Sunday, September 9, 2012
California is a written-off Democratic State, Part I of II....
The Socialist (DEM) Party’s color is RED... as in red scarfs on Russian Children and “Red China”. Presidential candidates do not need to ‘waste’ limited funds here. Our two Senators have not represented the Republic of California in any of their years of office. They are AINO’s of both their State and Nation.
Our Districts are gerrymandered by the so-called “Citizen’s Commission of Nonpartisan Redistricting”, for example: creating districts like #51, Filner’s old District and home of Acorn in San Diego county: CRC redrew it larger size to Start at Imperial Beach - and extend south and east to the border of AZ and northward along the same Riverside-Imperial County lines, west to the edges of Anza Borrego. It is drawn solely on Community of Interest, i.e. skin color except white/country-of-origin, and most often language other than United States and California, English. While the now (Delta closed-down), Imperial County, largest agricultural growers in the United States, farms and ranches remain disenfranchised and politically absent representation in California’s Socialist State, for this 2nd 10 years 2010 to2020. Gerrymandering via ‘Socialist Party (formerly the ‘DEM’)of number by government tyranny and force’:
— by skin-color/except white/ race combined with country-of-origin/except a naturalized citizenship United States; and most often Language other than English which is the official language of our State and Nation’s Republican form of government of, by, and for “Consent of the Governed forming “By-area trustee voting systems” and removing “1620 to date At-large / consent of One Man = One Vote”;
.— by the absent, often lip service, use of department-layered down Secretary of State - force - a consequence of tyranny of the majority and of the effects of number as the determiner of good/ bad law and regulations-enforced by law absent court and “ the America Rule” of absent court ruling-attorney-adjudication by $$$$ negotiation[1].
2002 to this date – The State of California Is Not connected to the Nationwide Voter Registration Software program to prevent voter fraud – it has no intention, after 10 years of ever protecting constitutional person’s one vote by using this form of voter fraud prevention”. America First - Constitutional- “Election Integrity Project” can verify voter’s registration.
—by top two vote getters regardless of Political Party affiliation; —by the bad-law, consequences which occur from the ‘Intended’ circumstances of the above; —by preconceived conclusions of Supreme and some Superior-secular courts of law. The California Supreme Court has refused to comply the “consent of the governed’s Initiative” to have retired judges redraw the State Senate districts for June 5th election. There are a greater number of Districts with top-two voter getters DEM-DEM, than REP-REP.
— Since elimination of political party affiliation is quite impossible, witness the writers of this ridiculous Anti-law, Party’s have had to stop obeying their own bylaws to protect a “number” dividing the minority vote in such a manner that even in somewhat balanced Districts of DEM/REP philosophy by choice of ‘consent of the governed’ becomes important.
November 6, Proposition 40 allows and approves the Citizen’s Redistricting Commission redraw, partisan, (DEM)-Socialists lines to remain partisan in favor of the PREVENT the Citizen’s nonpartisan, Redistricting committee’s redrawn - State Senate Districts.
We the People in order to “ensure domestic tranquility...and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity..” have never been confronted by “Arbitrary or despotic exercise of power; the exercise of power over subjects and others with a rigor not authorized by law or justice, or not requisite for the purposes of government. Hence tyranny is often synonymous with cruelty and oppression” at Nation and Our State of California. We the people are not disposed to settle and correct wrong and evil with guns or riots — that’s for the ignorant, Democratic masses like OWS and other members of the DEM-50%-vocal-Zeitgeist members at their convention of despotism and oppression.
We the People will be voicing our “consent of the governed” on Nov. 6; but with the above — completely ‘state’ manufactured and stuffed ballot-results - already counted and just waiting for the ‘official’ declaration of death for our Republic— it just may not be possible for our voice to be the ‘Number’ needed to remove all vestiges of the tyranny-oppression-despotism of legislation, regulation and court rulings.
‘ Number in any format’ as the determiner of right and wrong allows “"All, too, will bear in mind this sacred principle, that though the will of the majority is in all cases to prevail, that will to be rightful must be reasonable; that the minority possess their equal rights, which equal law must protect, and to violate would be oppression.” (Thomas Jefferson) And “The protection provided by this principle applies fundamentally, of course, in favor of a minority of one: The Individual. No majority, however great even all of the people but one Individual--may properly infringe, or possess the power to infringe, the rights of any minority, however small--even a minority of a lone Individual”. .... This type of tyranny, by Omnipotent Majority, is always possible under any Democracy as a form of government. This is what The Framers and Ratifiers of the Constitution and their fellow American leaders meant when, in the 1787-1788 debates with regard to the framing and adoption of the Constitution, they denounced the 11 excesses of democracy. They were, of course, not criticizing popular government as such--for instance as it exists under the Republic of the United States featuring constitutionally limited government, as limited by the Constitution. They were, therefore, not condemning democracy in the general sense of the term--meaning merely a popular type of government. They were speaking in support of America's being a Republic, not a Democracy, as a form of government. The more general meaning of Democracy--popular government--also applies to America; but this use of the term is only confusing in any discussion, as here, of the characteristics of different forms of popular government: a Republic in contrast to a Democracy.”[2]
That is the reason for this Essay.
There are many, but 4 main – take Action – principles, in Jon Roland’s “Declaration of Constitutional Principles”, We the People for: 1) “Defense of the state and the constitution includes defense against threats of all kinds, including invasion or attack, insurrection, criminal acts, natural or manmade disasters, or public ignorance or apathy.”. 2)“A citizen not only has the duty to Obey the law, but to help Enforce it, within his ability, and to do what he can to Prepare himself and others to do so.”. 3) In a constitutional republic, the 1789Constitution is the supreme Law, superior to all other public acts, whether by officials or private citizens. Any statute, regulation, executive order, or court ruling which is Inconsistent with that supreme law and Not Derived from it Is Unconstitutional and Null And Void From Inception.
4) The judgement of the consistency of an official act with the constitution is called CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW. When this duty is performed by a judge, it is called Judicial Review. It is not a power of government but The Exercise of a duty of Citizenship.:
Part II following this is a “CONSTITUTIONAL REVIEW” DRAFT. Its purpose is to give US a format for First Amendment Grievance With Plan for Redress. Its format is like a Proposition: Statement of Problem, Statement of Constitutional violations, Plan to Repeal, alter, or Add the necessary areas which are “not derived from or consistent with that supreme law”.
There is one more important Principle consistently ignored, disobeyed, and disrespected which the Founders gave to “1776-1789 in November 6, 2012 Posterity of God and Nation First": “An unconstitutional statute is not a law, no matter how vigorously it many be enforced. Enforcement does not make what is enforced the law. What is enforced is a REGIME. In a constitutional republic, the law and the regime should coincide. If they do not, the Regime is not Llaw but ANTI-LAW”:
The State of California’s and of our Executive Branch with Judiciary Government is ANTI-LAW because 2009-2012-Socialist-Secular usurps 1789 Constitution’s Article VI supreme Law of the Land, Oath of Office, by removing under God as “Religion and Morality” as the basis of law in our Article IV:4 Republican form of government. By removing “Religion and Morality”, the Declaration’s Law are also removed.
Therefore, the First Table of Law is also removed: “The American philosophy, based upon this principle, is an indivisible whole and must be accepted or rejected as such. It cannot be treated piece-meal. Its fundamentals and its implicit meanings and obligations must be accepted together with its benefits. .. .
The concept of Man's spiritual nature, and the resulting concept of the supreme dignity and value of each Individual, provide the fundamental basis for each Individual's self-respect and the consequent mutual respect among Individual's. This self-respect as well as this mutual respect are the outgrowth of, and evidenced by, The Individual's maintenance of his God-given, unalienable rights. They are maintained by requiring that government and other Individuals respect them, as well as by his dedication to his own unceasing growth toward realization of his highest potential--spiritually, morally, intellectually, in every aspect of life. This is in order that he may merit maximum respect by self and by others. ...
This concept of Man's spiritual nature excludes any idea of intrusion by government into this Man-to-Man spiritual relationship. It excludes the anti-moral precept that the end justifies the means and the related idea that the means can be separated from the end when judging them morally. This concept therefore excludes necessarily any idea of attempting to do good by force--for instance, through coercion of Man by Government, whether or not claimed to be for his own good or for the so-called common good or general welfare.
It excludes disbelief in--even doubt as to the existence of--God as the Creator of Man: and therefore excludes all ideas, theories and schools of thought--however ethical and lofty in intentions--which reject affirmative and positive belief in God as Man's Creator.” [2]
While there was Not a two-thirds vote of approval from the floor of the Democratic Convention, both God and His Son Jesus main areas of Scripture – Jerusalem, were returned to the Platform, the act against our Nation cannot be removed...and remain the Statement of Socialist-Secular legislation, support of UN tyranny of borderless nations and jurisprudence, and law of all levels of the courts.
Initially, and in demonstrated actions, the Obama Regime was actually stating the overthrow of the Republic via changing “Rule of Law”; And This Has Already Occurred via removing the Judiciary as a source of Truth and Justice – because removing “Religion and Morality” / The First Table of Law removes Both Founding Documents.
Part II is for We the People singly, in established assemblies for the purpose of stating their opposition, with Both Founding Document’s Laws, and Creating the Act to remove, alter, and correct the wrongs against the Republic – One Person Protected. It is a DRAFT.
Part II is not the sole location of Americans for God and Nation First. “The United States patriots Union, LLC, Constitutional Justice division; www.PatriotsUnion.org Has performed a “callup” “A Ceclaration To Restore The Constitutional Republic”. It is an excellent statement of the Declaration’s usurpations, despotism, and tyranny with abuses of this 2009-2012 Obama Regime with assistance from the UN’s borderless nations and jurisprudence. In conjunction is www.veterandefenders.org . And I believe, last week, Glenn Beck started a “call-up”. Long and short — Duty-Honor-God-Nation — mandatory regardless of ‘number’. God’s Law in both our Founding Documents — Person Protected in Mandatory.
1. American Rule: “4. Good Ideas Spread, Bad Ones Don’t” in “Economic Lessons from American History”; John Steele Gordon; Impremis; July/August 2012; www.hillsdale.edu .
2. “The American Ideal of 1776. The Twelve Basic American Principles. 1. Spiritual is Supreme. 12. The Majority – Limited for Liberty”; Hamilton A. Long; www.lexrex.com
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment