The Voter"s ‘Doorknocker’

Information for Voter’s cards are out and will be delivered to your door starting Saturday.  The Candidates are 100% supported by everyone.   But Not So....

The PROPOSITIONS.  Since Propositions are written by the current Government-over-man-2009-2012-Collective-secular-Party of control, power and force’ violating and disregarding our Nation’s Republican form of Government under 1789 Constitution of “One Person” protected from government and “Oath of Office” – duty, Honor, Service of That Elected-One-Person’s Article II and VI “Oath of Office”;

HERE ARE THE Many, if not most SD TEAPARTY with FRANK KACER’S “KACER’S CALL” from Christian Citizenship Council[1] – Next to the Republican Party:

INCREASE TAX PROPOSITIONS 30, 38, 39 “NO”:  CAGOP, TEAPARTIES, AND KACER’S CALLS.
“30 TEMPORARY TAXES TO FUND EDUCATION. GUARANTEED LOCAL PUBLIC          SAFETY FUNDING. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT”;
“38 TAX TO FUND EDUCATION AND EARLY CHILDHOOD PROGRAMS. INITIATIVE             STATUTE.”
“39 TAX TREATMENT FOR MULTISTATE BUSINESSES. CLEAN ENERGY AND
       ENERGY EFFICIENCY FUNDING. INITIATIVE STATUTE.

PROPOSITION 31:  STATE BUDGET. STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT. INITIATIVE             CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT AND STATUTE.
“NO” TEAPARTIES; KACER’S CALL: Part I of II separate parts: State Budget.: Kacer:  “If current budget cycle can’t address near term economic upheavals, how will 2 year budget account for uncertainty (James 4:13-14). Part II of II: False Premise on role of government: “promote prosperous economy, quality environment; “community equity” also “increasing employment, improving education, decreasing poverty, decreasing crime and improving health (Rom 13:1-6; 1 Peter 2:14; justice and order). Wrong government roles mandated down to levels thru “Community Strategic Action Plans.”.
“YES” CAGOP - The community strategic action plans are a good idea---- Richard Ryder; Ramona Tea’d; Saturday Sept. 29..
PROPOSITION 33: AUTO INSURANCE COMPANIES. PRICES BASED ON DRIVER’S HISTORY OF INSURANCE COVERAGE. INITIATIVE STATUTE.
“NO” TEAPARTY: Creates a ‘Collective’ named those persons, who are included in “90 days for any reason”, do not have “equal protection under the law” from increased rates because they could fall outside of the 90 days and the reasons are varied as the individuals involved - there is no reason for this discrepancy to be written into law.  Example: Illness or Post-op; out of country.....
Changes Republican form of government Protection of One Person, – to homo sapiens as a member of the collective with inanimate object: ‘time’ as “ Greater-than 90 days - not specified”.
“YES”: CAGOP doesn’t give explanations.  KACER’S CALL does state the “Consider: Not all possible conditions can be accounted for (Eccl 9:11).

PREPOSITIONS 34 “DEATH PENALTY. INITIATIVE STATUTE.  36: “ THREE STRIKES LAW. REPEAT FELONY OFFENDERS. PENALTIES. INITIATIVE STATUTE
“NO” CAGOP, KACER’S CALL, TEAPARTY.  READ Because THESE ARE IMPORT TO understand for our Republican form of government under the Laws of Both Founding Documents: “Religion and Morality”:
Frank Kacer states it the best: “34 Concerns: Very sensitive issue. Many practical problems (justified and unjustified costs; time delays) shouldn’t trump justice. Extreme limitations on capital punishment already inhibit justice for victim and families.  Consider: Murder uniquely defiles our land (Gen 4:10; Num 35: 30-33). Justice is a foundational principle (Prov 21:15) and is to be proportional not vengeful (Deut 19: 15-21). Sanctity of own life forfeited by murder (Gen 9: 5-6; Ex 20:13). Executing murderers a legitimate government duty (Rom 13:4). Life sentence prolongs justice & creates more issues (Eccl 8:11). Life In fallen world not risk free (wars, car accidents, etc.)(Eccl 9:11). If innocent, life sentence also unjust (Prov 18:5).”
“36" Kacer’s Call: “Concern: Amends ‘94 Prop 184 3-Strikes law. Proposed revisions are very cumbersome and difficult to understand. Attorney General’s analysis and text of measure are difficult to reconcile (1Cor 14:33). Consider: When laws are unclear with complex exceptions, opportunities exist for abuse and inconsistency if lax judicial climate exists (1Cor 14:8). Attorney general states current courts may choose (in some instances) to ignore prior felonies (defeats 3-strike intent). Affect of this measure is very unclear, needs to be simpler with greater focus.”.
34 and 36: In our Republic, Law is based on One Person’s Soul. Not his body.[Person is composed of body and soul.]  Three-strikes anything repudiates the Soul of a Person; and because law is collective, not One individual, there is no way that Justice in Truth can be served.
The Republican form of Government “Religion and Morality” Declaration and Constitution: 1) When convicted, the Person becomes a member of the collective “incarcerated people”. Along with this, the individual loses ALL Bill of Rights and becomes the ‘Pawn’ of the attorneys and authorities-over-the person.  When the judiciary, government, and society as a collective,  loses its relationship to “Religion and Morality”, there is No forgiveness – as reflected in the 5th, 6th, and 8th Amendments.
That means once incarcerated, jobs are nearly impossible and ALL require abandonment of “witness against himself – the case being: “If you want to work here, or have a License or Permit to work, you shall disclose all your criminal history.  Recidivism becomes the Rule of Law against the individual — he/she often have no choice, regarding the rest of their lives — other offenses have much higher probability.
2) The person is enslaved for life. That also means that government-over-man, shall provides all requirements for the basic life requirements plus the guarding and ‘special’ handling of ‘problem’ incarcerated felons’ ----- The Cost, including the closed-shop-union-pension-costs are prohibitive.  Then add the costs of incarcerating Proposition 35 Human Trafficking.  “Incarcerated” should become self-sustaining... and the prison is the bedroom, not the Activities of Daily Living  room. There are individuals who have paid for their crimes, and would like another chance at doing right —they shall never have one under government-over-man; even in One Person-at-a-time law – it is difficult; but many have....and don’t forget the stories of those returned to court after umpteen years of righteous living, albeit, often in seclusion from public eye, but that is OK also. Each Person’s Soul is ONLY accountable to God — wherever on the continuum between Lucifer and Jesus they live; and totally absent any physical-bodily-worldly affects and effects! That is why “and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of nature and of Nature’s God ENTITLE THEM,”.   [One prison guard reports “It is cheaper to make life in prison vs. the courts costs of the numerous appeals (of, by, and for the attorneys). As if the inanimate ‘dollar’ is much more important than the collective incarcerated homo sapien.]
While not excusing evil of a Felon, Three-Strikes, anything is probably the most cruel law ever conceived and written.
PROPOSITION 35  HUMAN TRAFFICKING. PENALTIES. INITIATIVE STATUTE.
“YES” CAGOP, KACER’S CALL, TEAPARTY.  Kacer’s Call does point out: “Unfortunately, no restitution to the Victims (Ex 22),. Fines ALL go to services and law enforcement ONLY.”
[Support for the government — not the victims?!!!!!]

PROPOSITION 37 GENETICALLY ENGINEERED FOODS. LABELING. INITIATIVE STATUTE.
“NO” CAGOP, KACER’S CALL, TEAPARTY:
Republican form of Government: Would not be dealing with this because the marketplace tends to self-correct, and at all junctures of advancements in living objects, there are naysayer -especially in courts.  It is important for ‘consent of the governed’ to know:
Government-over-man via GW, EPA, AB32, skin colr/country-of-origin other than the USA, of City, water, and school Districts - California Voting Rights Act; and Attorney’s, — but especially the current Administration of Executive Department Czars as minions to Executive Order — use the “AMERICAN PLAN” against Person, corporate Persons, businesses and any and all aspect of ‘controlled life, liberty:
From “Economic Lessons from American History [2]”:   “The American Rule was a relatively minor anomaly in our legal system until the mid-20th century. But since then, as lawyers’ ethics changed and they became much more active in seeking cases, the American Rule has proved an engine of litigation. For every malpractice case filed in 1960, for instance, 300 are filed today. In practice, the American Rule has become an open invitation, frequently accepted, to legal extortion: “Pay us $25,000 to go away or spend $250,000 to defend yourself successfully in court. Your choice.”

Trial lawyers defend the American Rule fiercely. They also make more political contributions, mostly to Democrats, than any other set of donors except labor unions. One of their main arguments for the status quo is that the vast number of lawsuits from which they profit so handsomely force doctors, manufacturers, and others to be more careful than they otherwise might be. Private lawsuits, these lawyers maintain, police the public marketplace by going after bad guys so the government doesn't have to-a curious assertion, given that policing the marketplace has long been considered a quintessential function of government.
There is not another country in the common-law world that uses it. Indeed, the only other country on the planet that has a version of the American Rule is Japan, where a very different legal system makes it extremely difficult to get into court at all. ....
The United States has more lawyers and more lawsuits, per capita, than any other country. But lawsuits don’t create wealth, they only transfer it from one party to another, with lawyers taking a big cut along the way. Few things would help the American economy more than ending the American Rule. ..”.
Thus, law becomes a matter of legal blackmail, coercion, facility and expediency — never justice or principles.
PROPOSITION 40  REDISTRICTING. STATE SENATE DISTRICTS. REFERENDUM.
“NO” TEAPARTIERS. The maps at the back of your “Official Voter Information Guide” demonstrate the ‘Gerrymander’ of the Senate Districts. See pages: 132, Senate District #4; pg. 133, Senate District #8; pg. 135 - Senate District #15 and 16; pg. 143 #39 Sports Arena to Poway:
The little fingerlings, notches, and zigzags are flags of gerrymandering.  There is no Opposition argument;  but..
.. this Initiative - We the Residents in the Precincts affected by the Gerrymandered Districts, put this Initiative on the Ballot because the “Citizens Redistricting Commission(CRC)” is not and did not carry-out non-partisan drawing of the Senate Districts.   “The “NO” vote allows the California Supreme Court to appoint “special masters” to establish new Senate District Boundaries. In the past , the court has appointed retired judges to serve as special masters.”.
“YES” CAGOP; Kacer’s Call: Both believe it is “virtually impossible to guarantee creation of equitable election district boundaries no matter what approach is used because of legislative bias of the past and of CRC bias affecting our “Consent of the Governed” today.
REBUTTAL to ‘Yes’: 1)  The CRC was approached and requested to look into and replace...THE SAME 10+ YEAR OLD, BERKELEY SOFTWARE USED BY THE LEGISLATORS IN 2000. CRC categorically Refused.
2) There at least two other Software companies which perform and have performed equitable Districts with Precincts to provide 1Vote:1Person “..shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State,..”.
One is located in Virginia, Election Data Services; Kimbell Brace, and has drawn the Districts for most of the South East States.  The Other is in Texas. It has two parts for it drawing of Districts.
3) In San Diego County, there is One Software Program which layers the 10 different kinds of Districts that comprise “consent of the governed”, it’s mathematics is unquestioned — if the human input is equitable... California Voting Rights Act, does not contain the FVRA’s if it is not a problem – don’t fix it Section. It demands a “by area trustee voting district” be created but can be avoided by utilizing the above mentioned “American Plan” which, after Modesto, most city and school boards do submit to the attorney’s law.
4) The reason ‘consent of the governed has 3 Tax increase bills on ballots is that the government-over-man Majority, of force as determiners of right and wrong, can be stopped by the minority party because the Representatives of ‘consent of the governed’ have exactly the correct number to Not Allow the two-thirds majority to pass a tax increase. [That is what is being removed in Proposition 31]
5) CRC’s, Communities of Interest (COI) were determined based on the Federal Voting Rights Act, but absent this fact, of FVRA: Sec. 3(a)..Provided, That the court need Not authorize the appointment of examiners if any incidents of denial or abridgement of the right to vote on account of race or color (1) have been few in number and have been promptly and effectively corrected by State and local action, (2) the continuing effect of such incidents has been eliminated, and (3) there is no reasonable probability of their recurrence in the future.”            
This is important! Here’s why in CA Constitution, Article II”:5(a)(b) the “top two vote getters regardless of political party affiliation” are  DEM-DEM Districts. That means that Republicans either do not vote for that office; or they vote for the lesser of two evils....either way, It is Not the 1789 Constitution’s Article IV:4 “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government”; and “There is no maxim..which is more liable to be misapplied, and which therefore needs elucidation than the current one that the interest of the majority is the political standard of right and wrong....In fact it is only reestablishing under another name and a more specious form, Force as the measure of right..” —James Monroe .
So, as boring as the Propositions may seem, they are mandatory to pay attention to, simply because of the removal and omnipotent government-over-man of this State and of our Nation....absent Both Founding Documents!  Please also understand, if you have a family member under 40, who went only to public school, though it is present in some of the Catholic Schools also, they have not One Clue – what a Republican Form of government is and why Their Unique, No-one will ever be just like them, Soul — This Is The Only Nation In The History Of Mankind to have One Person accountable to God both in Religion and Morality ... and in Law of Nature and of Nature’s God.

 
1. Frankkacer@hotmail.com
2. By John Steele Gordon; Imprimis; July/August 2012; www.hillsdale.edu; Imprimis archive.

Ludwig Von Mises and NO on Propositions 31 and N:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/artcarden/2012/09/29/the-greatest-thinker-youve-never-read-ludwig-von-mises/   from FB news feed:  go read it...it is really tremendous:-)

“Ludwig Von Mises’s greatest contribution: his demonstration that socialism cannot function as a rational economic system and that private ownership of the means of production is necessary if value is going to be maximized and waste is going to be minimized in the production process.  And

Mises started–and in my humble opinion, ended–the debate over whether an economic system based on common or social ownership of the means of production could function with his essay “Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth.” He demonstrated that it was impossible to know whether a particular production process was wise (resource-optimizing) or unwise (resource-wasting) in the absence of prices for the means of production. “(by Art Carden).

Richard Ryder, Ch. San Diego Tax fighters and Rostra, gave a wonderful talk regarding the current, anti-person any walk of business or private employment, taxation is the only source of revenue, especially in our ‘state’ of government-over-man-Collective Secular*.

When he spoke of Proposition 31, he spoke with the CAGOP in agreement to the Secular-Socialist re-write of our “State Budget. State and Local Government. Initiative. Constitutional Law.”, he felt the cities getting together to form “community strategic action plans”, though he didn’t use that designation in speaking, was a good idea.  It was a relief to know it wasn’t the Progressive-feathers of “party-established faction” and the reason behind the support.

This was one area of few Proposition disagreements between the Teapartier’s, many individuals and the CAGOP.

It appears 1) that water districts are joining together – obeying State Laws, but otherwise independent of State anything; 2) Some, Frank Kacer, who like this Proposition, don’t realize — the implications to our Republican form of government vs. “Secular-Socialist-collectivism- absent respect for person, persons which comprise City, and any accountability in governance to itself in the firm belief that top-down government-over-man; the second paragraph above;  is not regarded or reflected in deciding to support Propositions 31/N in Escondido.

 REFLECT & RELATE, especially the Second paragraph, to Proposition 31.

 -- The 'state'-collective-secular will require the formation of a “Department of Cooperatives” between cities with employee's and overhead that Department's cost must be taken by each city to run and manage the legalities of the coop!  Closed-shop public employee union, pension's costs-never accounted for even though it is an essential - growing upon itself cost; and all ramifications Individual Persons comprising a corporate persons under the 9th and 10th Amendments.  In our dwindling private business, revenue for State Coffers, top-down government-over-man of Force and Control. See Sac. Bee for closing of an old hamburger stand, apparently because of absent handicap access; downward into the TarPitt of Bureaucracy making and enforcing law...not regulation — there is an important difference!

Proposition 31 and the First paragraph, cities  evolve from the world of private business and enterprise..... NOT FROM THE "Never, Never let a Fact get in the way of a Preconceived Conclusion: -- "General Plans" of Areas by re-zoning allowed building – in the future with the direction and assisted by the ever-present EPA utilizing “The American Plan” threat of EIR every step of the way.

These "triplets" relate and reflect in Proposition 31 with AB32 of El Cajon, San Marcos, Encinitas, and Escondido's Proposition N: "General Plans"; also,  New Zealand, GB, Switzerland;  and all the 'borderless nations and jurisprudence of UN's “Agenda 21 - Section I SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC DIMENSIONS:7    Promoting sustainable human settlement development'; 5.Demographic dynamics and sustainability; 4. Changing consumption patterns; 8. Integrating environment and development in decision-making.  SECTION II. CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCES FOR DEVELOPMENT: 16.  Environmentally sound management of biotechnology; 9. Protection of the atmosphere; 10. Integrated approach to the planning and management of land resources. “(Agenda 21;  http://www.un.org/esa/dsd/agenda21/res_agenda21_00.shtml)

In other words, the "State", especially the 'state' of this anti-1776 Declaration and 1789 Constitution, HAS NO BUSINESS INSTILLING ITS PRESENCE INTO THE BUSINESS OF EACH CITY/ CORPORATE PERSON or declaring that "coop" relationship as part of the re-write of The California Constitution as a Two Year budget by the 'state' of government-over-man-secular disguised as if it were responsible and demonstrated intrinsic "Religion and Morality" of Oath of Office!

VOTE NO on PROPOSITION 31 -- It continues Bad governance to disastrous governance.


*Secular means “.. principle of separation of government institutions, and the persons mandated to represent the State, from religious institutions and religious dignitaries. In one sense, secularism may assert the right to be free from religious rule and teachings, and the right to freedom from governmental imposition of religion upon the people within a state that is neutral on matters of belief..

 Therefore, Secular also means the Laws of the Declaration: “and assume among the powers of the earth the separate and equal Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God..entitled to; unalienable rights....among the whole of the Contents; and 1789 The Rule of Law, Articles II and VI - Oath of Office (affirmation) are Not True nor Binding to any Person espousing their ‘free agency’ to deny God’s Laws.

That is exactly what we are witnessing at the UN General Assembly, The same San Francisco Attorney Group who wrote Props 30, 31, 38, and 39; assisted on many of the other Propositions --- Notably Not  32 or 40!