arts are in a progressive state."]. .."
[Progressive, like "sick", is one of the black is white if the WASP/UDHR-Obama-socialist-atheist decrees it so. "Retrograde means 1. Going or moving backwards. 2. In astronomy, apparently moving backward and contrary to the succession of the signs, as a planet. 3. Declining from a better to a worse state. RET'ROGRADE, v.i. [L. retrogradior; retro and gradior, to go.] To go or move backward. So, when Americans of God and Nation First are referring to the Progressive Republican Leadership, we are addressing 'retrograde-robo-think of kingship, emperor, no truth and only human precept exists for all decreed and dictated behaviors especially against the good and honest American and all individual persons on God's Planet.]
"..For in the final analysis Only Individual Initiative promotes, as no state domination ever can, the general and material and spiritual welfare. Both history and the course of every state-dominated country in the world today rove this to be true.
The creative forces of our economy of free and competitive enterprise are Individual forces ["And assume among the powers of the earth.."]. THIS IS OUR HERITAGE. BY VIRTUE OF IT, OUR NATION HAS FLOURISHED LIKE NO OTHER IN HISTORY. It will continue to flourish as long as this same basic institution --- Individual Freedom--- .."
["..the separate and equal station to which The Laws of Nature and of Nature's God Entitle One People for the purpose of demonstrating and establishing, enabling Among the Certain Unalienable Natural Rights" to occur. Those two entire sentences are the entire world of Absolute Love of God to each-one-of your own unique, immortal-soul, in body - which comprise "Person" of Constitutional Law, magnificent Gifts of His Everlasting Presence]
"..is our guiding principle. We the People of God and Nation First ["Barry Goldwater is..; Ronald Reagan Is... George W. Bush Is... Michele Bachmann Is..; John Boehner Is..; Sarah Palin Is..; Ron Paul..Is; and others who still have a bit of 'learning to complete" hopefully assisted by Barry and Ronald, Tom and James, George and John, Ben and Alexander..] are dedicated to preserving that principle."
--- So, please Help US(A) my/our Lord God -- Christ are waiting...and working....Barry Goldwater is here; the Founders are here; and most importantly You - reading this is Here... and you are no longer "socialist progressive-republican word's 'Members of the Choir' " --- You Are One, Very Important Person of Soul, Person - Part of the "Whole of the Polity" which you help define: of, by, and for yourself, those you love and those you know, and those you will never know...most especially among the Youth from kindergarten through sophistry, graduate school of human precept completely absent wisdom, knowledge, Truth... and Article III Judicial -- abandonment of Justice; for there is no Justice unless God's Law is The Supreme Law of the Land.
Tuesday, February 25, 2014
Monday, February 24, 2014
to Hundreds of Republicans under Hundreds of Names...being defeated by cherry-picking size, shape, color, texture
- Conversation started today
- Conversation started today
---The judgement of the consistency of an official act with the constitution is called constitutional review. When this duty is performed by a judge, it is called judicial review. It is not a power of government but the exercise of a duty of citizenship." at http://www.constitution.org/consprin.htm.
Person is composed of Body, physiology to which neurology and anatomy depend for earthly journey, and Your, Person, Alone, unique, Immortal-Soul, also no physical or environmental characteristics, or UDHR's collective "personality;" and "separate and equal station.." connecting to "Laws of Nature and of Nature's God which is The Gospel, Paul, church's first Administrator, realized "not a religion, but Religion itself": Your Person of Religion and Morality which is indispensable and the Reason "One Person Protected from government-over-man, a.k.a John Adams "A government of laws, and not of men.," a.k.a "It is not what enters his mouth that defiles him; what defiles a man is what comes out of his mouth." also known as unsound judgement, human precept/ precedent-relative truth of part of a Whole. The harmony in Logic in which The Constitution of the United States of America is Applied and sealed in Testimony and Attestation through Articles II and VI Oath of Office, each one person, from among the Whole of both consent of the governed to protect the above; and We the People to guide, mentor, in Religion and morality of both Politics and Party:
"POLITICS The science of government; that part of ethics which consists in the regulation and government of a nation or state, for the preservation of its safety, peace and prosperity; comprehending the defense of its existence and rights against foreign control or conquest, the augmentation of its strength and resources, and the protection of its citizens in their rights, with the preservation and improvement of their morals. Politics, as a science or an art, is a subject of vast extent and importance."
"PARTY 1. A number of persons united in opinion or design, in opposition to others in the community. It differs from faction, in implying a less dishonorable association, or more justifiable designs. Parties exist in all governments; and free governments are the hot-beds of party. Formerly, the political parties in England were called whigs and tories."
To which, brings US(A) back to Your individual person as One Part of the Whole of the Polity called UNITED States of America who, alone, is accountable to, in our Republican Form of REPRESENTATIVE GOVERNMENT, himself -Pledge or Oath, to those you loves and knows, and to those you will never know which includes Posterity whether single or not, in every role you take in your life, liberty, and pursuit of Happiness, which for the Colonists, Founders among them, was following Christ to the best of their abilities -----
Have your ever counted the hundreds of groups within What Should Be Our Republican Party of Principle --- The Republic under God?
As Long as We the People of God and Nation First, refuse to thwart the Progressive's wolf wearing sheepskin within our Party - is as long as the father evil-father lie (John 8) will remain to uproot the Cherry Tree to destroy its disunited, cherries (groups divided into sections of violations of the Laws of the Three Sacred Documents). Teapartiers - Independents - Libertarians - disenfranchised Democrats of God and Nation First - naturalized or natural citizens.
Many tout being Conservative, the firm and strong root of that tree reflecting America's good and honest man -- affirmed, ratified, and practiced for 393 years, but have no idea what those principles are composed of. Well, Barry Goldwater spoke at State Convention. His father was my first opportunity to give 'consent of the governed' and with my mother, a renegade of the first order for righteousness in politics and in education - learning, we worked among our friends --- and everyone knew, from the Founders to that 1964 year, that what has happened with the Obama, atheist, Socialist, human precept/no truth or trust, Anti-law Regime would occur, exactly as it has....
Mr. Goldwater may have his father's campaign material... I do and it is an excellent statement of position to return our Nation to its foundation and cornerstone. I have already placed Education and other topics on my blog; have offered it to candidates and to our Party -- The Whole of Our Party: http://declarationandconstitutionspeak.blogspot.com/2013/10/senator-barry-goldwater-on-government.html
--- If you
Don't Attend to absent "politics", then your silence is agreement (see The Sentinel in Ezekiel 33, a Chapter George Washington used! You must attend -- and not only that --- You Must Demand "Roberts Rules of Order" for H. Clinton-Obama Lucifer Alinsky's Delphi has dictated that "time" and "speaker" are supreme, and You Must Be Dummy-downed - too in Your "Opinion without Interference" - Though you interfere in established and demonstrated Truth.
Delphi is what every single unit of every name, has been badly fooled by "Lets use the Devil's deck of cards to defeat the devil!" -- Jeff McDermott's "make Obama live up to his own tactics".... NO! We the People work with Only The Laws of The Three Sacred Documents. The Constitution Is Not An Isolated Document - contrary to the decree of Article III Judiciary; and "In disquisitions of every kind there are certain primary truths, or first principles, upon which all subsequent reasoning must depend. These contain an internal evidence which, antecedent to all reflection or combination, commands the assent of the mind [heart, soul, conscience in love of God]"Alexander Hamilton, Federalist #31: The Three Sacred Documents written by man in The name of Our Eternal, Everlasting, Patient Father who made Each-One-Person in His Image/Soul and in His Love, Jesus Christ, our King of Kings, Savior, Counselor, and wonderful Friend.
Those of you who have "No Supreme Lawgiver, Creator of the Universe -- The Lord God and His son DO NOT FORCE any person; and this is reflected through our Republic give you your Person of individual choice - free agency WITH ITS CONSEQUENCES - Liberty, but You May Not Force Your, alone, or among your group-think-people "Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers (Article 19 UDHR)," boundary, jurisprudence by tearing apart the "Whole" in the belief you can "serve both God and Mammon - earthly person absent "opinion's probability of truth or falsehood" is never based in wisdom, sound judgement, knowledge, or truth and therefore the other 29 Articles of UDHR become falsehoods of "human family"
many of our posterity have been indoctrinated to expect as life for that is what they have been subjected to under state-federal destruction, neglect, omission, commission, positive transgression.
Sunday, February 23, 2014
Administrative-Police-state continues violations of The Three Sacred Documents, especially Person of Oath
WE WILL NOT BE SILENCED:
Right now is your chance to be heard. The IRS has proposed new regulations that will suppress citizen groups from discussing issues and actions that our nation's political leaders take in D.C. We must remember, the IRS admitted to inappropriate targeting of groups because of their conservative or religious beliefs. They are now trying to write such abusive tactics into the tax code.
In the future, if we do not speak out, these proposed IRS regulations will encourage the blatant targeting of opposition groups by an unaccountable federal bureaucracy. They will also allow groups such as the Sierra Club or Common Cause to be shut down and hushed should their opponents be elected to presidency. It is important to note that many heavy-hitters in Washington, D.C. including the tax exempt AFL-CIO, U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Rockefeller Foundation are not touched by these proposed regulations as they focus solely on stopping the political speech of groups that provide a voice to everyday Americans.
Your voice matters. By law, the IRS must consider each comment that is submitted. We are stronger together than we are apart.
Must Submit by February 27, 2014 Must Reference Citation: IRS REG-134417-13email from Catherine Englebrecht, True The Vote:
Submitted 2/23/14 9:00 pm as Official Docket:
Article IV:4 The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion. Invasion means "A hostile entrance into the possessions of another; particularly, the entrance of a hostile army into a country for the purpose of conquest or plunder; as well as "2. An attack on the rights of another; infringement or violation.".
Persons, as "officials of government" are bound by Article VI Oath of Office: "Oath means A solemn affirmation or declaration, made with an appeal to God for the truth of what is affirmed. The appeal to God in an oath, implies that the person imprecates his vengeance and renounces his favor if the declaration is false, or if the declaration is a promise, the person invokes the vengeance of God if he should fail to fulfill it. A false oath is called perjury," and official malfeasance -failure of duty of office; that is " Whenever any person is confronted with a situation in which two or more official acts are in conflict, he has the duty to know which is the superior one, and to obey or help enforce the superior one, which, if one of them is the constitution, means to obey or help enforce the constitution. This duty cannot be delegated to another person: not to a superior, a court, or a legal adviser. It is not a defense that one was ignorant of the law or just doing one's job or following orders. This is sometimes called the Principle of Nuremberg," and also includes God's Laws, i.e Thou shalt not steal, i.e. Plunder & collusion and The Declaration's Laws: "And assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God, entitle One People; and
Specifically from Declaration's abuses: "Article II's dictatorship, administrative-state has erected a multitude of New Offices 30,405 [tax supported]GAO, and sent hither swarms of [tax-supported]Officers to harrass Consent of the Governed and We the People, and eat out their substance, 4,427,673 [Tax-supported]* Fed. Employees w. [tax supported] Pension Debt $231,174,300,000.00". "Article II- taxpayer funded, administrative-state IRS/Treasury has Colluded in deceit** with Taxpayer-financed, Dept. of Homeland Security's 'Right Wing Extremism: Current Economical and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment' to subject US(A) to a jurisdiction foreign to our Pledge to our Republic based upon & under Laws of God - The Laws of Declaration and of Constitution ..giving arbitrary force of law, absent resulting in IRS allowed to assess penalties affecting Life, Liberty, and Happiness through violations of the Laws of Nature's God. Speaking Constitutionally: 1) Violates Amendment I: parts 2 freedom of speech; 4 peaceably to assemble, and 5 petition the Government for Redress of grievances; Amendment VIII "..nor excessive fines imposed.."; Amendment IX: The Right of Property: "..In the former sense, a man's land, or merchandize, or money is called his property. --In the latter sense, a man has a property in his opinions and the free communication of them. --He has a property very dear to him in the safety and liberty of his person. --He has an equal property in the free use of his faculties and free choice of the objects on which to employ them. --Where an excess of power prevails, property of no sort is duly respected.No man is safe in his opinions, his person, his faculties, or his possessions --Government is instituted to protect property of every sort; as well that which lies in the various rights of individuals, as that which the term particularly expresses. This being the end of government, that alone is a just government, which impartially secures to every man, whatever is his own.
--According to this standard of merit, the praise of affording a just securing to property, should be sparingly bestowed on a government which, however scrupulously guarding the possessions of individuals, does not protect them in the enjoyment and communication of their opinions, in which they have an equal, and in the estimation of some, a more valuable property."
--A just security to property is not afforded by that government, under which unequal taxes oppress one species of property and reward another species: where arbitrary taxes invade the domestic sanctuaries of the rich, and excessive taxes grind the faces of the poor; where the keenness and competitions of want are deemed an insufficient spur to labor, and taxes are again applied, by an unfeeling policy, as another spur; in violation of that sacred property, which Heaven, in decreeing man to earn his bread by the sweat of his brow, kindly reserved to him, in the small repose that could be spared from the supply of his necessities." at
http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/v1ch16s23.html
IRS, is not Government of the people, by the people, or for the people.You, employee are as accountable to God in your, unique, immortal-soul for your person of Honor in duty and service; as I am or any person in our Nation - Yes, that does mean God and Nation First. No you shall not suppress speech.
*Adminstrative-Police-state: Dr. John Marini in ”Budget Battles and the Growth of the Administrative State”: “..marked the beginning of an expansion the federal government an a centralization of political and administrative power in Washington that had long been the domain of local and State governments. In addition to destroying the fabric of Federalism, this centralization had the effect of undermining the separation of powers, making it difficult if not impossible for Congress, the president, and the bureaucracy to function ‘amicably’ in pursuit of national interest. What we have seen in subsequent decades is the steady expansion of a modern administrative state that is distinctively American in this it coexists with a limited government Constitution.”. at http://imprimis.hillsdale.edu/file/archives/pdf/2013_10_Imprimis.pdf
Friday, February 21, 2014
Thomas Jefferson letter to Judge William Johnson June 12 1823
It is always enlightening and immensely rewarding to read our Founders in their own words, especially in this current "course of human events", WASP - Obama Socialist, Atheist, Anti-Three Sacred Documents Regime" to favor Matt. 15: 1-20's "doctrines they teach are but human precepts...Listen, understand this: it is not what enters a man's mouth that defiles him; what defiles a man is what comes our out his mouth..".
Mr. Jefferson's letter isn't at all about 'defiling'; but at the same time, Party, Politics, One People vs Tories, now socialist belief in supreme power, religion of atheism by centralized, dictated force by servitude, subordination, and perpetuating lie in learning kindergarten throughout the entire lifespan adulthood, especially in relation to the moral government of God of The Three Sacred Documents, this letter addresses the entire "comes out of his mouth, human precept, no truth, administrative-police-state; "communities", of "human family" to which "everyBody" has duties in order for his, alone, full development of 'personality':
"To Justice William Johnson Monticello, June 12, 1823
The Letters of Thomas Jefferson DEAR SIR,
-- Our correspondence is of that accommodating character, which admits of suspension at the convenience of either party, without inconvenience to the other. Hence this tardy acknowledgment of your favor of April the 11th. I learn from that with great pleasure, that you have resolved on continuing your history of parties. Our opponents are far ahead of us in preparations for placing their cause favorably before posterity. Yet I hope even from some of them the escape of precious truths, in angry explosions or effusions of vanity, which will betray the genuine monarchism of their principles. They do not themselves believe what they endeavor to inculcate, that we were an opposition party, not on principle, but merely seeking for office. The fact is, that at the formation of our government, many had formed their political opinions on European writings and practices, believing the experience of old countries, and especially of England, abusive as it was, to be a safer guide than mere theory. The doctrines of Europe were, that men in numerous associations cannot be restrained within the limits of order and justice, but by forces physical and moral, wielded over them by authorities independent of their will. Hence their organization of kings, hereditary nobles, and priests. Still further to constrain the brute force of the people, they deem it necessary to keep them down by hard labor, poverty and ignorance, and to take from them, as from bees, so much of their earnings, as that unremitting labor shall be necessary to obtain a sufficient surplus barely to sustain a scanty and miserable life. And these earnings they apply to maintain their privileged orders in splendor and idleness, to fascinate the eyes of the people, and excite in them an humble adoration and submission, as to an order of superior beings. Although few among us had gone all these lengths of opinion, yet many had advanced, some more, some less, on the way. And in the convention which formed our government, they endeavored to draw the cords of power as tight as they could obtain them, to lessen the dependence of the general functionaries on their constituents, to subject to them those of the States, and to weaken their means of maintaining the steady equilibrium which the majority of the convention had deemed salutary for both branches, general and local. To recover, therefore, in practice the powers which the nation had refused, and to warp to their own wishes those actually given, was the steady object of the federal party. Ours, on the contrary, was to maintain the will of the majority of the convention, and of the people themselves. We believed, with them, that man was a rational animal, endowed by nature with rights, and with an innate sense of justice; and that he could be restrained from wrong and protected in right by moderate powers, confided to persons of his own choice, and held to their duties by dependence on his own will. We believed that the complicated organization of kings, nobles, and priests, was not the wisest nor best to effect the happiness of associated man; that wisdom and virtue were not hereditary, that the trappings of such a machinery, consumed by their expense, those earnings of industry, they were meant to protect, and, by the inequalities they produced, exposed liberty to sufferance. We believed that men, enjoying in ease and security the full fruits of their own industry, enlisted by all their interests on the side of law and order, habituated to think for themselves, and to follow their reason as their guide, would be more easily and safely governed, than with minds nourished in error, and vitiated and debased, as in Europe, by ignorance, indigence and oppression. The cherishment of the people then was our principle, the fear and distrust of them, that of the other party. Composed, as we were, of the landed and laboring interests of the country, we could not be less anxious for a government of law and order than were the inhabitants of the cities, the strongholds of federalism. And whether our efforts to save the principles and form of our constitution have not been salutary, let the present republican freedom, order and prosperity of our country determine. History may distort truth, and will distort it for a time, by the superior efforts at justification of those who are conscious of needing it most. Nor will the opening scenes of our present government be seen in their true aspect, until the letters of the day, now held in private hoards, shall be broken up and laid open to public view. What a treasure will be found in General Washington's cabinet, when it shall pass into the hands of as candid a friend to truth as he was himself! When no longer, like Caesar's notes and memorandums in the hands of Anthony, it shall be open to the high priests of federalism only, and garbled to say so much, and no more, as suits their views!
With respect to his farewell address, to the authorship of which, it seems, there are conflicting claims, I can state to you some facts. He had determined to decline re-election at the end of his first term, and so far determined, that he had requested Mr. Madison to prepare for him something valedictory, to be addressed to his constituents on his retirement. This was done, but he was finally persuaded to acquiesce in a second election, to which no one more strenuously pressed him than myself, from a conviction of the importance of strengthening, by longer habit, the respect necessary for that office, which the weight of his character only could effect. When, at the end of his second term, his Valedictory came out, Mr. Madison recognized in it several passages of his draught, several others, we were both satisfied, were from the pen of Hamilton, and others from that of the President himself. These he probably put into the hands of Hamilton to form into a whole, and hence it may all appear in Hamilton's hand-writing, as if it were all of his composition.
I have stated above, that the original objects of the federalists were, 1st, to warp our government more to the form and principles of monarchy, and, 2d, to weaken the barriers of the State governments as coordinate powers. In the first they have been so completely foiled by the universal spirit of the nation, that they have abandoned the enterprise, shrunk from the odium of their old appellation, taken to themselves a participation of ours, and under the pseudo-republican mask, are now aiming at their second object, and strengthened by unsuspecting or apostate recruits from our ranks, are advancing fast towards an ascendancy. I have been blamed for saying, that a prevalence of the doctrines of consolidation would one day call for reformation or revolution. I answer by asking if a single State of the Union would have agreed to the constitution, had it given all powers to the General Government? If the whole opposition to it did not proceed from the jealousy and fear of every State, of being subjected to the other States in matters merely its own? And if there is any reason to believe the States more disposed now than then, to acquiesce in this general surrender of all their rights and powers to a consolidated government, one and undivided?
You request me confidentially, to examine the question, whether the Supreme Court has advanced beyond its constitutional limits, and trespassed on those of the State authorities? I do not undertake it, my dear Sir, because I am unable. Age and the wane of mind consequent on it, have disqualified me from investigations so severe, and researches so laborious. And it is the less necessary in this case, as having been already done by others with a logic and learning to which I could add nothing. On the decision of the case of Cohens vs. The State of Virginia, in the Supreme Court of the United States, in March, 1821, Judge Roane, under the signature of Algernon Sidney, wrote for the Enquirer a series of papers on the law of that case. I considered these papers maturely as they came out, and confess that they appeared to me to pulverize every word which had been delivered by Judge Marshall, of the extra-judicial part of his opinion; and all was extra-judicial, except the decision that the act of Congress had not purported to give to the corporation of Washington the authority claimed by their lottery law, of controlling the laws of the States within the States themselves. But unable to claim that case, he could not let it go entirely, but went on gratuitously to prove, that notwithstanding the eleventh amendment of the constitution, a State could be brought as a defendant, to the bar of his court; and again, that Congress might authorize a corporation of its territory to exercise legislation within a State, and paramount to the laws of that State. I cite the sum and result only of his doctrines, according to the impression made on my mind at the time, and still remaining. If not strictly accurate in circumstance, it is so in substance. This doctrine was so completely refuted by Roane, that if he can be answered, I surrender human reason as a vain and useless faculty, given to bewilder, and not to guide us. And I mention this particular case as one only of several, because it gave occasion to that thorough examination of the constitutional limits between the General and State jurisdictions, which you have asked for. There were two other writers in the same paper, under the signatures of Fletcher of Saltoun, and Somers, who, in a few essays, presented some very luminous and striking views of the question. And there was a particular paper which recapitulated all the cases in which it was thought the federal court had usurped on the State jurisdictions. These essays will be found in the Enquirers of 1821, from May the 10th to July the 13th. It is not in my present power to send them to you, but if Ritchie can furnish them, I will procure and forward them. If they had been read in the other States, as they were here, I think they would have left, there as here, no dissentients from their doctrine. The subject was taken up by our legislature of 1821 - '22, and two draughts of remonstrances were prepared and discussed. As well as I remember, there was no difference of opinion as to the matter of right; but there was as to the expediency of a remonstrance at that time, the general mind of the States being then under extraordinary excitement by the Missouri question; and it was dropped on that consideration. But this case is not dead, it only sleepeth. The Indian Chief said he did not go to war for every petty injury by itself, but put it into his pouch, and when that was full, he then made war. Thank Heaven, we have provided a more peaceable and rational mode of redress.
It was between a citizen and his own State, and under a law of his State. It was a domestic case, therefore, and not a foreign one.
Can it be believed, that under the jealousies prevailing against the General Government, at the adoption of the constitution, the States meant to surrender the authority of preserving order, of enforcing moral duties and restraining vice, within their own territory? And this is the present case, that of Cohen being under the ancient and general law of gaming. Can any good be effected by taking from the States the moral rule of their citizens, and subordinating it to the general authority, or to one of their corporations, which may justify forcing the meaning of words, hunting after possible constructions, and hanging inference on inference, from heaven to earth, like Jacob's ladder? Such an intention was impossible, and such a licentiousness of construction and inference, if exercised by both governments, as may be done with equal right, would equally authorize both to claim all power, general and particular, and break up the foundations of the Union. Laws are made for men of ordinary understanding, and should, therefore, be construed by the ordinary rules of common sense. Their meaning is not to be sought for in metaphysical subtleties, which may make anything mean everything or nothing, at pleasure. It should be left to the sophisms of advocates, whose trade it is, to prove that a defendant is a plaintiff, though dragged into court, torto collo, like Bonaparte's volunteers, into the field in chains, or that a power has been given, because it ought to have been given, et alia talia. The States supposed that by their tenth amendment, they had secured themselves against constructive powers. They were not lessoned yet by Cohen's case, nor aware of the slipperiness of the eels of the law. I ask for no straining of words against the General Government, nor yet against the States. I believe the States can best govern our home concerns, and the General Government our foreign ones. I wish, therefore, to see maintained that wholesome distribution of powers established by the constitution for the limitation of both; and never to see all offices transferred to Washington, where, further withdrawn from the eyes of the people, they may more secretly be bought and sold as at market.
But the Chief Justice says, "there must be an ultimate arbiter somewhere." True, there must; but does that prove it is either party? The ultimate arbiter is the people of the Union, assembled by their deputies in convention, at the call of Congress, or of two-thirds of the States. Let them decide to which they mean to give an authority claimed by two of their organs. And it has been the peculiar wisdom and felicity of our constitution, to have provided this peaceable appeal, where that of other nations is at once to force.
I rejoice in the example you set of seriatim opinions. I have heard it often noticed, and always with high approbation. Some of your brethren will be encouraged to follow it occasionally, and in time, it may be felt by all as a duty, and the sound practice of the primitive court be again restored. Why should not every judge be asked his opinion, and give it from the bench, if only by yea or nay? Besides ascertaining the fact of his opinion, which the public have a right to know, in order to judge whether it is impeachable or not, it would show whether the opinions were unanimous or not, and thus settle more exactly the weight of their authority.
The close of my second sheet warns me that it is time now to relieve you from this letter of unmerciful length. Indeed, I wonder how I have accomplished it, with two crippled wrists, the one scarcely able to move my pen, the other to hold my paper. But I am hurried sometimes beyond the sense of pain, when unbosoming myself to friends who harmonize with me in principle. You and I may differ occasionally in details of minor consequence, as no two minds, more than two faces, are the same in every feature. But our general objects are the same, to preserve the republican form and principles of our constitution and cleave to the salutary distribution of powers which that has established. These are the two sheet anchors of our Union. If driven from either, we shall be in danger of foundering.
To my prayers for its safety and perpetuity, I add those for the continuation of your health, happiness, and usefulness to your country."
Mr. Jefferson's letter isn't at all about 'defiling'; but at the same time, Party, Politics, One People vs Tories, now socialist belief in supreme power, religion of atheism by centralized, dictated force by servitude, subordination, and perpetuating lie in learning kindergarten throughout the entire lifespan adulthood, especially in relation to the moral government of God of The Three Sacred Documents, this letter addresses the entire "comes out of his mouth, human precept, no truth, administrative-police-state; "communities", of "human family" to which "everyBody" has duties in order for his, alone, full development of 'personality':
"To Justice William Johnson Monticello, June 12, 1823
The Letters of Thomas Jefferson DEAR SIR,
-- Our correspondence is of that accommodating character, which admits of suspension at the convenience of either party, without inconvenience to the other. Hence this tardy acknowledgment of your favor of April the 11th. I learn from that with great pleasure, that you have resolved on continuing your history of parties. Our opponents are far ahead of us in preparations for placing their cause favorably before posterity. Yet I hope even from some of them the escape of precious truths, in angry explosions or effusions of vanity, which will betray the genuine monarchism of their principles. They do not themselves believe what they endeavor to inculcate, that we were an opposition party, not on principle, but merely seeking for office. The fact is, that at the formation of our government, many had formed their political opinions on European writings and practices, believing the experience of old countries, and especially of England, abusive as it was, to be a safer guide than mere theory. The doctrines of Europe were, that men in numerous associations cannot be restrained within the limits of order and justice, but by forces physical and moral, wielded over them by authorities independent of their will. Hence their organization of kings, hereditary nobles, and priests. Still further to constrain the brute force of the people, they deem it necessary to keep them down by hard labor, poverty and ignorance, and to take from them, as from bees, so much of their earnings, as that unremitting labor shall be necessary to obtain a sufficient surplus barely to sustain a scanty and miserable life. And these earnings they apply to maintain their privileged orders in splendor and idleness, to fascinate the eyes of the people, and excite in them an humble adoration and submission, as to an order of superior beings. Although few among us had gone all these lengths of opinion, yet many had advanced, some more, some less, on the way. And in the convention which formed our government, they endeavored to draw the cords of power as tight as they could obtain them, to lessen the dependence of the general functionaries on their constituents, to subject to them those of the States, and to weaken their means of maintaining the steady equilibrium which the majority of the convention had deemed salutary for both branches, general and local. To recover, therefore, in practice the powers which the nation had refused, and to warp to their own wishes those actually given, was the steady object of the federal party. Ours, on the contrary, was to maintain the will of the majority of the convention, and of the people themselves. We believed, with them, that man was a rational animal, endowed by nature with rights, and with an innate sense of justice; and that he could be restrained from wrong and protected in right by moderate powers, confided to persons of his own choice, and held to their duties by dependence on his own will. We believed that the complicated organization of kings, nobles, and priests, was not the wisest nor best to effect the happiness of associated man; that wisdom and virtue were not hereditary, that the trappings of such a machinery, consumed by their expense, those earnings of industry, they were meant to protect, and, by the inequalities they produced, exposed liberty to sufferance. We believed that men, enjoying in ease and security the full fruits of their own industry, enlisted by all their interests on the side of law and order, habituated to think for themselves, and to follow their reason as their guide, would be more easily and safely governed, than with minds nourished in error, and vitiated and debased, as in Europe, by ignorance, indigence and oppression. The cherishment of the people then was our principle, the fear and distrust of them, that of the other party. Composed, as we were, of the landed and laboring interests of the country, we could not be less anxious for a government of law and order than were the inhabitants of the cities, the strongholds of federalism. And whether our efforts to save the principles and form of our constitution have not been salutary, let the present republican freedom, order and prosperity of our country determine. History may distort truth, and will distort it for a time, by the superior efforts at justification of those who are conscious of needing it most. Nor will the opening scenes of our present government be seen in their true aspect, until the letters of the day, now held in private hoards, shall be broken up and laid open to public view. What a treasure will be found in General Washington's cabinet, when it shall pass into the hands of as candid a friend to truth as he was himself! When no longer, like Caesar's notes and memorandums in the hands of Anthony, it shall be open to the high priests of federalism only, and garbled to say so much, and no more, as suits their views!
With respect to his farewell address, to the authorship of which, it seems, there are conflicting claims, I can state to you some facts. He had determined to decline re-election at the end of his first term, and so far determined, that he had requested Mr. Madison to prepare for him something valedictory, to be addressed to his constituents on his retirement. This was done, but he was finally persuaded to acquiesce in a second election, to which no one more strenuously pressed him than myself, from a conviction of the importance of strengthening, by longer habit, the respect necessary for that office, which the weight of his character only could effect. When, at the end of his second term, his Valedictory came out, Mr. Madison recognized in it several passages of his draught, several others, we were both satisfied, were from the pen of Hamilton, and others from that of the President himself. These he probably put into the hands of Hamilton to form into a whole, and hence it may all appear in Hamilton's hand-writing, as if it were all of his composition.
I have stated above, that the original objects of the federalists were, 1st, to warp our government more to the form and principles of monarchy, and, 2d, to weaken the barriers of the State governments as coordinate powers. In the first they have been so completely foiled by the universal spirit of the nation, that they have abandoned the enterprise, shrunk from the odium of their old appellation, taken to themselves a participation of ours, and under the pseudo-republican mask, are now aiming at their second object, and strengthened by unsuspecting or apostate recruits from our ranks, are advancing fast towards an ascendancy. I have been blamed for saying, that a prevalence of the doctrines of consolidation would one day call for reformation or revolution. I answer by asking if a single State of the Union would have agreed to the constitution, had it given all powers to the General Government? If the whole opposition to it did not proceed from the jealousy and fear of every State, of being subjected to the other States in matters merely its own? And if there is any reason to believe the States more disposed now than then, to acquiesce in this general surrender of all their rights and powers to a consolidated government, one and undivided?
You request me confidentially, to examine the question, whether the Supreme Court has advanced beyond its constitutional limits, and trespassed on those of the State authorities? I do not undertake it, my dear Sir, because I am unable. Age and the wane of mind consequent on it, have disqualified me from investigations so severe, and researches so laborious. And it is the less necessary in this case, as having been already done by others with a logic and learning to which I could add nothing. On the decision of the case of Cohens vs. The State of Virginia, in the Supreme Court of the United States, in March, 1821, Judge Roane, under the signature of Algernon Sidney, wrote for the Enquirer a series of papers on the law of that case. I considered these papers maturely as they came out, and confess that they appeared to me to pulverize every word which had been delivered by Judge Marshall, of the extra-judicial part of his opinion; and all was extra-judicial, except the decision that the act of Congress had not purported to give to the corporation of Washington the authority claimed by their lottery law, of controlling the laws of the States within the States themselves. But unable to claim that case, he could not let it go entirely, but went on gratuitously to prove, that notwithstanding the eleventh amendment of the constitution, a State could be brought as a defendant, to the bar of his court; and again, that Congress might authorize a corporation of its territory to exercise legislation within a State, and paramount to the laws of that State. I cite the sum and result only of his doctrines, according to the impression made on my mind at the time, and still remaining. If not strictly accurate in circumstance, it is so in substance. This doctrine was so completely refuted by Roane, that if he can be answered, I surrender human reason as a vain and useless faculty, given to bewilder, and not to guide us. And I mention this particular case as one only of several, because it gave occasion to that thorough examination of the constitutional limits between the General and State jurisdictions, which you have asked for. There were two other writers in the same paper, under the signatures of Fletcher of Saltoun, and Somers, who, in a few essays, presented some very luminous and striking views of the question. And there was a particular paper which recapitulated all the cases in which it was thought the federal court had usurped on the State jurisdictions. These essays will be found in the Enquirers of 1821, from May the 10th to July the 13th. It is not in my present power to send them to you, but if Ritchie can furnish them, I will procure and forward them. If they had been read in the other States, as they were here, I think they would have left, there as here, no dissentients from their doctrine. The subject was taken up by our legislature of 1821 - '22, and two draughts of remonstrances were prepared and discussed. As well as I remember, there was no difference of opinion as to the matter of right; but there was as to the expediency of a remonstrance at that time, the general mind of the States being then under extraordinary excitement by the Missouri question; and it was dropped on that consideration. But this case is not dead, it only sleepeth. The Indian Chief said he did not go to war for every petty injury by itself, but put it into his pouch, and when that was full, he then made war. Thank Heaven, we have provided a more peaceable and rational mode of redress.
This practice of Judge Marshall, of travelling out of his case to prescribe what the law would be in a moot case not before the court, is very irregular and very censurable. I recollect another instance, and the more particularly, perhaps, because it in some measure bore on myself. Among the midnight appointments of Mr. Adams, were commissions to some federal justices of the peace for Alexandria. These were signed and sealed by him, but not delivered. I found them on the table of the department of State, on my entrance into office, and I forbade their delivery. Marbury, named in one of them, applied to the Supreme Court for a mandamus to the Secretary of State, (Mr. Madison) to deliver the commission intended for him. The court determined at once, that being an original process, they had no cognizance of it; and therefore the question before them was ended. But the Chief Justice went on to lay down what the law would be, had they jurisdiction of the case, to wit: that they should command the delivery. The object was clearly to instruct any other court having the jurisdiction, what they should do if Marbury should apply to them. Besides the impropriety of this gratuitous interference, could anything exceed the perversion of law? For if there is any principle of law never yet contradicted, it is that delivery is one of the essentials to the validity of the deed. Although signed and sealed, yet as long as it remains in the hands of the party himself, it is in fieri only, it is not a deed, and can be made so only by its delivery. In the hands of a third person it may be made an escrow. But whatever is in the executive offices is certainly deemed to be in the hands of the President; and in this case, was actually in my hands, because, when I countermanded them, there was as yet no Secretary of State. Yet this case of Marbury and Madison is continually cited by bench and bar, as if it were settled law, without any animadversion on its being merely an obiter dissertation of the Chief Justice.It may be impracticable to lay down any general formula of words which shall decide at once, and with precision, in every case, this limit of jurisdiction. But there are two canons which will guide us safely in most of the cases. 1st. The capital and leading object of the constitution was to leave with the States all authorities which respected their own citizens only, and to transfer to the United States those which respected citizens of foreign or other States: to make us several as to ourselves, but one as to all others. In the latter case, then, constructions should lean to the general jurisdiction, if the words will bear it; and in favor of the States in the former, if possible to be so construed. And indeed, between citizens and citizens of the same State, and under their own laws, I know but a single case in which a jurisdiction is given to the General Government. That is, where anything but gold or silver is made a lawful tender, or the obligation of contracts is any otherwise impaired. The separate legislatures had so often abused that power, that the citizens themselves chose to trust it to the general, rather than to their own special authorities. 2d. On every question of construction, carry ourselves back to the time when the constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or invented against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed. Let us try Cohen's case by these canons only, referring always, however, for full argument, to the essays before cited.
It was between a citizen and his own State, and under a law of his State. It was a domestic case, therefore, and not a foreign one.
Can it be believed, that under the jealousies prevailing against the General Government, at the adoption of the constitution, the States meant to surrender the authority of preserving order, of enforcing moral duties and restraining vice, within their own territory? And this is the present case, that of Cohen being under the ancient and general law of gaming. Can any good be effected by taking from the States the moral rule of their citizens, and subordinating it to the general authority, or to one of their corporations, which may justify forcing the meaning of words, hunting after possible constructions, and hanging inference on inference, from heaven to earth, like Jacob's ladder? Such an intention was impossible, and such a licentiousness of construction and inference, if exercised by both governments, as may be done with equal right, would equally authorize both to claim all power, general and particular, and break up the foundations of the Union. Laws are made for men of ordinary understanding, and should, therefore, be construed by the ordinary rules of common sense. Their meaning is not to be sought for in metaphysical subtleties, which may make anything mean everything or nothing, at pleasure. It should be left to the sophisms of advocates, whose trade it is, to prove that a defendant is a plaintiff, though dragged into court, torto collo, like Bonaparte's volunteers, into the field in chains, or that a power has been given, because it ought to have been given, et alia talia. The States supposed that by their tenth amendment, they had secured themselves against constructive powers. They were not lessoned yet by Cohen's case, nor aware of the slipperiness of the eels of the law. I ask for no straining of words against the General Government, nor yet against the States. I believe the States can best govern our home concerns, and the General Government our foreign ones. I wish, therefore, to see maintained that wholesome distribution of powers established by the constitution for the limitation of both; and never to see all offices transferred to Washington, where, further withdrawn from the eyes of the people, they may more secretly be bought and sold as at market.
But the Chief Justice says, "there must be an ultimate arbiter somewhere." True, there must; but does that prove it is either party? The ultimate arbiter is the people of the Union, assembled by their deputies in convention, at the call of Congress, or of two-thirds of the States. Let them decide to which they mean to give an authority claimed by two of their organs. And it has been the peculiar wisdom and felicity of our constitution, to have provided this peaceable appeal, where that of other nations is at once to force.
I rejoice in the example you set of seriatim opinions. I have heard it often noticed, and always with high approbation. Some of your brethren will be encouraged to follow it occasionally, and in time, it may be felt by all as a duty, and the sound practice of the primitive court be again restored. Why should not every judge be asked his opinion, and give it from the bench, if only by yea or nay? Besides ascertaining the fact of his opinion, which the public have a right to know, in order to judge whether it is impeachable or not, it would show whether the opinions were unanimous or not, and thus settle more exactly the weight of their authority.
The close of my second sheet warns me that it is time now to relieve you from this letter of unmerciful length. Indeed, I wonder how I have accomplished it, with two crippled wrists, the one scarcely able to move my pen, the other to hold my paper. But I am hurried sometimes beyond the sense of pain, when unbosoming myself to friends who harmonize with me in principle. You and I may differ occasionally in details of minor consequence, as no two minds, more than two faces, are the same in every feature. But our general objects are the same, to preserve the republican form and principles of our constitution and cleave to the salutary distribution of powers which that has established. These are the two sheet anchors of our Union. If driven from either, we shall be in danger of foundering.
To my prayers for its safety and perpetuity, I add those for the continuation of your health, happiness, and usefulness to your country."
Monday, February 17, 2014
Anti-The Three Sacred Documents - Neighborhood Legislatures
Consent of the governed to protect Each-One-Constitutional Person's Rights of Property expressed in Declaration "the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle One People IN ORDER TO EXERCISE the Certain Unalienable Natural Rights from The Creator....In our Republic under God "--- The individual component of the polity is the person, which is defined as any being consisting of or having the essential cognitive attributes of a member of the species homo sapiens, including BOTH the capacity to compete with others for the means to exercise the natural rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, AND the capacity to regulate its competitive actions to avoid depriving others of those rights and to sacrifice itself for the greater good of the polity as a whole or for their common posterity." There are no physical or environmental descriptions of Person - which is related to Scripture" God Created man in His image" --- Soul.
Person is composed of body traveling earthly journey in their unique, immortal Soul; and our archetypal Republican Form of Representative Government - Protects each-one-Person's Soul, for body is an living object..Soul is what law is written to protect in all rights - not just "among these..."; and that protection is secured by each-one--person who volunteers from among We the People to be a candidate or incumbent for office, or appointed, or Any Person who works in any level as an official of Government- the entire Equilateral Triangle of Organization. Those persons, within the entire structure of government ARE ALL BOUND BY ARTICLE II;1, CLAUSE 8 and ARTICLE VI OATH OF OFFICE - each-one-person's unique, immortal Soul in Promise to stand, preserve, protect The Laws of the Three Sacred Documents -- and God is Witness to that Oath... at http://1828.mshaffer.com/d/word/soul and same with 'person'
---The polity, or society, is created by the Social Contract, in which persons agree to join together for mutual benefit and defense, and to regulate their behavior to avoid forms of competition which are destructive of social coherence and effectiveness, such as violence, deception, or collusion, or to infringe on the rights of others." at http://www.constitution.org/consprin.htm
This is a review and/or new information regarding the sacred nature of God's Laws including His Laws of Nature ...our Archetypal THE ONLY NATION IN THE HISTORY OF MANKIND TO SAY MAN IS MADE IN GOD'S IMAGE; "I AM IN MY FATHER. MY FATHER IS IN ME. I AM IN YOU. YOU ARE IN ME. OBEY MY COMMANDS. ASK, SEEK, KNOCK AND ALL WILL BE OPENED UNTO YOU.
It is necessary to say this because everyone is picking little cherries off the cherry tree; while the Cherry Tree itself is being burned, spit upon, and destroyed by the WASP - Obama Socialist, Atheist, "Climate change", PPAA of Every-one-American's healthy or ill life, Anti-Three Sacred Documents Regime". WASP is the World Atheist Socialist Properties, UN-Agenda 21/UNESCO/WSIS, human precept, Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) where there is no person and every body reports to his community, human family, which alone, allows full development of his personality..and opinion without interference of Truth is a right regardless of frontier, boundaries, or jurisprudence...
Though Mr. Cox does not understand what "Socialism is involved in Cloward-Piven and H. Clinton-Obama Lucifer Alinsky, nor does the Republican party for that matter; his "neighborhood districts" create yet another destruction, spit-upon 'consent of the governed' -- disorganization by tearing apart into where your home is located determines your right to run for office; and creates little, tiny, clumps of number and location determined by 'local committee-group-think" - socialist cells, no doubt utilizing Alinsky's Delphi Technique which no Republican, Teapartier, or independent recognizes as "Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers"Article 19 UDHR), boundaries, jurisprudence, borderless nations and jurisprudence. Opinion is Not Truth --- not even relative truth since lie, as it is well known within our FB format -- is actually the human precept of all official behavior in every level of government, in Common Core curriculum to guarantee ignorance of our Posterity who shall learn obedience in brain-washing by indoctrination...
Here's how:
As this cursor blinks, there are more than 18 to 22 different Kinds of Districts in every One of the 58 counties within 433 cities and rural precincts. These are layered, upon layers, something like 12 or 14 layers, in order to juggle the software, written by invisible, unaccountable writers who know nothing about our Republic under God... . Add this to the Voter ID you are not to be assumed an honest person -- you must present ID to vote; then
Add CA Constitution, Article II:5(a)(b) top two vote getters regardless of political party affiliation/unless the party is Socialist; "Citizens Redistricting Commission"; gerrymandered districts; cities forced through despoil in coercion to form districts by skin-color-except white; country of origin - except the USA the naturalized citizen has given his word of honor, in Pledge of Allegiance to stand, support and preserve - the rights of Each-One Person as "consent of the governed" in the English language - the language of consent of the governed and We the People; and school/city districts where no citizen of the city is allowed a voice in 100% of either school board or city government and Non-partisan, like budget "ceiling" are meaningless words, unless used for the purpose of dereliction of duty -- failure in office -- failure to uphold Oath of Office at http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/official+misconduct.
An honest vote --- dream on! Republicans, the lesser, minor party -- even given its further division because of ignorance of leadership in how 1947 and 1971 Clinton--Obama-Lucifer Alinsky, a la Jeff McDermott -- has fooled so many otherwise smart people; who forget to line up the "Sermon on the Mount" and The Ten Commandments as side-by-side to "lucifer - The Devil - father evil-father lie - the slayer of men from the beginning in John 8. Yes, our nation is formed on The Christian Gospel --- and the Founder's meant exactly what they wrote; for the only way One Person can be protected is if God's Laws form the basis, cornerstone, and foundation of "Government of law and not of man"--John Adams
-- The Social Contract in which lie, deceit, violence, collusion, coercion, deception and infringement of Person's right Is The Socialist, Human Precept Rules of Behavior...No Constitutional Person can run for any office within a city or rural area, unless his home is properly situated -- but the Mayor is allowed to have 100% of the citizens of the city vote... An egregious eradication of our Article 4:4 Republican Form of Government -- completely absent Article V, VI, and VII -- as well as CA Constitution Article XX:3 -- take a look at CA's Oath of Office for government of, by, and for the people! Please bear-in-mind, there is no Federal Government to obtain the guarantee for enforcement...is there?! Home is an inanimate, indifferent-object which is not supreme to person and cannot be a party at law, except Socialist-atheist-human precept rules of behavior: "Only individual persons or corporate "persons" which are composed of individual persons may be the subject of legal process. Inanimate objects and living objects not capable of conducting their own defense in a court of law may not be parties to an action at law.".
Consent of the Governed, the Laws of the Declaration of Independence, is being fragmented and torn into so many pieces, that destruction of informed citizen voter is obliterated.
Neighborhood Legislatures are the Cloward-Piven of Socialism taken attack, by "disorganization" into so many parts --- the Individual One Person Protected from Socialist government - government-over-man, that our Article IV:4 will cease -- that is The Three Sacred Documents are null and void by overthrow in despotism by the Obama Atheist, socialist, human precept, great and sacred-vain-idol-god, Majority of despoil and enslave the individual and in a federal community to make a similar sacrifice of the minority of the component States.
No Person of our Republic under God shall benefit by Mr. Cox's, neighborhood districts" grapes from thorns or figs from thistles - except the WASP and Obama Socialist Regime -- which by the way is actually "state infringing on the definition of "church:
1. A house consecrated to the worship of God, among Christians; the Lords house. This seems to be the original meaning of the word. The Greek, to call out or call together, denotes an assembly or collection. But, Lord, a term applied by the early Christians to Jesus Christ; and the house in which they worshipped was named from the title. So church goods, bona ecclesiastica; the Lords day, dies dominica.
2. The collective body of Christians, or of those who profess to believe in Christ, and acknowledge him to be the Savior of mankind. In this sense, the church is sometimes called the Catholic or Universal Church.
3. A particular number of christens, united under one form of ecclesiastical government, in one creed, and using the same ritual and ceremonies; as the English church; the Gallican church; the Presbyterian church; the Romish church; the Greek church.
9. The collective body of Christians, who have made a public profession of the Christian religion, and Who are Untied Under the Same Pastor [a Person who has not joined a denomination/ ecclesiastics]; in distinction from those who belong to the same parish, or ecclesiastical society, but have made no profession of their faith.
Person is composed of body traveling earthly journey in their unique, immortal Soul; and our archetypal Republican Form of Representative Government - Protects each-one-Person's Soul, for body is an living object..Soul is what law is written to protect in all rights - not just "among these..."; and that protection is secured by each-one--person who volunteers from among We the People to be a candidate or incumbent for office, or appointed, or Any Person who works in any level as an official of Government- the entire Equilateral Triangle of Organization. Those persons, within the entire structure of government ARE ALL BOUND BY ARTICLE II;1, CLAUSE 8 and ARTICLE VI OATH OF OFFICE - each-one-person's unique, immortal Soul in Promise to stand, preserve, protect The Laws of the Three Sacred Documents -- and God is Witness to that Oath... at http://1828.mshaffer.com/d/word/soul and same with 'person'
---The polity, or society, is created by the Social Contract, in which persons agree to join together for mutual benefit and defense, and to regulate their behavior to avoid forms of competition which are destructive of social coherence and effectiveness, such as violence, deception, or collusion, or to infringe on the rights of others." at http://www.constitution.org/consprin.htm
This is a review and/or new information regarding the sacred nature of God's Laws including His Laws of Nature ...our Archetypal THE ONLY NATION IN THE HISTORY OF MANKIND TO SAY MAN IS MADE IN GOD'S IMAGE; "I AM IN MY FATHER. MY FATHER IS IN ME. I AM IN YOU. YOU ARE IN ME. OBEY MY COMMANDS. ASK, SEEK, KNOCK AND ALL WILL BE OPENED UNTO YOU.
It is necessary to say this because everyone is picking little cherries off the cherry tree; while the Cherry Tree itself is being burned, spit upon, and destroyed by the WASP - Obama Socialist, Atheist, "Climate change", PPAA of Every-one-American's healthy or ill life, Anti-Three Sacred Documents Regime". WASP is the World Atheist Socialist Properties, UN-Agenda 21/UNESCO/WSIS, human precept, Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) where there is no person and every body reports to his community, human family, which alone, allows full development of his personality..and opinion without interference of Truth is a right regardless of frontier, boundaries, or jurisprudence...
Though Mr. Cox does not understand what "Socialism is involved in Cloward-Piven and H. Clinton-Obama Lucifer Alinsky, nor does the Republican party for that matter; his "neighborhood districts" create yet another destruction, spit-upon 'consent of the governed' -- disorganization by tearing apart into where your home is located determines your right to run for office; and creates little, tiny, clumps of number and location determined by 'local committee-group-think" - socialist cells, no doubt utilizing Alinsky's Delphi Technique which no Republican, Teapartier, or independent recognizes as "Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers"Article 19 UDHR), boundaries, jurisprudence, borderless nations and jurisprudence. Opinion is Not Truth --- not even relative truth since lie, as it is well known within our FB format -- is actually the human precept of all official behavior in every level of government, in Common Core curriculum to guarantee ignorance of our Posterity who shall learn obedience in brain-washing by indoctrination...
Here's how:
As this cursor blinks, there are more than 18 to 22 different Kinds of Districts in every One of the 58 counties within 433 cities and rural precincts. These are layered, upon layers, something like 12 or 14 layers, in order to juggle the software, written by invisible, unaccountable writers who know nothing about our Republic under God... . Add this to the Voter ID you are not to be assumed an honest person -- you must present ID to vote; then
Add CA Constitution, Article II:5(a)(b) top two vote getters regardless of political party affiliation/unless the party is Socialist; "Citizens Redistricting Commission"; gerrymandered districts; cities forced through despoil in coercion to form districts by skin-color-except white; country of origin - except the USA the naturalized citizen has given his word of honor, in Pledge of Allegiance to stand, support and preserve - the rights of Each-One Person as "consent of the governed" in the English language - the language of consent of the governed and We the People; and school/city districts where no citizen of the city is allowed a voice in 100% of either school board or city government and Non-partisan, like budget "ceiling" are meaningless words, unless used for the purpose of dereliction of duty -- failure in office -- failure to uphold Oath of Office at http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/official+misconduct.
An honest vote --- dream on! Republicans, the lesser, minor party -- even given its further division because of ignorance of leadership in how 1947 and 1971 Clinton--Obama-Lucifer Alinsky, a la Jeff McDermott -- has fooled so many otherwise smart people; who forget to line up the "Sermon on the Mount" and The Ten Commandments as side-by-side to "lucifer - The Devil - father evil-father lie - the slayer of men from the beginning in John 8. Yes, our nation is formed on The Christian Gospel --- and the Founder's meant exactly what they wrote; for the only way One Person can be protected is if God's Laws form the basis, cornerstone, and foundation of "Government of law and not of man"--John Adams
-- The Social Contract in which lie, deceit, violence, collusion, coercion, deception and infringement of Person's right Is The Socialist, Human Precept Rules of Behavior...No Constitutional Person can run for any office within a city or rural area, unless his home is properly situated -- but the Mayor is allowed to have 100% of the citizens of the city vote... An egregious eradication of our Article 4:4 Republican Form of Government -- completely absent Article V, VI, and VII -- as well as CA Constitution Article XX:3 -- take a look at CA's Oath of Office for government of, by, and for the people! Please bear-in-mind, there is no Federal Government to obtain the guarantee for enforcement...is there?! Home is an inanimate, indifferent-object which is not supreme to person and cannot be a party at law, except Socialist-atheist-human precept rules of behavior: "Only individual persons or corporate "persons" which are composed of individual persons may be the subject of legal process. Inanimate objects and living objects not capable of conducting their own defense in a court of law may not be parties to an action at law.".
Consent of the Governed, the Laws of the Declaration of Independence, is being fragmented and torn into so many pieces, that destruction of informed citizen voter is obliterated.
Neighborhood Legislatures are the Cloward-Piven of Socialism taken attack, by "disorganization" into so many parts --- the Individual One Person Protected from Socialist government - government-over-man, that our Article IV:4 will cease -- that is The Three Sacred Documents are null and void by overthrow in despotism by the Obama Atheist, socialist, human precept, great and sacred-vain-idol-god, Majority of despoil and enslave the individual and in a federal community to make a similar sacrifice of the minority of the component States.
No Person of our Republic under God shall benefit by Mr. Cox's, neighborhood districts" grapes from thorns or figs from thistles - except the WASP and Obama Socialist Regime -- which by the way is actually "state infringing on the definition of "church:
1. A house consecrated to the worship of God, among Christians; the Lords house. This seems to be the original meaning of the word. The Greek, to call out or call together, denotes an assembly or collection. But, Lord, a term applied by the early Christians to Jesus Christ; and the house in which they worshipped was named from the title. So church goods, bona ecclesiastica; the Lords day, dies dominica.
2. The collective body of Christians, or of those who profess to believe in Christ, and acknowledge him to be the Savior of mankind. In this sense, the church is sometimes called the Catholic or Universal Church.
3. A particular number of christens, united under one form of ecclesiastical government, in one creed, and using the same ritual and ceremonies; as the English church; the Gallican church; the Presbyterian church; the Romish church; the Greek church.
9. The collective body of Christians, who have made a public profession of the Christian religion, and Who are Untied Under the Same Pastor [a Person who has not joined a denomination/ ecclesiastics]; in distinction from those who belong to the same parish, or ecclesiastical society, but have made no profession of their faith.
Saturday, February 15, 2014
1788 - Letter of Benjamin Rush to David Ramsay - Against Simple Democracies and Bills of Rights
Columbian Herald (Charleston, S.C.), April 19, 1788
Extract of a letter from Dr. RUSH, of Philadelphia, lately received by gentleman of this city.
DEAR SIR,
“I presume before this time you have heard, and rejoiced in the auspicious events of the ratification of the federal government by six of the United States.
“The objections which have been urged against the federal constitution from its wanting a bill of rights, have been reasoned and ridiculed out of credit in every state that has adopted it. There can be only two sureties for liberty in any government, viz. representation and checks.
By the first, the rights of the people, and by the second, the rights of representation are effectually
secured. Every part of a free constitution hangs upon these two points, and these form the two capital features of the proposed constitution of the United States. Without them, a volume of rights would avail nothing, and with them a declaration of rights is absurd and unnecessary; for the PEOPLE where their liberties are committed to an equal representation, and to a compound legislature (such as we observe in the new government) will always be the sovereigns of their rulers, and hold all their rights in their own hands. To hold them at the mercy of their servants, is disgraceful to the dignity of freemen. Men who call for a bill of rights, have not recovered from the habits they acquired under the monarchical government of Great-Britain.
“I have the same opinion with the antifederalists of the danger of trusting arbitrary power to any single body of men; but no such power will be committed to our new rulers. Neither the house of representatives, the senate, or the president can perform a single legislative act by themselves. An hundred principles in man will lead them to watch, to check and to oppose each other, should an attempt be made by either of them upon the liberties of the people. If we may judge of their conduct, by what we have so often observed in all the state governments, the members of the federal legislature will much oftener injure their constituents by voting agreeably to their inclinations, than against them.
“But are we to consider men entrusted with power as the receptacles of all the depravity of human nature? By no means. The people do not part with their full proportions of it. Reason and revelation both deceive us, if they are all wise and virtuous. Is not history as full of the vices of the people, as it is of the crimes of the kings? what is the present moral character of the citizens of the United States? I need not discover it. It proves too plainly, that the people are as much disposed to vice as their rulers, and that nothing but a vigorous and efficient government can prevent their degenerating into savages, or devouring each other like beasts of prey.
“A simple democracy, has been very aptly compared by Mr. Ames of Massachusetts, to a volcano that contained within its bowels the fiery materials of its own destruction. A citizen of one of the Cantons of Switzerland in the year 1776, refused to drink in my presence “the commonwealth of America” as a toast, and gave as a reason for it, “that a simple democracy was the devil’s own government.”—The experience of the American states under the present confederation has in too many instances justified these two accounts of a simple popular government.
“It would have been a truth, if Mr. Locke had not said it, that where there is no law, there can be no liberty, and nothing deserves the name of law but that which is certain, and universal in its operation upon all the members of the community.
“To look up to a government that establishes justice, insures order, cherishes virtue, secures property, and protects from every species of violence, affords a pleasure, that can only be exceeded by looking up in all circumstances to an overuling providence.—Such a pleasure I hope is before us, and our posterity under the influence of the new government.
“The dimensions of the human mind, are apt to be regulated by the extent and objects of the government under which it is formed. Think then my friend, of the expansion and dignity the American mind will acquire, by having its powers transferred from the contracted objects of a state to the unbounded objects of a national government!—A citizen and a legislator of the free and UNITED STATES of America, will be one of the first characters in the world.
“I would not have you suppose, after what I have written, that I believe the new government to be without faults. I can see them, but not in any of the writings or speeches of any of the persons who are opposed to it. But who ever saw any thing perfect come from the hands of man? It realises notwithstanding in a great degree, every wish I ever entertained in every stage of the revolution for the happiness of my country, for you know that I have acquired no new opinions on principles upon the subject of republics, by the sorrowful events we have lately witnessed in America.—In the year 1776, I lost the confidence of the people of Pennsylvania, by openly exposing the dangers of a simple democracy, and declaring myself an advocate for a government composed of three legislative branches.
“Adieu—from dear sir, yours sincerely.”
As is true of the Founders, and Colonists, this letter is sage - even in its 'Trust' of government more than The People.
Remember the word "Democracy" is synonymous with Socialism which since January 20, 2009 adds the words atheist and human precept rules of behavior to "nothing deserves the name of law"
-- No Truth - No Trust - - therefore No Justice -- and licentiousness pervades all branches and administrative-police-state of Executive dictatorship --- just like abuses - among the lessons of the Declaration; noting that many of those abuses do not require the alteration of one word - in their exact tyranny, usurpation, and oppression -- long since resulting in despotism....and no longer sufferable either; for now babes-in-arms will be the recipients of despoiling and enslavement....
Having said this, were it not for Speaker Boehner and the minority of Republican Party minority -- refusing to bow to the great and sacred-vain-idol-god, Majority of arbitrary force and control; We the People would have already lost -- and may have given the per taxpaying citizen debt share $191,709 plus interest $8,148 on a Gross National Debt 60,873,739,000,000 + growing by millisecond. You need to visit .http://www.usdebtclock.org/index.html and as you do...
Remember We the People have completely opposed PPAA/H.Clinton's Universal Healthcare over the last 19 years; there is Not One Republican, House or Senate, Signature to Law on PPAA ; and 4 Justices of the Supreme Court eradicated PPAA, thus completing that the 'very reverent supplication to the great and sacred-vain-idol-god, Majority' literally forcing it down our - each-one-person's throat in the interest of despoil and enslave --- thus reflecting " ...Without them, a volume of rights would avail nothing, .... where there is no law, there can be no liberty, and nothing deserves the name of law but that which is certain, and universal in its operation upon all the members of the community. ..". There are no Three Sacred Documents -
Extract of a letter from Dr. RUSH, of Philadelphia, lately received by gentleman of this city.
DEAR SIR,
“I presume before this time you have heard, and rejoiced in the auspicious events of the ratification of the federal government by six of the United States.
“The objections which have been urged against the federal constitution from its wanting a bill of rights, have been reasoned and ridiculed out of credit in every state that has adopted it. There can be only two sureties for liberty in any government, viz. representation and checks.
By the first, the rights of the people, and by the second, the rights of representation are effectually
secured. Every part of a free constitution hangs upon these two points, and these form the two capital features of the proposed constitution of the United States. Without them, a volume of rights would avail nothing, and with them a declaration of rights is absurd and unnecessary; for the PEOPLE where their liberties are committed to an equal representation, and to a compound legislature (such as we observe in the new government) will always be the sovereigns of their rulers, and hold all their rights in their own hands. To hold them at the mercy of their servants, is disgraceful to the dignity of freemen. Men who call for a bill of rights, have not recovered from the habits they acquired under the monarchical government of Great-Britain.
“I have the same opinion with the antifederalists of the danger of trusting arbitrary power to any single body of men; but no such power will be committed to our new rulers. Neither the house of representatives, the senate, or the president can perform a single legislative act by themselves. An hundred principles in man will lead them to watch, to check and to oppose each other, should an attempt be made by either of them upon the liberties of the people. If we may judge of their conduct, by what we have so often observed in all the state governments, the members of the federal legislature will much oftener injure their constituents by voting agreeably to their inclinations, than against them.
“But are we to consider men entrusted with power as the receptacles of all the depravity of human nature? By no means. The people do not part with their full proportions of it. Reason and revelation both deceive us, if they are all wise and virtuous. Is not history as full of the vices of the people, as it is of the crimes of the kings? what is the present moral character of the citizens of the United States? I need not discover it. It proves too plainly, that the people are as much disposed to vice as their rulers, and that nothing but a vigorous and efficient government can prevent their degenerating into savages, or devouring each other like beasts of prey.
“A simple democracy, has been very aptly compared by Mr. Ames of Massachusetts, to a volcano that contained within its bowels the fiery materials of its own destruction. A citizen of one of the Cantons of Switzerland in the year 1776, refused to drink in my presence “the commonwealth of America” as a toast, and gave as a reason for it, “that a simple democracy was the devil’s own government.”—The experience of the American states under the present confederation has in too many instances justified these two accounts of a simple popular government.
“It would have been a truth, if Mr. Locke had not said it, that where there is no law, there can be no liberty, and nothing deserves the name of law but that which is certain, and universal in its operation upon all the members of the community.
“To look up to a government that establishes justice, insures order, cherishes virtue, secures property, and protects from every species of violence, affords a pleasure, that can only be exceeded by looking up in all circumstances to an overuling providence.—Such a pleasure I hope is before us, and our posterity under the influence of the new government.
“The dimensions of the human mind, are apt to be regulated by the extent and objects of the government under which it is formed. Think then my friend, of the expansion and dignity the American mind will acquire, by having its powers transferred from the contracted objects of a state to the unbounded objects of a national government!—A citizen and a legislator of the free and UNITED STATES of America, will be one of the first characters in the world.
“I would not have you suppose, after what I have written, that I believe the new government to be without faults. I can see them, but not in any of the writings or speeches of any of the persons who are opposed to it. But who ever saw any thing perfect come from the hands of man? It realises notwithstanding in a great degree, every wish I ever entertained in every stage of the revolution for the happiness of my country, for you know that I have acquired no new opinions on principles upon the subject of republics, by the sorrowful events we have lately witnessed in America.—In the year 1776, I lost the confidence of the people of Pennsylvania, by openly exposing the dangers of a simple democracy, and declaring myself an advocate for a government composed of three legislative branches.
“Adieu—from dear sir, yours sincerely.”
As is true of the Founders, and Colonists, this letter is sage - even in its 'Trust' of government more than The People.
Remember the word "Democracy" is synonymous with Socialism which since January 20, 2009 adds the words atheist and human precept rules of behavior to "nothing deserves the name of law"
-- No Truth - No Trust - - therefore No Justice -- and licentiousness pervades all branches and administrative-police-state of Executive dictatorship --- just like abuses - among the lessons of the Declaration; noting that many of those abuses do not require the alteration of one word - in their exact tyranny, usurpation, and oppression -- long since resulting in despotism....and no longer sufferable either; for now babes-in-arms will be the recipients of despoiling and enslavement....
Having said this, were it not for Speaker Boehner and the minority of Republican Party minority -- refusing to bow to the great and sacred-vain-idol-god, Majority of arbitrary force and control; We the People would have already lost -- and may have given the per taxpaying citizen debt share $191,709 plus interest $8,148 on a Gross National Debt 60,873,739,000,000 + growing by millisecond. You need to visit .http://www.usdebtclock.org/index.html and as you do...
Remember We the People have completely opposed PPAA/H.Clinton's Universal Healthcare over the last 19 years; there is Not One Republican, House or Senate, Signature to Law on PPAA ; and 4 Justices of the Supreme Court eradicated PPAA, thus completing that the 'very reverent supplication to the great and sacred-vain-idol-god, Majority' literally forcing it down our - each-one-person's throat in the interest of despoil and enslave --- thus reflecting " ...Without them, a volume of rights would avail nothing, .... where there is no law, there can be no liberty, and nothing deserves the name of law but that which is certain, and universal in its operation upon all the members of the community. ..". There are no Three Sacred Documents -
Thursday, February 13, 2014
Representative Duncan Hunter’s TownHall Phone Call - email response 02/05/14
I participated in Representative Hunter's Town Hall Phone Call and in Senator Cruz's both regarding the heineous "PPAA" which is Repealed since it is Not Valid fact, truth in any part of its content especially "Affordable" for it alone,
Representative Hunter - Yes, there is a "reason" for that word in relation to Article IV:4 including protection from invasion which includes infringement of ALL Rights of Constitutional Person - "The individual component of the polity is the Person, which is defined as any being consisting of or having the essential cognitive attributes of a member of the species homo sapiens, including both the capacity to compete with others for the means to exercise the natural rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and the capacity to regulate its competitive actions to avoid depriving others of those rights and to sacrifice itself for the greater good of the polity as a whole or for their common posterity." There Are No Physical or Environmental Characteristics of Person; and Law is written to protect the inherent righteousness of men - The assumption of Trust in Truth - "Religion and Morality" person to himself, to those he knows, and to those he will never know, any location on God's Planet administrated by our King of Kings. Gender does not matter -- "Deeds" in all roles of life is what is judged; and not by personality of UDHR's Article 29 enforced by 30 or by the Executive Branch's administrative-police-state-martinet's minnie kingdom.
"The polity, or society, is created by the Social Contract, in which persons agree to join together for mutual benefit and defense, and to regulate their behavior to avoid forms of competition which are destructive of social coherence and effectiveness, such as violence, deception, or collusion, or to infringe on the rights of others." at http://www.constitution.org/consprin.htm
---Thank you so much for your Townhall Phone Call; and your opening statements of concern -- especially the reference to this "Person" in the White House who has completely repudiated his Personal integrity in Promise - Article II:1, Clause 8 Oath of Office: The Person occupying the People's House is more than simply a "liar" -- read both the Constitutional Principals carefully; for our Republic under God --- means ALL GOD'S LAWS, expressed in the "forbidden and denial of any form of law" in the Declaration of Independence -- so that before you have certain, unalienable natural rights, you, person, must have the entitlement of your unique Immortall-Soul as “separate and equal station, and the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God”, that is James Madison’s Essay “Property” at http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/ founders/documents/v1ch 16s23.html, in order to exercise your rights... and Oath of Office; like your Oath into the Service, my Nightingale Pledge, and a physician's Hippocratic Oath, each-one-Person with God as Witness, are the unique in the history of mankind, Republican Form of Representative Government.
It's Important, Rep. Hunter and completely ignored by to many Americans and the World’s - Obama Socialist Atheist Properties (WASP) -- because the "Constitution is "see law" and a dictated and decreed, isolated Document which has absolutely no connection to either the "Moral Government of God", or the Declaration's 1137 words of God's and Founders Lessons, Instructions, abuses, definitions and promises from that day to this; aka Patriarch Washington's "Of all dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports. ...and let it simply be asked...perhaps you know the rest of this succinct statement of our Archetypal government protecting One Person from the man sitting in the White House doing exactly what you described in your opening remarks. (Among machine-gun fire, this person, who is accountable to God, was called a liar at least three times)
That No Person of God and Nation First understands what the Colonists, Founders among them, absolutely understood without any doubt whatsoever in our Everlasting Father and His son our King of Kings, Counselor and Friend, Jesus --- The Three Sacred Documents.
I had to preamble this, for your remarks accurate as there were, though the US Debt clock at
http://www.usdebtclock.org/index.html requires updating and spend a few minutes in some simple percentage math... especially "business which has absolutely no relationship with government except taxes and licenses, (US called private enterprise; Socialist atheists “The Rich get richer and the poor get poorer - sorry, but that’s from the new Catholic Bishop who has never even experienced the greater risk/ and great rewards, SWOT of planning), in order to have the business be permitted privilege and immunity"; i.e the 16+Trillion on your right side! Then cross over to the left side's 6 largest budget items and note first, the only numbers spiraling downward is Defense; 5 of the top 6 - especially cursor over "income security"??? where in the constitution is that located???? -- alone -- draw approx. 15% of the 16 Trillion + in revenue; and don't forget the 1.07 Gross debt to GDP ratio --- to say nothing of the "Gross National Debt" $60.840+Trillion to the $16 +trillion revenue --- and a Federal Level of government who cannot comprehend or define the word "ceiling".
You see, at the now increase to $191,634 per taxpaying citizen - not adding the interest, -- every one taxpayer is now an "Indentured Servant of government". There's more here in these numbers -- you have to use logic or relate and connect;.. and your observational skills as a Marine.. check out number of Fed Employees and realize they pay their income taxes with taxpayer dollars, ie it is not money from the "businesses which are not attached to government”.....(you cannot call it 'private enterprise' for those words are also extinct in socialism)
Next visit http://www.gao.gov/browse/agency -- note the number of Article II - closed-shop-SEIUnion-dictatorship-administrative-state - lawmakers -- not regulation...Law, Rep. Hunter! Go here for "Administrative-state" info (2 Sites): http://imprimis.hillsdale.edu/file/archives/pdf/2013_10_Imprimis.pdf (BTW if you haven't subscribed, please do.. and think of your son with Dr. Arne :-) !) and http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Administrative+Agency, though Jim DeMint has a great article at Heritage and BTW -- look at the work it has done at http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2013/10/after-repeal-of-obamacare-moving-to-patient-centered-market-based-health-care. Heritage President Jim DeMint who has kept the work of the Republicans in the Senate.
Regarding 16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177 late 2d, Sec 256: at http://www.constitution.org/uslaw/16amjur2nd.htm -- Not only is there not One Republican Signature to PPAA from either House or Senate; but also 10 States of Socialist-Socialist (used to be DEM-DEM, but that party is extinct since they still support in law the Three Sacred Documents i.e Republic under God) Representatives --- every single Republican in those States had ZERO - consent of the governed, aka Voters, i.e the Blue States of "top two vote getters regardless of political party affiliation" as long as it is socialist; and except for One Person, from among We the People, who REFUSED TO PARTICIPATE in the vote Ya or Nay regarding PPAA, - Sen. Bunning of Kentucky - who does not know that "silence is agreement" ( it is in Ezekiel 33: 1-22 but really the whole chapter if you want to look at what God instructed Ezekiel directly), in refusing to vote, -- disowned-disenfranchised 50% of the State of Kentucky. Please realize that means the Declaration's consent of the governed to protect all rights not just "among these are..." -- see http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/v1ch16s23.html.,-- also declared and decreed non-existent-forbidden null and void.
Four Justices of the Supreme Court eradicated the Entire PPAA from law; which justice roberts (lower case is intentional as is his malice prepense) was required to stop; especially since he is the 'ravenous wolf of sheep's clothing' in which you cannot obtain grapes from thorns in Matt. 7:15-23 He refused: "The Court sustains this legislation by assuming two deviations from the facts of this particular case; first, it assumes a state of facts the record Does Not Support, and secondly, it Refuses to Consider facts which are Inescapable on the Record."--Justice Jackson 1947
There is more I could help you understand; but if you will spend about, well I'll leave that to you..;for the most important part of our Founders was their wisdom, knowledge, truth and Trust in I Timothy 1: 3-19... and Proverbs especially 8 "I have been here from the first, before...."; and Learning directly from them, for yourself, will increase you Joy in wisdom, knowledge and Truth in and of itself -- and the presence of our Lord all locations of our organizational chart, the Equilateral Triangle of Representative Government of, by, and for The People...
Always use "AMERICAN DICTIONARY of the English Language" for the meanings of words relating to The Three Sacred Documents. It is The original Text for our Archetypal Republican government of One person and all minorities protected; for unless God is Law, it is impossible, as witnessed in PPAA's majority absent reason-truth-knowledge-wisdom with "Malice Prepense" (which you will find in the word "murder" as in the 9th Commandment ..at http://1828.mshaffer.com/d/word/congress and look at #4 definition of our Article 4:4
Last, look up the word "precedent"(at http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/precedent,
noting One man equal to another man and remembering that Person of unique body and eternal soul - is Not the "Every Body" in the "Human Family" reporting to his "Community" from which, alone his free and full development of personality is possible" - Article 29.1 at http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/index.shtml#a29 --- and don't forget the importance of "climate change" at http://habitat.igc.org/agenda21/ where the NonGovernmental, Appointed, few men of Kyoto Protocol, UN/UNESCO have determined with our EPA - Interior have declared control in force of all life on God's Planet earth because of the "Threat" of too much C, but solely when attached to O2 --- only one of the tiniest elements among CON-H and Sun mandatory and inherent to all plant and animal life..”Climate Change”: Executive Order 13653 of November 1, 2013 PREPARING THE UNITED STATES FOR THE IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE connects to UN/UNESCO/WSIS/UDHR - Agenda 21 Global Warming and therfore to PPAA for both depend exclusively upon One Gas C...O2 :
There is a Cherry Tree and a Peach Tree for Socialist's, using Cloward-Piven at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloward%E2%80%93Piven_strategy because this is exactly what you are experiencing when you spoke of how you have learned to write a Bill --- You see with the Socialists you will never write a Bill correctly - for UDHR Article 19.
Precedent means: One judge or legislator or administrative-state-martinet will decree that Cherry from one to whatever inanimate, indifferent-object, number, from the whole cherry tree as mandatory to determine the 'settled, but not settled right"(Justice Brandis 1932) or "“— "The Court sustains this legislation by assuming two deviations from the facts of this particular case; first, it assumes a state of facts the record Does Not Support, and secondly, it Refuses to Consider facts which are Inescapable on the Record. ".Justice Jackson of 1946-47 Everson v. Board of Education of the Township of Ewing in New York, to”fix”-Kill, the Peach Tree.
Right means "2. In morals and religion, just; equitable; accordant to the standard of truth and justice or the will of God. That alone is right in the sight of God, which is consonant to his will or law; this being the only perfect standard of truth and justice. In social and political affairs, that is right which is consonant to the laws and customs of a country, provided these laws and customs are not repugnant to the laws of God. A man's intentions may be right, though his actions may be wrong in consequence of a defect in judgment.
5. True; not erroneous or wrong; according to fact. If there be no prospect beyond the grave, the inference is certainly right, "let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we die." 6. Correct; passing a true judgment; not mistaken or wrong. You are right, justice, and you weigh this well. adv. 2. According to the law or will of God, or to the standard of truth and justice; as, to judge right. noun. 1. Conformity to the will of God, or to his law, the perfect standard of truth and justice. In the literal sense, right is a straight line of conduct, and wrong a crooked one. Right therefore is rectitude or straightness, and perfect rectitude is found only in an infinite Being and his will.
2. Conformity to human laws, or to other human standard of truth, propriety or justice. When laws are definite, right and wrong are easily ascertained and understood. In arts, there are some principles and rules which determine what is right. In many things indifferent, or left without positive law, we are to judge what is right by fitness or propriety, by custom, civility or other circumstances. 3. Justice; that which is due or proper; as, to do right to every man. Long love to her has borne the faithful knight, and well deserv'd had fortune done him right. 4. Freedom from error; conformity with truth or fact. Seldom your opinions err, your eyes are always in the right.".
Yes, socialist-atheists-"no fixed truth" (at http://www.crossroad.to/Quotes/communism/alinsky.htm) are creating, and establishing a new case or bill called ‘cherry-peach tree’; both of which have a stone.
Precedent’s fruit- Stone's other name is Man in the Cherry Tree is equal to Man in the Peach Tree; and Nature's Law, to say nothing about fruit tree’s nature, "Things equal to the same thing are equal to each other"; or a Cherry Tree equals a Peach Tree.
Now that's a fairly clear absurdity; but Cloward-Piven-Obama-H. Clinton Lucifer Alinsky -- absent a fixed Truth and with the aid of "The moral rightness of any action is determined by its consequences; lie and steal (steal is more than object see www.1828.mshaffer,com) are justified if the benefits outweigh the harm" stated in UDHR as "Article !9: Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers" [boundaries, jurisprudence]; and you may need to look up "Truth" in the 1828 because of the extensive and unique definition you will find there; -- and check-out "Person" and "Soul" also, for you will never find another AMERICAN DICTIONARY which utilizes Scripture as Testimony and attestation to Truth of words for communication and language as succinctly stated as in Dr. Webster's 25 years of work for our archetypal republican form of government...
Mr. Justice Jackson’s “Dissent” has become the single most reliable statement of predicable outcome of the Supreme Court; and is the watchword of prophecy in violation of Truth and more important, sometimes, Trust in the assumption that Person is honest and righteous - innocent with the responsibility for guilt on the accuser because of the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God within The Three Sacred Documents. Everson is the never to be argued in any court again, "great and impenetrable wall between church and state, where church is synonymous with "Religion and Morality" of an Individual person, i.e that is not the definition of church; and therefore, a horrendous error of human precept rules of behavior, which is now demonstrable as repudiation of The Creator of the universe as just another religion; and never “Religion itself” especially applied to the stone in cherry and peach tree..
But let us not lose track of our cherry and peach tree analogy, for it is essential to understanding the great and sacred-vain-idol-god, Majority "..interest in every community to despoil and enslave the minority of individuals; and in a federal community to make a similar sacrifice of the minority of the component States..."--James Madison. See ---Section 6201 of PPAA “Direct Patient Access Employees of Long-term Care Facilities and Providers.” in which more than 17,500,000 (2009 figures of health professionals primarily RN’s) Constitutional-Persons, within the 50 States, including those States which do not collect fingerprints from honest people, shall not continue work, nor providers, within the entire world of persons who produce an distribute all medical, diagnostic, care and treatment supplies in the USA, unless each-one-person at his own expense, declares his innocence of criminality through his living, indifferent-object fingers. "Only individual persons or corporate "persons" which are composed of individual persons may be the subject of legal process. Inanimate objects and living objects not capable of conducting their own defense in a court of law may not be parties to an action at law." at http://www.constitution.org/consprin.htm , again except the 2009Obama Atheist Socialist Anti-law, Human Precept Regime - government-over-man in The Federalist Papers.
That the DOJ won’t release, because of the 5th Amendment and privacy, any criminal record history unless Both the Name of the incarcerated and the Criminal Code are clearly stated on the request form, represents the mandatory freeze of any form to “seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media to obliterate any semblance of interference in frontier”, boundary, or jurisdiction of the dictates and decrees among the appointed and the Obama Socialist Atheist Regime;
If force and control of government want a useless data base of the privacy of honest Americans...then the police-administrative -state shall have such a record...and do go there...It Does Not prevent In any way, shape or form -- criminal activity; and because it is Marxism -- that isn't the point of the law against honest people see crossroads/Alinsky about the lower third of the page where you dress stuff in moral garments like the lamb, but the Hobbit Dragon is right underneath, like a trap-door spider - size not being necessarily relative to the analogy
From Thomas Jefferson "“It is of great importance to set a resolution, not to be shaken, never to tell an untruth. There is no vice so mean, so pitiful, so contemptible; and he who permits himself to tell a lie once, finds it much easier to do it a second and a third time, till at length it becomes habitual; he tells lies without attending to it, and truths without the world’s believing him. This falsehood of the tongue leads to that of the heart, and in time depraves all its good disposition.”–Thomas Jefferson letter to Peter Carr, August 19, 1785 [ ]
Rep. Hunter this is exactly what has happened to our Republic under God -- Lie is so permeated and diffuse, every person is blind following blind and dear following deaf --- Patriarch Washington said it this way "It is amazing how people cannot see The Light shining in their eye." -- The Way, The Light of Truth, and The Life;...and it is mixed with denying this definition of Politics "The science of government; that part of ethics which consists in the regulation and government of a nation or state, for the preservation of its safety, peace and prosperity; comprehending the defense of its existence and rights against foreign control or conquest, the augmentation of its strength and resources, and the protection of its citizens in their rights, with the preservation and improvement of their morals. Politics, as a science or an art, is a subject of vast extent and importance.".
Bottom Line: PPAA IS REPEALED because "“The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be In agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail. "
...except in the 2009Obama Atheist, Socialist, Anti-law, Human precept rules of behavior –“ lie and steal are justified if the benefits outweigh the harm”: and opinion, probability of Truth is a right of government... and ignorance and want -- the greatest tools of John 8's father evil-father lie. Our Republican Party of Principle is silent. Is practicing the Sentinel refusing to warn of God's swift sword... and thereby allowing The Three Sacred Documents to be thoroughly destroyed and overthrown... and yes it is tyranny, usurpation, and despotism...and the 'administrative-police-state is genuine and real....just look at how little of all the work you, Rep. Issa and all Republicans (except perhaps the Progressives who think that there is no loss of the constitution or anyone's rights - especially Amendment IX....) which IS FORBIDDEN COMMUNICATION TO ALL AMERICANS, not just constituents.
This is one of the most insulting things all House Members do, besides hiding their party affiliation of Bills; You sit on Committees affecting the 50 States and Territories and act, as if you only want to hear from those in your District!!!!!? That's your own, little Cherry Tree, isn't it! I'm addressing this not just to you, Rep. Hunter --- Obama is One Person, You are One person -- exactly as I am One Person-- no difference in Soul/ heart/mind /conscience/ truth or any of the range of New Testament Christ Teachings of Person of Eternal Soul and location when accountability occurs after death of body. Also, multiple-choice issues all Representatives, are absent The Declaration and Constitution, no Common Core Curriculum, No GW, Restrictions on our Nation's assets both Person and petroleum, outer space, though you mentioned manufacturing and you are correct, but with unions as dictators - business was forced to leave; and agi..we can't compete with mexico because of EPA, water, agi regs,, and on and on law-not regulation; punitive not supportive; and always distrust and not truth; and No Health care either... and other is forbidden cause your are suppose to choose only from the allowed stuff. Please open-up the multiple choice and remember We the People are of God and Nation First
So as it stands..here is what needs to start the destruction of father evil-father lie in John 8 -- you don't have to believe, simple logic is adequate and you did state the proofs in every word of your opening remarks, Rep. Hunter.
Please -- join Republicans together, and all stand on the floor of the House - as One in the Whole of our Republic - and say P.L 111-148 is REPEALED using Section 265 of 2nd ed. American Jurisprudence; enforce The Three Sacred Documents; and do not continue to deny God, Christ, and spit on our Flag, Puritans, Colonists, and Founders.
That is all you have to say -- and the Republican Minority in the Senate - as closed to exactly the same hour in the same day as humanly possible - or even better, visit each other in each other's House, together, and LOOK those Socialists in the Eye as you slowly, clearly state those words One....At.....A.......Time!!! "Man, once surrendering his reason, has no remaining guard against absurdities the most monstrous, and like a ship without rudder, is the spot of every wind. With such persons, gullibility, which they call faith, takes the helm from the hand of reason and the mind becomes a wreck.". --Thomas Jefferson The Truth stands on its own..and must be allowed...right?!
Please bear in mind, that in our seceded from the Union, without possibility of assistance in Article IV:4's Guarantee of our Republican form of government;...socialist region once known as California, there are, among the more than 500 anti-law Bills by the Socialist-tyranny of the majority absent knowledge, wisdom, truth, in which there is Not One Republican, Assembly or Senate Signature...such is the perfidy of the great and sacred-vain-idol-god, majority: I have asked Assemblyman Marie Waldron and not directly also, asked her to coordinate with Assemblyman Jones; haven't spoken to Sen. Wyland yet; to do exactly what I am asking you and all Republicans to do...You cannot serve both God and Mammon; and to think you can compromise -- well how would you like to play poker with father evil-father lie? How much do you think you will win? At the same time, Christ's 5W's and H written in The Three Sacred Documents are truly the only way.... and there is no human precept that can be supreme to the word of God..is there...
PPAA would not have, and did not come to consideration at any time before spring 2009. It exists exclusively because of tyranny of majority - European King/Emperor-ship of force and control:
"Under this philosophy, rule by majority vote is always subject to the "sacred principle" defined in President Jefferson's First Inaugural Address, quoted below.
"All, too, will bear in mind this sacred principle, that though the will of the majority is in all cases to prevail, that will to be rightful must be reasonable; that the minority possess their equal rights, which equal law must protect, and to violate would be oppression."
A Minority of One Protected: The protection provided by this principle applies fundamentally, of course, in favor of a minority of one: The Individual. No majority, however great even all of the people but one Individual--may properly infringe, or possess the power to infringe, the rights of any minority, however small--even a minority of a lone Individual." at http://www.lexrex.com/jml/index.php/the-american-ideal/8-american-ideal-part1/17-the-majority-limited-for-liberty
Some of what is written, and what I heard you say in our Townhall is among the words of truth I speak in the name of our Colonists, Founders, and Americans of everyday life from that time to this on FB, and in my blogs. I will be and have been writing a more extensive, in supporting proofs, the intrinsic, interwoven Three Sacred Documents; and more on Judicial especially its complete disrespect of person - and absence of Truth required for justice...human precept analogy of 'precedent'
There is nothing written herein that is absent proof..and you know that truth.
It is important not to spend time in the cherry tree. It is discouraging and impossible for evil is as diffuse in life; as Christ is in His and our Eternal Father in their magnificence; so spend your time in the Three Sacred Documents - Use Joseph Andrews Manuel at www.TeachConstitution.org He writes with the connections/ relate of the three documents...as do I. Be aware, there are many 'constitutionalists' who have been taught secular human precepts. Law is The Declaration and Constitution with your innate 'common sense'. Both are written of, by, and for The Whole of the Polity. If you read The Bible, you can understand and use Law.... Trust and continue faith in yourself and in the Truth..using the work of the Founders. I can and would like to help. For example, your Bill Summary has the "Constitutional Authority" completely absent The Constitutional Authority" -- I Timothy's Empty Argument of they have no idea either of the meaning of the words they use or of the themes upon which they harp". I can help with that and have..Cathy
PS I had to leave to pick a friend up in urgent care; but really enjoyed and listened to all you said Rep. Hunter; and I very much appreciated being involved. Thank you. I have personal experience in understanding Gospel, March 12, 1770 "Journal"; The Founder's and what they have taught me...11CV 1760 MMA POR - I wrote it and presented it to US District Court. Among my 26 pieces of evidence was PPAA's Section 6201 -- before anyone knew of the Section's extreme police-state- fingers supreme to person's heart/ mind/ soul/ conscience in honor and integrity. The 4 Attorney Generals and their staffs saw this piece of evidence...among other proofs of the issue of fingerprints and revoked grandfather clauses.
I have lived the abuses, including just last week in CA superior court in which my "forgiven DMV smog violation" was not forgiven by the judge in the court, because I didn't appear on the proper date of hearing. I didn't appear because there was no "reason" to appear. I had completely complied with what DMV required of me. But because my body did not enter the door of the courtroom, there was a $50.00 courtroom use fee; a $15.00 "processing fee for the clerk" and $150.00 for the judge who decided I was guilty of not presenting my body to his courtroom on the date required -- violation cannot be forgiven until body enters court -- there is no such idea as a "forgiven violation" the superior court of CA forbids such a concept..... I'm on SS; and there is another story about an ill Dutchman who was told one thing and forbidden that thing..in the same courtroom. No person in that room, except the judge himself, agreed with the complete rudeness and disrespect of that judge...and I don't care what his name is...It isn't his personality. It is his honor, duty and service in Truth he has completely failed. I think I can report it to the FBI - something about they investigate violations of the supreme Law of the Land; though isn't that what in silence, we are repudiating its existence and allowing few men to dictate that there is no God and No natural rights or any rights for that matter.....?
Representative Hunter - Yes, there is a "reason" for that word in relation to Article IV:4 including protection from invasion which includes infringement of ALL Rights of Constitutional Person - "The individual component of the polity is the Person, which is defined as any being consisting of or having the essential cognitive attributes of a member of the species homo sapiens, including both the capacity to compete with others for the means to exercise the natural rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and the capacity to regulate its competitive actions to avoid depriving others of those rights and to sacrifice itself for the greater good of the polity as a whole or for their common posterity." There Are No Physical or Environmental Characteristics of Person; and Law is written to protect the inherent righteousness of men - The assumption of Trust in Truth - "Religion and Morality" person to himself, to those he knows, and to those he will never know, any location on God's Planet administrated by our King of Kings. Gender does not matter -- "Deeds" in all roles of life is what is judged; and not by personality of UDHR's Article 29 enforced by 30 or by the Executive Branch's administrative-police-state-martinet's minnie kingdom.
"The polity, or society, is created by the Social Contract, in which persons agree to join together for mutual benefit and defense, and to regulate their behavior to avoid forms of competition which are destructive of social coherence and effectiveness, such as violence, deception, or collusion, or to infringe on the rights of others." at http://www.constitution.org/consprin.htm
---Thank you so much for your Townhall Phone Call; and your opening statements of concern -- especially the reference to this "Person" in the White House who has completely repudiated his Personal integrity in Promise - Article II:1, Clause 8 Oath of Office: The Person occupying the People's House is more than simply a "liar" -- read both the Constitutional Principals carefully; for our Republic under God --- means ALL GOD'S LAWS, expressed in the "forbidden and denial of any form of law" in the Declaration of Independence -- so that before you have certain, unalienable natural rights, you, person, must have the entitlement of your unique Immortall-Soul as “separate and equal station, and the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God”, that is James Madison’s Essay “Property” at http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/ founders/documents/v1ch 16s23.html, in order to exercise your rights... and Oath of Office; like your Oath into the Service, my Nightingale Pledge, and a physician's Hippocratic Oath, each-one-Person with God as Witness, are the unique in the history of mankind, Republican Form of Representative Government.
It's Important, Rep. Hunter and completely ignored by to many Americans and the World’s - Obama Socialist Atheist Properties (WASP) -- because the "Constitution is "see law" and a dictated and decreed, isolated Document which has absolutely no connection to either the "Moral Government of God", or the Declaration's 1137 words of God's and Founders Lessons, Instructions, abuses, definitions and promises from that day to this; aka Patriarch Washington's "Of all dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports. ...and let it simply be asked...perhaps you know the rest of this succinct statement of our Archetypal government protecting One Person from the man sitting in the White House doing exactly what you described in your opening remarks. (Among machine-gun fire, this person, who is accountable to God, was called a liar at least three times)
That No Person of God and Nation First understands what the Colonists, Founders among them, absolutely understood without any doubt whatsoever in our Everlasting Father and His son our King of Kings, Counselor and Friend, Jesus --- The Three Sacred Documents.
I had to preamble this, for your remarks accurate as there were, though the US Debt clock at
http://www.usdebtclock.org/index.html requires updating and spend a few minutes in some simple percentage math... especially "business which has absolutely no relationship with government except taxes and licenses, (US called private enterprise; Socialist atheists “The Rich get richer and the poor get poorer - sorry, but that’s from the new Catholic Bishop who has never even experienced the greater risk/ and great rewards, SWOT of planning), in order to have the business be permitted privilege and immunity"; i.e the 16+Trillion on your right side! Then cross over to the left side's 6 largest budget items and note first, the only numbers spiraling downward is Defense; 5 of the top 6 - especially cursor over "income security"??? where in the constitution is that located???? -- alone -- draw approx. 15% of the 16 Trillion + in revenue; and don't forget the 1.07 Gross debt to GDP ratio --- to say nothing of the "Gross National Debt" $60.840+Trillion to the $16 +trillion revenue --- and a Federal Level of government who cannot comprehend or define the word "ceiling".
You see, at the now increase to $191,634 per taxpaying citizen - not adding the interest, -- every one taxpayer is now an "Indentured Servant of government". There's more here in these numbers -- you have to use logic or relate and connect;.. and your observational skills as a Marine.. check out number of Fed Employees and realize they pay their income taxes with taxpayer dollars, ie it is not money from the "businesses which are not attached to government”.....(you cannot call it 'private enterprise' for those words are also extinct in socialism)
Next visit http://www.gao.gov/browse/agency -- note the number of Article II - closed-shop-SEIUnion-dictatorship-administrative-state - lawmakers -- not regulation...Law, Rep. Hunter! Go here for "Administrative-state" info (2 Sites): http://imprimis.hillsdale.edu/file/archives/pdf/2013_10_Imprimis.pdf (BTW if you haven't subscribed, please do.. and think of your son with Dr. Arne :-) !) and http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Administrative+Agency, though Jim DeMint has a great article at Heritage and BTW -- look at the work it has done at http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2013/10/after-repeal-of-obamacare-moving-to-patient-centered-market-based-health-care. Heritage President Jim DeMint who has kept the work of the Republicans in the Senate.
Regarding 16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177 late 2d, Sec 256: at http://www.constitution.org/uslaw/16amjur2nd.htm -- Not only is there not One Republican Signature to PPAA from either House or Senate; but also 10 States of Socialist-Socialist (used to be DEM-DEM, but that party is extinct since they still support in law the Three Sacred Documents i.e Republic under God) Representatives --- every single Republican in those States had ZERO - consent of the governed, aka Voters, i.e the Blue States of "top two vote getters regardless of political party affiliation" as long as it is socialist; and except for One Person, from among We the People, who REFUSED TO PARTICIPATE in the vote Ya or Nay regarding PPAA, - Sen. Bunning of Kentucky - who does not know that "silence is agreement" ( it is in Ezekiel 33: 1-22 but really the whole chapter if you want to look at what God instructed Ezekiel directly), in refusing to vote, -- disowned-disenfranchised 50% of the State of Kentucky. Please realize that means the Declaration's consent of the governed to protect all rights not just "among these are..." -- see http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/v1ch16s23.html.,-- also declared and decreed non-existent-forbidden null and void.
Four Justices of the Supreme Court eradicated the Entire PPAA from law; which justice roberts (lower case is intentional as is his malice prepense) was required to stop; especially since he is the 'ravenous wolf of sheep's clothing' in which you cannot obtain grapes from thorns in Matt. 7:15-23 He refused: "The Court sustains this legislation by assuming two deviations from the facts of this particular case; first, it assumes a state of facts the record Does Not Support, and secondly, it Refuses to Consider facts which are Inescapable on the Record."--Justice Jackson 1947
There is more I could help you understand; but if you will spend about, well I'll leave that to you..;for the most important part of our Founders was their wisdom, knowledge, truth and Trust in I Timothy 1: 3-19... and Proverbs especially 8 "I have been here from the first, before...."; and Learning directly from them, for yourself, will increase you Joy in wisdom, knowledge and Truth in and of itself -- and the presence of our Lord all locations of our organizational chart, the Equilateral Triangle of Representative Government of, by, and for The People...
Always use "AMERICAN DICTIONARY of the English Language" for the meanings of words relating to The Three Sacred Documents. It is The original Text for our Archetypal Republican government of One person and all minorities protected; for unless God is Law, it is impossible, as witnessed in PPAA's majority absent reason-truth-knowledge-wisdom with "Malice Prepense" (which you will find in the word "murder" as in the 9th Commandment ..at http://1828.mshaffer.com/d/word/congress and look at #4 definition of our Article 4:4
Last, look up the word "precedent"(at http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/precedent,
noting One man equal to another man and remembering that Person of unique body and eternal soul - is Not the "Every Body" in the "Human Family" reporting to his "Community" from which, alone his free and full development of personality is possible" - Article 29.1 at http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/index.shtml#a29 --- and don't forget the importance of "climate change" at http://habitat.igc.org/agenda21/ where the NonGovernmental, Appointed, few men of Kyoto Protocol, UN/UNESCO have determined with our EPA - Interior have declared control in force of all life on God's Planet earth because of the "Threat" of too much C, but solely when attached to O2 --- only one of the tiniest elements among CON-H and Sun mandatory and inherent to all plant and animal life..”Climate Change”: Executive Order 13653 of November 1, 2013 PREPARING THE UNITED STATES FOR THE IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE connects to UN/UNESCO/WSIS/UDHR - Agenda 21 Global Warming and therfore to PPAA for both depend exclusively upon One Gas C...O2 :
There is a Cherry Tree and a Peach Tree for Socialist's, using Cloward-Piven at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloward%E2%80%93Piven_strategy because this is exactly what you are experiencing when you spoke of how you have learned to write a Bill --- You see with the Socialists you will never write a Bill correctly - for UDHR Article 19.
Precedent means: One judge or legislator or administrative-state-martinet will decree that Cherry from one to whatever inanimate, indifferent-object, number, from the whole cherry tree as mandatory to determine the 'settled, but not settled right"(Justice Brandis 1932) or "“— "The Court sustains this legislation by assuming two deviations from the facts of this particular case; first, it assumes a state of facts the record Does Not Support, and secondly, it Refuses to Consider facts which are Inescapable on the Record. ".Justice Jackson of 1946-47 Everson v. Board of Education of the Township of Ewing in New York, to”fix”-Kill, the Peach Tree.
Right means "2. In morals and religion, just; equitable; accordant to the standard of truth and justice or the will of God. That alone is right in the sight of God, which is consonant to his will or law; this being the only perfect standard of truth and justice. In social and political affairs, that is right which is consonant to the laws and customs of a country, provided these laws and customs are not repugnant to the laws of God. A man's intentions may be right, though his actions may be wrong in consequence of a defect in judgment.
5. True; not erroneous or wrong; according to fact. If there be no prospect beyond the grave, the inference is certainly right, "let us eat and drink, for tomorrow we die." 6. Correct; passing a true judgment; not mistaken or wrong. You are right, justice, and you weigh this well. adv. 2. According to the law or will of God, or to the standard of truth and justice; as, to judge right. noun. 1. Conformity to the will of God, or to his law, the perfect standard of truth and justice. In the literal sense, right is a straight line of conduct, and wrong a crooked one. Right therefore is rectitude or straightness, and perfect rectitude is found only in an infinite Being and his will.
2. Conformity to human laws, or to other human standard of truth, propriety or justice. When laws are definite, right and wrong are easily ascertained and understood. In arts, there are some principles and rules which determine what is right. In many things indifferent, or left without positive law, we are to judge what is right by fitness or propriety, by custom, civility or other circumstances. 3. Justice; that which is due or proper; as, to do right to every man. Long love to her has borne the faithful knight, and well deserv'd had fortune done him right. 4. Freedom from error; conformity with truth or fact. Seldom your opinions err, your eyes are always in the right.".
Yes, socialist-atheists-"no fixed truth" (at http://www.crossroad.to/Quotes/communism/alinsky.htm) are creating, and establishing a new case or bill called ‘cherry-peach tree’; both of which have a stone.
Precedent’s fruit- Stone's other name is Man in the Cherry Tree is equal to Man in the Peach Tree; and Nature's Law, to say nothing about fruit tree’s nature, "Things equal to the same thing are equal to each other"; or a Cherry Tree equals a Peach Tree.
Now that's a fairly clear absurdity; but Cloward-Piven-Obama-H. Clinton Lucifer Alinsky -- absent a fixed Truth and with the aid of "The moral rightness of any action is determined by its consequences; lie and steal (steal is more than object see www.1828.mshaffer,com) are justified if the benefits outweigh the harm" stated in UDHR as "Article !9: Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers" [boundaries, jurisprudence]; and you may need to look up "Truth" in the 1828 because of the extensive and unique definition you will find there; -- and check-out "Person" and "Soul" also, for you will never find another AMERICAN DICTIONARY which utilizes Scripture as Testimony and attestation to Truth of words for communication and language as succinctly stated as in Dr. Webster's 25 years of work for our archetypal republican form of government...
Mr. Justice Jackson’s “Dissent” has become the single most reliable statement of predicable outcome of the Supreme Court; and is the watchword of prophecy in violation of Truth and more important, sometimes, Trust in the assumption that Person is honest and righteous - innocent with the responsibility for guilt on the accuser because of the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God within The Three Sacred Documents. Everson is the never to be argued in any court again, "great and impenetrable wall between church and state, where church is synonymous with "Religion and Morality" of an Individual person, i.e that is not the definition of church; and therefore, a horrendous error of human precept rules of behavior, which is now demonstrable as repudiation of The Creator of the universe as just another religion; and never “Religion itself” especially applied to the stone in cherry and peach tree..
But let us not lose track of our cherry and peach tree analogy, for it is essential to understanding the great and sacred-vain-idol-god, Majority "..interest in every community to despoil and enslave the minority of individuals; and in a federal community to make a similar sacrifice of the minority of the component States..."--James Madison. See ---Section 6201 of PPAA “Direct Patient Access Employees of Long-term Care Facilities and Providers.” in which more than 17,500,000 (2009 figures of health professionals primarily RN’s) Constitutional-Persons, within the 50 States, including those States which do not collect fingerprints from honest people, shall not continue work, nor providers, within the entire world of persons who produce an distribute all medical, diagnostic, care and treatment supplies in the USA, unless each-one-person at his own expense, declares his innocence of criminality through his living, indifferent-object fingers. "Only individual persons or corporate "persons" which are composed of individual persons may be the subject of legal process. Inanimate objects and living objects not capable of conducting their own defense in a court of law may not be parties to an action at law." at http://www.constitution.org/consprin.htm , again except the 2009Obama Atheist Socialist Anti-law, Human Precept Regime - government-over-man in The Federalist Papers.
That the DOJ won’t release, because of the 5th Amendment and privacy, any criminal record history unless Both the Name of the incarcerated and the Criminal Code are clearly stated on the request form, represents the mandatory freeze of any form to “seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media to obliterate any semblance of interference in frontier”, boundary, or jurisdiction of the dictates and decrees among the appointed and the Obama Socialist Atheist Regime;
If force and control of government want a useless data base of the privacy of honest Americans...then the police-administrative -state shall have such a record...and do go there...It Does Not prevent In any way, shape or form -- criminal activity; and because it is Marxism -- that isn't the point of the law against honest people see crossroads/Alinsky about the lower third of the page where you dress stuff in moral garments like the lamb, but the Hobbit Dragon is right underneath, like a trap-door spider - size not being necessarily relative to the analogy
From Thomas Jefferson "“It is of great importance to set a resolution, not to be shaken, never to tell an untruth. There is no vice so mean, so pitiful, so contemptible; and he who permits himself to tell a lie once, finds it much easier to do it a second and a third time, till at length it becomes habitual; he tells lies without attending to it, and truths without the world’s believing him. This falsehood of the tongue leads to that of the heart, and in time depraves all its good disposition.”–Thomas Jefferson letter to Peter Carr, August 19, 1785 [ ]
Rep. Hunter this is exactly what has happened to our Republic under God -- Lie is so permeated and diffuse, every person is blind following blind and dear following deaf --- Patriarch Washington said it this way "It is amazing how people cannot see The Light shining in their eye." -- The Way, The Light of Truth, and The Life;...and it is mixed with denying this definition of Politics "The science of government; that part of ethics which consists in the regulation and government of a nation or state, for the preservation of its safety, peace and prosperity; comprehending the defense of its existence and rights against foreign control or conquest, the augmentation of its strength and resources, and the protection of its citizens in their rights, with the preservation and improvement of their morals. Politics, as a science or an art, is a subject of vast extent and importance.".
Bottom Line: PPAA IS REPEALED because "“The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be In agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail. "
...except in the 2009Obama Atheist, Socialist, Anti-law, Human precept rules of behavior –“ lie and steal are justified if the benefits outweigh the harm”: and opinion, probability of Truth is a right of government... and ignorance and want -- the greatest tools of John 8's father evil-father lie. Our Republican Party of Principle is silent. Is practicing the Sentinel refusing to warn of God's swift sword... and thereby allowing The Three Sacred Documents to be thoroughly destroyed and overthrown... and yes it is tyranny, usurpation, and despotism...and the 'administrative-police-state is genuine and real....just look at how little of all the work you, Rep. Issa and all Republicans (except perhaps the Progressives who think that there is no loss of the constitution or anyone's rights - especially Amendment IX....) which IS FORBIDDEN COMMUNICATION TO ALL AMERICANS, not just constituents.
This is one of the most insulting things all House Members do, besides hiding their party affiliation of Bills; You sit on Committees affecting the 50 States and Territories and act, as if you only want to hear from those in your District!!!!!? That's your own, little Cherry Tree, isn't it! I'm addressing this not just to you, Rep. Hunter --- Obama is One Person, You are One person -- exactly as I am One Person-- no difference in Soul/ heart/mind /conscience/ truth or any of the range of New Testament Christ Teachings of Person of Eternal Soul and location when accountability occurs after death of body. Also, multiple-choice issues all Representatives, are absent The Declaration and Constitution, no Common Core Curriculum, No GW, Restrictions on our Nation's assets both Person and petroleum, outer space, though you mentioned manufacturing and you are correct, but with unions as dictators - business was forced to leave; and agi..we can't compete with mexico because of EPA, water, agi regs,, and on and on law-not regulation; punitive not supportive; and always distrust and not truth; and No Health care either... and other is forbidden cause your are suppose to choose only from the allowed stuff. Please open-up the multiple choice and remember We the People are of God and Nation First
So as it stands..here is what needs to start the destruction of father evil-father lie in John 8 -- you don't have to believe, simple logic is adequate and you did state the proofs in every word of your opening remarks, Rep. Hunter.
Please -- join Republicans together, and all stand on the floor of the House - as One in the Whole of our Republic - and say P.L 111-148 is REPEALED using Section 265 of 2nd ed. American Jurisprudence; enforce The Three Sacred Documents; and do not continue to deny God, Christ, and spit on our Flag, Puritans, Colonists, and Founders.
That is all you have to say -- and the Republican Minority in the Senate - as closed to exactly the same hour in the same day as humanly possible - or even better, visit each other in each other's House, together, and LOOK those Socialists in the Eye as you slowly, clearly state those words One....At.....A.......Time!!! "Man, once surrendering his reason, has no remaining guard against absurdities the most monstrous, and like a ship without rudder, is the spot of every wind. With such persons, gullibility, which they call faith, takes the helm from the hand of reason and the mind becomes a wreck.". --Thomas Jefferson The Truth stands on its own..and must be allowed...right?!
Please bear in mind, that in our seceded from the Union, without possibility of assistance in Article IV:4's Guarantee of our Republican form of government;...socialist region once known as California, there are, among the more than 500 anti-law Bills by the Socialist-tyranny of the majority absent knowledge, wisdom, truth, in which there is Not One Republican, Assembly or Senate Signature...such is the perfidy of the great and sacred-vain-idol-god, majority: I have asked Assemblyman Marie Waldron and not directly also, asked her to coordinate with Assemblyman Jones; haven't spoken to Sen. Wyland yet; to do exactly what I am asking you and all Republicans to do...You cannot serve both God and Mammon; and to think you can compromise -- well how would you like to play poker with father evil-father lie? How much do you think you will win? At the same time, Christ's 5W's and H written in The Three Sacred Documents are truly the only way.... and there is no human precept that can be supreme to the word of God..is there...
PPAA would not have, and did not come to consideration at any time before spring 2009. It exists exclusively because of tyranny of majority - European King/Emperor-ship of force and control:
"Under this philosophy, rule by majority vote is always subject to the "sacred principle" defined in President Jefferson's First Inaugural Address, quoted below.
"All, too, will bear in mind this sacred principle, that though the will of the majority is in all cases to prevail, that will to be rightful must be reasonable; that the minority possess their equal rights, which equal law must protect, and to violate would be oppression."
A Minority of One Protected: The protection provided by this principle applies fundamentally, of course, in favor of a minority of one: The Individual. No majority, however great even all of the people but one Individual--may properly infringe, or possess the power to infringe, the rights of any minority, however small--even a minority of a lone Individual." at http://www.lexrex.com/jml/index.php/the-american-ideal/8-american-ideal-part1/17-the-majority-limited-for-liberty
Some of what is written, and what I heard you say in our Townhall is among the words of truth I speak in the name of our Colonists, Founders, and Americans of everyday life from that time to this on FB, and in my blogs. I will be and have been writing a more extensive, in supporting proofs, the intrinsic, interwoven Three Sacred Documents; and more on Judicial especially its complete disrespect of person - and absence of Truth required for justice...human precept analogy of 'precedent'
There is nothing written herein that is absent proof..and you know that truth.
It is important not to spend time in the cherry tree. It is discouraging and impossible for evil is as diffuse in life; as Christ is in His and our Eternal Father in their magnificence; so spend your time in the Three Sacred Documents - Use Joseph Andrews Manuel at www.TeachConstitution.org He writes with the connections/ relate of the three documents...as do I. Be aware, there are many 'constitutionalists' who have been taught secular human precepts. Law is The Declaration and Constitution with your innate 'common sense'. Both are written of, by, and for The Whole of the Polity. If you read The Bible, you can understand and use Law.... Trust and continue faith in yourself and in the Truth..using the work of the Founders. I can and would like to help. For example, your Bill Summary has the "Constitutional Authority" completely absent The Constitutional Authority" -- I Timothy's Empty Argument of they have no idea either of the meaning of the words they use or of the themes upon which they harp". I can help with that and have..Cathy
PS I had to leave to pick a friend up in urgent care; but really enjoyed and listened to all you said Rep. Hunter; and I very much appreciated being involved. Thank you. I have personal experience in understanding Gospel, March 12, 1770 "Journal"; The Founder's and what they have taught me...11CV 1760 MMA POR - I wrote it and presented it to US District Court. Among my 26 pieces of evidence was PPAA's Section 6201 -- before anyone knew of the Section's extreme police-state- fingers supreme to person's heart/ mind/ soul/ conscience in honor and integrity. The 4 Attorney Generals and their staffs saw this piece of evidence...among other proofs of the issue of fingerprints and revoked grandfather clauses.
I have lived the abuses, including just last week in CA superior court in which my "forgiven DMV smog violation" was not forgiven by the judge in the court, because I didn't appear on the proper date of hearing. I didn't appear because there was no "reason" to appear. I had completely complied with what DMV required of me. But because my body did not enter the door of the courtroom, there was a $50.00 courtroom use fee; a $15.00 "processing fee for the clerk" and $150.00 for the judge who decided I was guilty of not presenting my body to his courtroom on the date required -- violation cannot be forgiven until body enters court -- there is no such idea as a "forgiven violation" the superior court of CA forbids such a concept..... I'm on SS; and there is another story about an ill Dutchman who was told one thing and forbidden that thing..in the same courtroom. No person in that room, except the judge himself, agreed with the complete rudeness and disrespect of that judge...and I don't care what his name is...It isn't his personality. It is his honor, duty and service in Truth he has completely failed. I think I can report it to the FBI - something about they investigate violations of the supreme Law of the Land; though isn't that what in silence, we are repudiating its existence and allowing few men to dictate that there is no God and No natural rights or any rights for that matter.....?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)