Two Essential Reasons Our Declaration..

..and Constitution will remain at the beck and call of absolute  power, force, control ‘Opinion without interference,’ “Body Law” of  the Open Society Socialism of borderless nations and jurisprudence,   for that is what the Supreme Court decided this week:

Here is what is removed from the Laws of Both Founding Documents by using precedents:
The First 2 and Last 2 paragraphs of The Declaration with Every Article and the First 8 Amendments with the 14th of our Constitution.  The precedent law changes “of, by, and for” the hands of State, Federal levels of government..

Here are the essential reasons for the submission and subservience of both Documents:

1) All Cases are heard on a ‘precedent’ basis.

Precedent means “Legal principle, created by a court decision, which provides an example or authority for judges deciding similar issues later. Generally, decisions of higher courts (within a particular system of courts) are mandatory precedent on lower courts within that system--that is, the principle announced by a higher court must be followed in later cases. ....As a practical matter, courts can usually find precedent for any direction they want to go in deciding a particular case. Accordingly, precedent is used as often to justify a particular outcome in a case as it is to guide the decision. The body of judicial decisions in which were formulated the points of law arising in any case. A previously decided case that is considered binding in the court where it was issued and in all lower courts in the same jurisdiction. A court decision in an earlier case with facts and law similar to a dispute currently before a court. Precedent will ordinarily govern the decision of a later similar case, unless a party can show that it was wrongly decided or that it differed in some significant way.” (Lectlaw.com)

In lower courts, there is only one judge, so the precedent is much more important for attorney’s to choose – often regardless of the state of the person as plaintiff or defendant; for the Constitution over the last 64 years loses its “supremacy” to the choices of precedent presented to judge or justices.

2) Since the 70's, another, more sublte change occurred: “The Natural Rights of persons are
 inalienable, preceding the social contract and the constitution [Declaration], and persons may Not be deprived of them even with their consent, since they do not have the power to surrender those rights, and therefore do not have the power to delegate the deprivation of those rights to others.” And “Disablement of all rights other than the rights of majority may only be done by due process for individuals, Not by legislation [or regulation].”  And “Only individual persons or corporate “Persons” which are composed of individual persons may be the subject of legal process. ..” were gradually ‘precedented” out of consideration.

These constitutional principles were displaced and in doing so,  “In a constitutional republic, the constitution is the SUPREME LAW, superior to all other public acts, whether by officials or private citizens. Any statute, regulation, executive order, or court ruling which is INCONSISTENT with that supreme law and NOT DERIVED from it Is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and NULL AND VOID FROM INCEPTION.”

Also with the emphasis on Temporal Laws (English Bill of Rights), “Spiritual Laws” of Region and Morality was removed; or put another way...  Person is comprised of Body - physiological with neurological - and Soul: “The spiritual, rational and immortal substance in man, which distinguishes him from brutes; that part of man which enables him to think and reason, and which renders him a subject of moral government. The immortality of the soul is a fundamental article of the christian system.”(1828 Dictionary).

Body Law has become supreme over soul: “: “..Inanimate objects and Living Objects not capable of conducting their own defense in a court of law may Not be parties to an action in law.” dominated with the ongoing use of Precedent “..trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or invented against it...(T. Jefferson)”,  has become the definition of the Rule of Law; and this week – actually before this week –Body-Temporal Law is The Supreme Law of the Land.

With the emphasis on Body - Temporal Law, there is no reason for government as in Article III to provide Person Protection of natural rights. “The sum of all is, if we would most truly enjoy the gift of Heaven, let us become a virtuous people; then shall we both deserve and enjoy it. While, on the other hand, if we are universally vicious and debauched in our manners, though the form of our Constitution carries the Face of the most exalted Freedom, we shall in reality be the most abject slaves.”.—S. Adams

The Constitution All Americans refer and use for reference is the “Soul” law of “Spiritual Laws” based upon legal process to protect One Person’s “..separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them..” with “..truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, ...endowed by their Creator..” with natural rights. It is the “Soul” as conscience which Both Founding Documents are written to Protect from government’s Body-Temporal Laws; because.

 the Laws of Temporal - Body solely recognized: 1)  groups of people defined by government with government’s decision as to what comprises the groups, told to the people within the confines society, and membership within the group defines its members as both excluded and included– “Society determines what marriage is.”; 2)  inanimate objects including air–CO2, O2,. Land, water, plastic bags, plastic cups, all minerals, plants, nuclear and atoms flowing as transmitters of wireless communication, and virtually any object, tool, function of money, food, reflected as the Executive Branches’s 2600 Agencies. Like “Government” “Agency’s” are non-entities comprised of people appointed, assigned, and hired; 3) Living Objects are the physiological functioning parts of the human body including skin to cover, ingestion, excrement, sex, neurology for these organs to function, animals - endangered species, plants - also endanger species.

Precedent helps Temporal law due to the more Precedents to choose from...the further away from “Religion and Morality” of spiritual law..Laws Protecting sovereignty of Person, State, and Nation. Courts travel with their attorneys and determiners of adjudication of precedent — not the Articles and Amendments of the Constitution of the United States sworn to uphold — The first renunciation of ‘spiritual law’ - Oath given by One to their God.– or Affirmation of Righteousness as morality, Articles II and VI,   “for those who do not recognize a supreme Lawgiver” (1828 Dictionary).

Thus when speaking of people who enter our Nation’s borders in violation of our Federal Laws, privileges and immunities are given by E.O. supported by Appointees who frankly have no intention of obedience to “Rule of Law”; and courts do not throw the Federal Government out of Court for their mismanagement of the Borders, have Constitutional responsibility and accountability for.  The court just ‘selects’ parts of the Arizona Law to make unconstitutional. Word game - inconsistent and not derived from that supreme law is unconstitutional... The Federal Government – the President who required the US Attorney General to take this case to court... are not told the 10th Amendment and not held accountable for government wrong-doing in law...

When speaking of “Patient Protection and Affordable Act” – only the commerce clause???? That entire document is completely unconstitutional: Article IV:4 – Republican form of Protection of One from the Majority government is guaranteed.  

Article V is violated because of changing the form of government to group/social who negates Person as One Individual the component of our Constitution without obedience to the Amending process.  That means representation - not just elected - also consent of the governed – to protect unalienable rights is removed.  One entire Party in House and In Senate with 26 members of the opposition party – and each individual from each District and State of Each one of those Representatives ---- Did Not Sign This Bill —.! It is Not law.    Congress means “A meeting of individuals; an assembly of envoys, commissioners, deputies, &c., particularly a meeting of the representatives of several courts, to concert measures for their common good, or to adjust their mutual concerns.”.  Patient Protection and Affordable Act was, and is, 100% Absent any “concert of measures for their common good”. Concert means: “Agreement of two or more in a design or plan; union formed by mutual communication of opinions and views; accordance in a scheme; harmony.”.  That is the reason at least 2 members of an opposing party to a Bill, must sign that Bill Before Article I:7 “..shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall..”.Filibuster is a Republican form of government which states that each-one-person’s voice in Politics the science of ethics of governance among men taking sides and philosophy’s on issues must be heard... and in formal debate...minority wins because “spiritual Law” or Truth is above Number or majority ...
Commerce 1828:   “In a general sense, an interchange or mutual change of goods, wares, productions, or property of any kind, between nations or individuals, either by barter, or by purchase and sale; trade; traffic. Commerce is foreign or inland. Foreign commerce is the trade which one nation carries on with another; inland commerce, or inland trade, is the trade in the exchange of commodities between citizens of the same nation or state. Active commerce”  
 Insurance, an inanimate object of paper, used as party at law, to force compliance of Persons of Constitution to trade with government – no choice.... is not consistent and not derived from that supreme law Is Unconstitutional and Null and Void from Inception...

There is also the inanimate object number as “statistics” to determine which Person of the Constitution obtains what care, under what circumstances within the hierarchy of ‘statistical medical diagnoses of acute, chronic, multisystem diseases processes!

Again, the court picks and chooses what part of the Anti-law they will allow to be adjudicated upon.... Only group of persons - ill, healthy, young not requiring medical care at all; and inanimate objects all production and distribution of goods and services for that group called ill.  Not the Person as One... with the skills of physician as One or one among specialties — the group named ill defined and control by state.

 5 to 4, inanimate object ‘number’ is irrelevant to the Anti-law contained in patient Protection and Affordable Act which is a lie delivered in the Title absent “spiritual Law”. Thou shalt not bear false witness.”

Society of government definition has decided to change life, liberty and pursuit of happiness for One Person.....to Equity in which society decides who gets what result from “opinion without interference”.  This use of definition of ‘equity’ does not include “impartial” nor does it include non-partisan. It shall make and use judgement for its own “opinion without interference” of history, science, fact unless those resources support its Opinion without interference. Thus CO2 trading of Air is upheld in court as perfectly reasonable to “Opinion without interference” of the absent Truth named “Global Warming”.

Equity means: “ Justice; right. In practice, equity is the impartial distribution of justice, or the doing that to another which the laws of God and man, and of reason, give him a right to claim. It is the treating of a person according to justice and reason.”

Liberty means “ Civil liberty, is the liberty of men in a state of society, or natural liberty, so far only abridged and restrained, as is necessary and expedient for the safety and interest of the society, state or nation. A restraint of natural liberty, not necessary or expedient for the public, is tyranny or oppression. civil liberty is an exemption from the arbitrary will of others, which exemption is secured by established laws, which restrain every man from injuring or controlling another. Hence the restraints of law are essential to civil liberty.”
 [Thanks to Dennis Prager for this insight into Open Society Socialism - borderless nations and jurisprudence, in his New Book “Still the Best Hope: Why the World Needs American Values to Triumph” on Mark Levin Show last night.]



[This looks like 2,036 words, but minus the definitions used and principles; it is actually 1, 306 words.  I do try not to be long-winded! ]