The Voter"s ‘Doorknocker’

Information for Voter’s cards are out and will be delivered to your door starting Saturday.  The Candidates are 100% supported by everyone.   But Not So....

The PROPOSITIONS.  Since Propositions are written by the current Government-over-man-2009-2012-Collective-secular-Party of control, power and force’ violating and disregarding our Nation’s Republican form of Government under 1789 Constitution of “One Person” protected from government and “Oath of Office” – duty, Honor, Service of That Elected-One-Person’s Article II and VI “Oath of Office”;

HERE ARE THE Many, if not most SD TEAPARTY with FRANK KACER’S “KACER’S CALL” from Christian Citizenship Council[1] – Next to the Republican Party:

INCREASE TAX PROPOSITIONS 30, 38, 39 “NO”:  CAGOP, TEAPARTIES, AND KACER’S CALLS.
“30 TEMPORARY TAXES TO FUND EDUCATION. GUARANTEED LOCAL PUBLIC          SAFETY FUNDING. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT”;
“38 TAX TO FUND EDUCATION AND EARLY CHILDHOOD PROGRAMS. INITIATIVE             STATUTE.”
“39 TAX TREATMENT FOR MULTISTATE BUSINESSES. CLEAN ENERGY AND
       ENERGY EFFICIENCY FUNDING. INITIATIVE STATUTE.

PROPOSITION 31:  STATE BUDGET. STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT. INITIATIVE             CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT AND STATUTE.
“NO” TEAPARTIES; KACER’S CALL: Part I of II separate parts: State Budget.: Kacer:  “If current budget cycle can’t address near term economic upheavals, how will 2 year budget account for uncertainty (James 4:13-14). Part II of II: False Premise on role of government: “promote prosperous economy, quality environment; “community equity” also “increasing employment, improving education, decreasing poverty, decreasing crime and improving health (Rom 13:1-6; 1 Peter 2:14; justice and order). Wrong government roles mandated down to levels thru “Community Strategic Action Plans.”.
“YES” CAGOP - The community strategic action plans are a good idea---- Richard Ryder; Ramona Tea’d; Saturday Sept. 29..
PROPOSITION 33: AUTO INSURANCE COMPANIES. PRICES BASED ON DRIVER’S HISTORY OF INSURANCE COVERAGE. INITIATIVE STATUTE.
“NO” TEAPARTY: Creates a ‘Collective’ named those persons, who are included in “90 days for any reason”, do not have “equal protection under the law” from increased rates because they could fall outside of the 90 days and the reasons are varied as the individuals involved - there is no reason for this discrepancy to be written into law.  Example: Illness or Post-op; out of country.....
Changes Republican form of government Protection of One Person, – to homo sapiens as a member of the collective with inanimate object: ‘time’ as “ Greater-than 90 days - not specified”.
“YES”: CAGOP doesn’t give explanations.  KACER’S CALL does state the “Consider: Not all possible conditions can be accounted for (Eccl 9:11).

PREPOSITIONS 34 “DEATH PENALTY. INITIATIVE STATUTE.  36: “ THREE STRIKES LAW. REPEAT FELONY OFFENDERS. PENALTIES. INITIATIVE STATUTE
“NO” CAGOP, KACER’S CALL, TEAPARTY.  READ Because THESE ARE IMPORT TO understand for our Republican form of government under the Laws of Both Founding Documents: “Religion and Morality”:
Frank Kacer states it the best: “34 Concerns: Very sensitive issue. Many practical problems (justified and unjustified costs; time delays) shouldn’t trump justice. Extreme limitations on capital punishment already inhibit justice for victim and families.  Consider: Murder uniquely defiles our land (Gen 4:10; Num 35: 30-33). Justice is a foundational principle (Prov 21:15) and is to be proportional not vengeful (Deut 19: 15-21). Sanctity of own life forfeited by murder (Gen 9: 5-6; Ex 20:13). Executing murderers a legitimate government duty (Rom 13:4). Life sentence prolongs justice & creates more issues (Eccl 8:11). Life In fallen world not risk free (wars, car accidents, etc.)(Eccl 9:11). If innocent, life sentence also unjust (Prov 18:5).”
“36" Kacer’s Call: “Concern: Amends ‘94 Prop 184 3-Strikes law. Proposed revisions are very cumbersome and difficult to understand. Attorney General’s analysis and text of measure are difficult to reconcile (1Cor 14:33). Consider: When laws are unclear with complex exceptions, opportunities exist for abuse and inconsistency if lax judicial climate exists (1Cor 14:8). Attorney general states current courts may choose (in some instances) to ignore prior felonies (defeats 3-strike intent). Affect of this measure is very unclear, needs to be simpler with greater focus.”.
34 and 36: In our Republic, Law is based on One Person’s Soul. Not his body.[Person is composed of body and soul.]  Three-strikes anything repudiates the Soul of a Person; and because law is collective, not One individual, there is no way that Justice in Truth can be served.
The Republican form of Government “Religion and Morality” Declaration and Constitution: 1) When convicted, the Person becomes a member of the collective “incarcerated people”. Along with this, the individual loses ALL Bill of Rights and becomes the ‘Pawn’ of the attorneys and authorities-over-the person.  When the judiciary, government, and society as a collective,  loses its relationship to “Religion and Morality”, there is No forgiveness – as reflected in the 5th, 6th, and 8th Amendments.
That means once incarcerated, jobs are nearly impossible and ALL require abandonment of “witness against himself – the case being: “If you want to work here, or have a License or Permit to work, you shall disclose all your criminal history.  Recidivism becomes the Rule of Law against the individual — he/she often have no choice, regarding the rest of their lives — other offenses have much higher probability.
2) The person is enslaved for life. That also means that government-over-man, shall provides all requirements for the basic life requirements plus the guarding and ‘special’ handling of ‘problem’ incarcerated felons’ ----- The Cost, including the closed-shop-union-pension-costs are prohibitive.  Then add the costs of incarcerating Proposition 35 Human Trafficking.  “Incarcerated” should become self-sustaining... and the prison is the bedroom, not the Activities of Daily Living  room. There are individuals who have paid for their crimes, and would like another chance at doing right —they shall never have one under government-over-man; even in One Person-at-a-time law – it is difficult; but many have....and don’t forget the stories of those returned to court after umpteen years of righteous living, albeit, often in seclusion from public eye, but that is OK also. Each Person’s Soul is ONLY accountable to God — wherever on the continuum between Lucifer and Jesus they live; and totally absent any physical-bodily-worldly affects and effects! That is why “and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of nature and of Nature’s God ENTITLE THEM,”.   [One prison guard reports “It is cheaper to make life in prison vs. the courts costs of the numerous appeals (of, by, and for the attorneys). As if the inanimate ‘dollar’ is much more important than the collective incarcerated homo sapien.]
While not excusing evil of a Felon, Three-Strikes, anything is probably the most cruel law ever conceived and written.
PROPOSITION 35  HUMAN TRAFFICKING. PENALTIES. INITIATIVE STATUTE.
“YES” CAGOP, KACER’S CALL, TEAPARTY.  Kacer’s Call does point out: “Unfortunately, no restitution to the Victims (Ex 22),. Fines ALL go to services and law enforcement ONLY.”
[Support for the government — not the victims?!!!!!]

PROPOSITION 37 GENETICALLY ENGINEERED FOODS. LABELING. INITIATIVE STATUTE.
“NO” CAGOP, KACER’S CALL, TEAPARTY:
Republican form of Government: Would not be dealing with this because the marketplace tends to self-correct, and at all junctures of advancements in living objects, there are naysayer -especially in courts.  It is important for ‘consent of the governed’ to know:
Government-over-man via GW, EPA, AB32, skin colr/country-of-origin other than the USA, of City, water, and school Districts - California Voting Rights Act; and Attorney’s, — but especially the current Administration of Executive Department Czars as minions to Executive Order — use the “AMERICAN PLAN” against Person, corporate Persons, businesses and any and all aspect of ‘controlled life, liberty:
From “Economic Lessons from American History [2]”:   “The American Rule was a relatively minor anomaly in our legal system until the mid-20th century. But since then, as lawyers’ ethics changed and they became much more active in seeking cases, the American Rule has proved an engine of litigation. For every malpractice case filed in 1960, for instance, 300 are filed today. In practice, the American Rule has become an open invitation, frequently accepted, to legal extortion: “Pay us $25,000 to go away or spend $250,000 to defend yourself successfully in court. Your choice.”

Trial lawyers defend the American Rule fiercely. They also make more political contributions, mostly to Democrats, than any other set of donors except labor unions. One of their main arguments for the status quo is that the vast number of lawsuits from which they profit so handsomely force doctors, manufacturers, and others to be more careful than they otherwise might be. Private lawsuits, these lawyers maintain, police the public marketplace by going after bad guys so the government doesn't have to-a curious assertion, given that policing the marketplace has long been considered a quintessential function of government.
There is not another country in the common-law world that uses it. Indeed, the only other country on the planet that has a version of the American Rule is Japan, where a very different legal system makes it extremely difficult to get into court at all. ....
The United States has more lawyers and more lawsuits, per capita, than any other country. But lawsuits don’t create wealth, they only transfer it from one party to another, with lawyers taking a big cut along the way. Few things would help the American economy more than ending the American Rule. ..”.
Thus, law becomes a matter of legal blackmail, coercion, facility and expediency — never justice or principles.
PROPOSITION 40  REDISTRICTING. STATE SENATE DISTRICTS. REFERENDUM.
“NO” TEAPARTIERS. The maps at the back of your “Official Voter Information Guide” demonstrate the ‘Gerrymander’ of the Senate Districts. See pages: 132, Senate District #4; pg. 133, Senate District #8; pg. 135 - Senate District #15 and 16; pg. 143 #39 Sports Arena to Poway:
The little fingerlings, notches, and zigzags are flags of gerrymandering.  There is no Opposition argument;  but..
.. this Initiative - We the Residents in the Precincts affected by the Gerrymandered Districts, put this Initiative on the Ballot because the “Citizens Redistricting Commission(CRC)” is not and did not carry-out non-partisan drawing of the Senate Districts.   “The “NO” vote allows the California Supreme Court to appoint “special masters” to establish new Senate District Boundaries. In the past , the court has appointed retired judges to serve as special masters.”.
“YES” CAGOP; Kacer’s Call: Both believe it is “virtually impossible to guarantee creation of equitable election district boundaries no matter what approach is used because of legislative bias of the past and of CRC bias affecting our “Consent of the Governed” today.
REBUTTAL to ‘Yes’: 1)  The CRC was approached and requested to look into and replace...THE SAME 10+ YEAR OLD, BERKELEY SOFTWARE USED BY THE LEGISLATORS IN 2000. CRC categorically Refused.
2) There at least two other Software companies which perform and have performed equitable Districts with Precincts to provide 1Vote:1Person “..shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State,..”.
One is located in Virginia, Election Data Services; Kimbell Brace, and has drawn the Districts for most of the South East States.  The Other is in Texas. It has two parts for it drawing of Districts.
3) In San Diego County, there is One Software Program which layers the 10 different kinds of Districts that comprise “consent of the governed”, it’s mathematics is unquestioned — if the human input is equitable... California Voting Rights Act, does not contain the FVRA’s if it is not a problem – don’t fix it Section. It demands a “by area trustee voting district” be created but can be avoided by utilizing the above mentioned “American Plan” which, after Modesto, most city and school boards do submit to the attorney’s law.
4) The reason ‘consent of the governed has 3 Tax increase bills on ballots is that the government-over-man Majority, of force as determiners of right and wrong, can be stopped by the minority party because the Representatives of ‘consent of the governed’ have exactly the correct number to Not Allow the two-thirds majority to pass a tax increase. [That is what is being removed in Proposition 31]
5) CRC’s, Communities of Interest (COI) were determined based on the Federal Voting Rights Act, but absent this fact, of FVRA: Sec. 3(a)..Provided, That the court need Not authorize the appointment of examiners if any incidents of denial or abridgement of the right to vote on account of race or color (1) have been few in number and have been promptly and effectively corrected by State and local action, (2) the continuing effect of such incidents has been eliminated, and (3) there is no reasonable probability of their recurrence in the future.”            
This is important! Here’s why in CA Constitution, Article II”:5(a)(b) the “top two vote getters regardless of political party affiliation” are  DEM-DEM Districts. That means that Republicans either do not vote for that office; or they vote for the lesser of two evils....either way, It is Not the 1789 Constitution’s Article IV:4 “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government”; and “There is no maxim..which is more liable to be misapplied, and which therefore needs elucidation than the current one that the interest of the majority is the political standard of right and wrong....In fact it is only reestablishing under another name and a more specious form, Force as the measure of right..” —James Monroe .
So, as boring as the Propositions may seem, they are mandatory to pay attention to, simply because of the removal and omnipotent government-over-man of this State and of our Nation....absent Both Founding Documents!  Please also understand, if you have a family member under 40, who went only to public school, though it is present in some of the Catholic Schools also, they have not One Clue – what a Republican Form of government is and why Their Unique, No-one will ever be just like them, Soul — This Is The Only Nation In The History Of Mankind to have One Person accountable to God both in Religion and Morality ... and in Law of Nature and of Nature’s God.

 
1. Frankkacer@hotmail.com
2. By John Steele Gordon; Imprimis; July/August 2012; www.hillsdale.edu; Imprimis archive.

Part II of II: This Election is All About Honor..

Listened to a talk about the Constitution and locations in Scripture where its contents remain connected. In the talk, The Constitution was used as the basis for most of the Scripture references; but absent Article II and Article VI - Oath of Office.

The Declaration was mentioned once - then solely in relation to inalienable rights... That is the common opinion of “elected and many We the People’s,” over the years since 1947's Everson v. New York Board of Edu.- “Impenetrable wall of separation” mythology of “forgotten American soul:  “These resolutions contained the following stirring appeal, to be always solicitous of moral obligation stemming from the fact that, in any period, the living generation is only temporary trustee of the just heritage of Posterity (emphasis per original)[1]:

"Honour, justice and humanity call upon us to hold, and to transmit to our posterity, that liberty, which we received from our ancestors. It is not our duty to leave wealth to our children: but it is our duty, to leave liberty to them. No infamy, iniquity, or cruelty [2], can exceed our own, if we, born and educated in a country of freedom, intitled to its blessings, and knowing their value, pusillanimously[3] deserting the post assigned to us by Divine Providence, surrender succeeding generations to a condition of wretchedness, from which no human efforts, in all probability, will be sufficient to extricate them; the experience of all states mournfully demonstrating to us, that when arbitrary power has been established over them, even the wisest and bravest nations, that ever flourished, have, in a few years, degenerated into abject and wretched vassals."[4]

It is time to be very, very clear about our Nation’s democracy in a Republic.  Here is the correct “Connections” which intertwine Both Founding Documents:
The Declaration of Independence is the Premise of God and Man stated in the entire document: directly 5 times for God; and indirectly – the entire paragraphs which delineate the evil to good mankind taking action upon other “persons defined as homo sapiens”, with each composed of a body and a soul.

4 of the 5 are addressed completely in Hillsdale’s Constitution 101: Equal Station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature God entitle them; unalienable rights; Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions; [the Everlasting] And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the Protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.

The 5th is a little buried: “We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here.” and includes “consanguinity” or “ancestors”— The Puritans 150 years previous.

The Constitution is the application, in law, of the Perfections required in Honor, to prevent government-over-man, which every individual founder with most of the Colonists, knew absolutely would, again, occur.

This first eight Amendments to the Constitution are directly the laws for Person-over-government protections of the inalienable rights. Unalienable rights are also referred to as Natural Rights from John Locke’s Treatise. Life, Liberty and pursuit of Happiness are Individual, constitutional “Person’s - body and soul” innate rights from God. Therefore this Constitutional Principle does not entail “precedent” in courts of law: “The natural rights of persons are inalienable, preceding the social contract and the constitution, and persons may not be deprived of them even with their consent, since they do not have the power to surrender those rights, and therefore do not have the power to delegate the depravation of those rights to others.”

Reference to God’s Laws occurs as the responsibility of governance with liberty to ourselves and our posterity – ordained for The United States of America.

Specifically, in relation to the Belief and  Perfection of God in the revelation of His will to an individual who is obligated to obey His commands, and whose ‘soul’ is accountable in a state of reward or punishment: The Constitution addresses “Person” accountability in solely two locations: “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”—Article II:1(8); and “..shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, .. ..The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution..—Article VI.”

The above represents the years 1620 Mayflower compact through 1947 when the first assault to remove “Religion and Morality” from America occurred.  What follows is the “change” to Socialist-Secular Law which started, with Obama’s invasion of private property - Chrysler Corp., the plateau of Anti-law, making the Open-society-UN/ borderless nations and jurisprudence / Agenda 21 - Human Habitation - Socialist-Secular overthrow of the Republican form of government.  Secular Law’s hallmark is absence of Person’s “Religion and Morality” / “Oath of Office”.

Somewhere in the 70's, our legislative, government-over-men wrote laws which declared that all Persons shall submit their living body excrement - urine - to be cleared of the evil “drug abuse” and that the excrement could be demanded unannounced. Over the years, the excrement graduated to ‘if you want to work here, submit to excrement – or don’t bother to apply’; and by the way, we are going to check your work history out also.  December 2009  added:  “Section 6201:Nationwide Program for National and State Background Checks on Direct Patient Access Employees of Long-Term Facilities and Providers” within “Patient Protection and Affordable Act” - Obama Socialism - makes fingers a Federal Offense to say “No” by Constitutional Person; 9,100,000 x $51.00 x 50 States (which lose their sovereignty to the socialist czar-Executive Department of Government.      [Except the “section” ends with President to be elected Romney with our Vice President in the Senate - Ryan with our new Majority in the Senate – and continued majority in the House----pending the “consent of the American Republican form of government / Oath of Office / First Governed”!]

Then, the living object, fingerprints, with criminal record histories, which cannot be released to the requesting, Appointed ‘Department of Law’ - unless the Name and Specific Criminal Code - are delineated, became required for, in California 26 professions or 9,100,000 Persons @ $51.00/head payable to the DOJ.

The living object fingers, went much further than the living object excrement-urine, for you cannot enter a profession, continue working in a profession; or retroactively, over more than 19 years, and 38 days after Obama took office, for some of the professions. The fingers include:  if you refuse, you shall discontinue your professional work; but “it is not intended to be punitive, because it is a “right of the state in the interest of public safety and protection” - for all citizens except those “Professionals” who dared to study, passed exams and have been practicing with complete honor and integrity – as safe and givers of care and protection to those, of the other, government-defined group: consumer - public - “vulnerable class of citizen”.

Government-over-man’s definition of equality and justice by secular, designated group of “body physiology”, absent “Soul” of “Religion and Morality”- 1620 to 1947.

While “NO” boxes are available for both urine and fingers, they don’t mean “NO”; for if you decide not to submit, forget even having your application considered;...or continuing your professions; or as the census bureau, employment application stated: ‘It is against Federal Law to require you to answer these questions, but you must should you want your application considered.’

The” intended, “non”-punitive punishment” is removal of the profession / life’s work when an individual refuses to submit; or dares to say “NO” with the reasons: - it is against my person of honor to use drugs; or  there isn’t a criminal record history to search for; and therefore, no “honorable-reason” for the state to pursue fingerprints.

Now, with California’s Socialist-Secular Regime of AntiLaw, the Second Amendment right to have arms on your person, for whatever reason, is NULL and VOID. The ‘state’ has declared all persons with guns are “suspicion-less” and a “threat” to public safety.  Again, the state of secular, government-over-man law refuses to acknowledge the contents of either Founding Document..and demands subservience and submission, to its force, power and control.  Guns don’t function unless attached to a homo sapiens — not counting the government-over-man servants of equity and justice defined by government-over-man.

Guns are an inanimate object named “Tool” which cannot function unless Person ‘turns it on / pull its lever / has the bullets which result from pulling the lever.  The ‘socialist state’ declares all persons capable of handling this tool which must be controlled by its government-over-man you are accused – no other option is available for the Socialist-UN borderless nations and jurisprudence  mantra “safety and protection” of people, public, consumer. – except professionals are not members of these groups while pursuing the life-choice.  One appointed board member submitted the opinion “When they get sick, then they are members of the public or consumers.”.

Government-over-man courts, legislatures, and appointed-Departments declares that there is no right of life, as profession or trade, for choosing “No” to the above accusations with coercion.  The Supreme Court declares “profession is not a natural right”.  – It even denies that the Acts of urine, fingers, guns absent human hands, are accusations at all! Here is the meaning of accusation: “1. The act of charging with a crime or offense; the act of accusing of any wrong or injustice.
These Secular-Anti-Religion and Morality of the Founders Acts against unalienable rights by the government-over-man state Federal and several of the States, repudiate:
“ 5. To attempt to name all of these rights--starting with "Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" mentioned in the Declaration of Independence--would be to start an endless list which would add up to the whole of Man's Freedom (Freedom from Government-over-Man). They would add up to the entirety of Individual Liberty (Liberty against Government-over-Man). Innumerable rights of The Individual are embraced in the Ninth Amendment, which states: "The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." (Here "Constitution" includes the amendments.) Some idea of how vast the list would be is indicated by just one general freedom which leads into almost all of Free Man's activities of daily living throughout life: freedom of choice. This term stands for the right to do--and equally not to do--this or that, as conscience, whim or judgement, taste or desire, of The Individual may prompt from moment to moment, day by day, for as long as life lasts; but always, of course, with due regard for the equal rights of others and for the just laws expressive of the above-mentioned "just powers" of government designed to help safeguard the equal rights of all Individuals. Spelled out in detail, this single freedom--freedom of choice--is almost all-embracing.”[ibid 1]

Further, and much more important, complete rejection of any protection for “Person” as Individual with “Soul” who determines each-one-person’s “free agency” as obedient, love of serving God and as Morality: “The quality of an action which renders it good; the conformity of an act to the divine law, or to the principles of rectitude. This conformity implies that the act must be performed by a free agent, and from a motive of obedience to the divine will. This is the strict theological and scriptural sense of morality. But we often apply the word to actions which accord with justice and human laws, without reference to the motives form which they proceed.”.

What needs to be said about all herein contained, including Part I, is that government-over-man at the State and Federal levels, are declaring that Constitutional Person, with each-one’s-unique Soul before God and before our Republican form of government - Oath of Office and Pledge of Allegiance - “Religion and Morality”, are null and void from January 20, 2009, because it Is court Enforced as “2009-2012Rule of Law”. That in reality, no universal truth exists; and that Person of soul is incapable of honor, integrity, knowledge and wisdom; and that solely, Open Society-Socialist-Secular law is the only possible source of its self-defined, use of the words: equity and justice.

This ‘opinion-position-actions of state’ has been adjudicated in one, relatively small, United States District Court as a “Pro Forma”; Constitution v. Civil; absent attorney, In forma Pauperis Complaint; and all the above statements are proven true by the Plaintive’s Argument for the Declaration’s natural rights in Honor; in 1620-1879-1947(60's) Rule of Law as violations of the I,  IV, V, IX, XIV Amendments verses the two Defendants A and B with the Attorney Generals (3) of the State of California defending secular-living object fingers as prints:

There were three Amendments to the Plaintive-written, Complaint: “Eleventh Amendment: Injunctive Relief”:
Defendants used the following partial-list of Socialist-Secular 2009-2012 “rule of law, group and living object, precedent cases, utilized throughout their responses:
---Lupert v. California State Bar 761 F.2d 1325, 1328 (9th circuit 1985) - “is well-established that the right to pursue one’s chosen profession is not a fundamental right”;
—American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada v. Mast, 670 F.3d 1046, 1052-1053 (9th circuit 2012) [which is a case occurring after any consideration in the Plaintive’s complaint] - “court must decide if impose a criminal punishment or intent is nonpunitive regulatory scheme”.
—United States v. Lujan, 504F.3d 1003, 1006 (9th circuit 2007) - A law is an unconstitutional bill of attainder if it legislatively determines guilt and inflicts punishment upon an identifiable individual without provision of the protections of a judicial trial.”
— Skinner v Railway, Labor Executive ‘Ass’s, 489 U.S. 602, 627 (1989) - “well established that an individual who participates in a closely regulated industry or activity has a diminished expectation of privacy because they participate in a pervasively regulated industry and thus, may be required to submit to suspicion-less drug testing.  Three other precedent cases attend this “secular - group-designated / absent equal protection under the law — state defense.
Skinner also worked to “balance the state’s interest against the plaintiff’s expectation of privacy and the intrusiveness of the “search” and important “governmental interest” was furthered by the [excrement urine].
—The state also has “access to information necessary to determine whether the applicant for a nursing license has been convinced of any offense”, Accusation,.substantially related to the qualifications, functions and duties of a registered nurse from B&P Code.
—Hayes v. Florida (1985) addressed intrusiveness as defined and opinionated by the court for its own interest.

All of the key words in each of the above “precedent” cases are excellent examples of George Orwell’s “1984" Black-White meaning the court with attorneys that “punitive” isn’t punitive; accusation isn’t “conviction”, “criminality of ALL”,  “suspicion-less”; and punishment inflicted was not applied because “closely regulated industry” by state is superior to Person’s practice and demonstrated “sacred honor”. Neither Plaintive, nor Defense substantially changed their arguments: Plaintive “unreasonable seizure” “accusation with application of criminal punishment for no crime whatsoever” of Natural Rights; repudiation of Person as One Protected from government-over-man - secular, Socialist law v. complete repudiation and abstinence of any idea of the contents of Both Founding Documents, of “religion and Morality”, or of the duty-service-and honor absent from both Defendants and the Attorney Generals evidenced by the writing of the case [5]. At no time was the Defendant’s-Attorney case to include any reference to the Founding Documents – though the case is about Life, Liberty and pursuit. Solely, Secular Law - Body Part and Regulation absent the above Amendments - Honor - duty - service or integrity of One Person.

Plaintive argued that: In 1789 fingers, living object, would not have been heard in a court of law and therefore invasive doesn’t apply.  “Equity, its other name - justice -, are not required.”

Punitive - punishment means “Any pain or suffering inflicted on a person for a crime or offense, by the authority to which the offender is subject, either by the constitution of God or of civil society.”.  The only true parts of this definition are the words “suffering” and “inflicted” because the authority as an official agent of state - instituted removal of life and liberty for absolutely No Crime or Offense ... since fingers are not capable of taking action - as prints and attached to person become “privacy”; and 38 years of demonstrated safe, clinical practice of the Art and Science of Nursing far outweigh - any definition by that official agent of wrong-doing of any sort – to “require” a search or to determine that the Plaintive’s word of honor is not acceptable to her appointed judgement in regulation.[This definition wasn’t address by Plaintive].

“Suspicion-less” is an inherent misnomer that is almost funny, if it weren’t so socialist against both our Founding Documents and the very essence of our Nation’s American Soul of God, Nation, Duty, Honor and Service most of non-government-over-man - Americans.

“..Unreasonable seizure means no warrant - justification or probable cause to remove Plaintive’s sole source of income”;.. 38 years of demonstrated, safe and competent practice of profession without either fingers or criminal record checks required. ..”

“The most important and deciding reason the ‘unreasonable seizure’ is the complete absence by Defendant A’s Personal, Sworn “Oath of Office” violated in supporting and enforcing this unconstitutional regulation with the Force of Law combined with the presumption of innocence (accusation) ignored; while Plaintive has performed to the letter of the regulation’s requirements which is also combined with “The Florence Nightingale Pledge” taken at Our Lady, Queen of Angels Catholic Church, Cardinal McIntyre, presiding:
“I solemnly pledge myself before God and presence of this assembly;
To pass my life in purity and to practice my profession faithfully.
I will abstain from whatever is deleterious and mischievous
   and will not take or knowingly administer any harmful drug.
I will do all in my power to maintain and elevate the standard of my profession
   and will hold in confidence all personal matters committed to my keeping
   and family affairs coming to my knowledge in the practice of my calling.
With loyalty will I endeavor to aid the physician in his work,
   and devote myself to the welfare of those committed to my care.”

This Pledge contains every single requirement of the regulation “required” of the state in Plaintive’s chosen Profession; and is full witness to God in complete understanding and practice with accountability to Him.  There were approximately 40 men and women diploma, RN graduates participating in “The Florence Nightingale Pledge” that day..who also represent 38 years of nursing practice according to the Oath - two were Nuns.

The Declaration and Constitution are intertwined and our Republican form of government is “Oath of Office” as “Religion and Morality” – all of which derives from Scripture. Religion means: “Religion, in its most comprehensive sense, includes a belief in the being and perfections of God, in the revelation of his will to man, in man's obligation to obey his commands, in a state of reward and punishment, and in man's accountableness to God; and also true godliness or piety of life, with the practice of all moral duties.”.  In Law before socialist-Secular ‘rule of law’, “Only Person or corporate persons which are composed of individual persons may be subject to legal process”.  An individual was assumed to be righteous and accountable to his/her God or conscience in righteousness – that’s why the innocent before proven guilty exists only here in America and no-where else on God’s Planet.

That is also the reason “Oath of Office” occurs in only two locations: Article II and Article VI. Many Americans - especially of the government-over-man group think-force and control - do not realize that because our Article IV:4 is a guarantee of the Republican form of government; “elected We the People, and any office holder appointed”, may be the Right-Hand in the air - speaker; but is stating the Oath as if each-one-American is in the room.

The Oath is not limited to “body”. The Oath is one person’s soul, made before God - who is the Supreme Lawgiver. Those who do not have a supreme Lawgiver Oath as Affirmation means Morality.

Majority means the Philosophy “The Majority must be strictly limited in power, and in the operation of government, for the protection of The Individual’s God-given, unalienable rights proclaimed in the Declaration..and, therefore, of the rights of The Minority—of all minorities....
No majority, however great even all of the people but one Individual—may properly infringe, or possess the power to infringe, the rights of any minority, however small—even a minority of a lone Individual.”[1] Majority is also force: There is no maxim ...which is more liable to be misapplied, and....needs elucidation than the current [1786 - 2009-12] one that the interest of the majority is the political standard of right and wrong...”—Madison.

Plaintive was raised, made a conscious decision to act on behalf of both Founding Documents and in the name of God; for, since long before 1990, Plaintive had been among the recipients of God’s unalienable right to life, liberty and pursuit of Happiness, in honor and integrity all areas of her life’s “free agency”. While challenging, difficult, to say the least, the learning in adversity with the support, presence, love and comfort of Jesus and The Holy Ghost are as absolute in confirming every promise He makes; as is Socialist-Secular Law in denying His existence, or Any Individual’s innate honor - duty - service, our Nation is Rooted firmly in practice and in belief.  Smile at the beauty that creates the continuum of life’s “free Agency” – God on the Right with Lucifer on the Left, For Each Sovereign Person-One-at-a-Time Protected unalienable rights to continue “Freedom of choice” ---- even the Defendants, Attorney Generals, and Judge - no person is left out and each soul is known to our Creator.

“The reversal from rights of person originating in our 1620 Society; to government defined, designated: social groups’ of inclusion and exclusion; inanimate objects, living objects; allows statutes, regulations, Executive Orders, court rulings, virtually unlimited avenues to write law from plastic bags; to “top-two vote getters regardless of political party affiliations”; to allow “fish” as party to an action at law over the life, liberty, and pursuit of agriculture of tens of thousand persons; or Defendant A to consider her jurisdiction includes a role in: “Potential License Denial or Suspension for Failure to Pay Taxes (AB14244, Perea, Chapter 455), Statutes of 2011".

The state’s ability to write, enforce and adjudicate law and regulation, or regulation as law, without any accountability with Oath of Office / Religion and Morality of government serving People – not the other way around.

For Defendant B - refusal in the face of Amendment I grievance, to acknowledge, if not have the State-pay – for the unemployment insurance which had nothing to do with a previous employer or with Plaintive’s reason for leaving the professional  position.  The State removed the License — the State should pay the unemployment insurance. [Sorry taxpayers; but that’s the other reason state Must be “strictly limited in power, and in the operation of government” — even ridding ourselves of Obama – finding his Black-widow cocoon’s and web of legacy — means ridding of the power of Anti-Law.]

When a law is wrong, it stays wrong.  The wrong grows upon itself which is what the opening paragraphs of this essay address...and the major reason, all of US(A) are in the adversity which this Anti-Law-Secular-Anti Religion and Morality, results; – because the generations involved are mid to late 40's and younger, public school indoctrinated, who only learned to correct the indoctrination through military service and/or just being the natural rights/Religion and Morality individual the vast majority of US(A) are just in pursuing life, liberty and happiness.

The unemployment insurance was refused because of the grievance against Defendant A.  The Defendants had to be the Heads of their respective appointed quasi-legislative Department’s because of the definition and modern implementation of the Eleventh Amendment. ----“modern”.  In 1789 or 1785, the integrity of person giving their “word of honor” as Oath of Office to perform their responsibilities and duties of office was an assumption when the 11th was written.  John Adams is famous for:
“We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry, would break the strongest cords of our Constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”

There is only one reason for the fingerprints – obtaining a criminal history record because DOJ files convicted persons by fingerprint whorls - Not by name. An Accusation has occurred since arrest with charge of crime has occurred for the fingers of the accused professional to be printed at all. Plaintive has never been arrested – has never even been in a police headquarters at any time in 38 years of professional work.  Excrement of urine wasn’t involved at all in the Plaintive’s case.

There is a lot more to Plaintive’s case...the techniques of investigative reporting common to Yellow-journalism; the famous “double-think” of never let facts get in the way of preconceived conclusions (the guns in the hands of people state of socialist California  v. 2nd Amendment right to formation of militia in our Nation’s history; the fishies v. people of life, liberty and general welfare as a leading “Nation” within the States in the field of food to the Planet, etc.); the need to investigate the “criminality”(accusation) of ALL REGISTERED NURSES due to the preconceived conclusions of wrong-doing. Protection and safety of consumers cannot be an issue if there is no act!  Secular Law seeks to enforce before the wrong or offense has occurred, or even been thought of by constitutional person, and then sets out to prove it is righteous when all it really becomes is power-force-control-of person’s life and liberty — no “Religion or Morality” required any more than wrong.  Person of Wrong isn’t even part of the witch-hunt!

“Black-white” is a socialist tactic of  lie. It is an “iniquity against that which is good”. It is  actually are very characteristic and identifiable to the Anti-Law of Open Society-UN borderless nations and jurisprudence-2009-2012-Socialist-Secular rule of law, which is supreme to the 1879 Article VI rule of law; and with “Double-think” added to “crimestop” - diverting attention by the socialists in power from criminal deeds by anyone in a position of power (Reid’s support of Holder against our Nation’s laws; Feinstein /Obama’s betrayal of Israel’s plans for Iran; Obama’s citizenship and direct lawlessness Chrysler corp, solar, petroleum to Venezuela - no ocean drilling of our nation’s asset; the incredible debt to be paid by generations - his children and their children’s children).

The “fingers” remained dominant over 2009-2012 Socialist-Secular Rule of Law over 1620-1789-1947Rule of Law-Article VI.  Fingers are much more important than an individual which in fact of actions – is the working of the Socialist-Secular group-think-government-over-man: there is no more Declaration especially related to Natural unalienable rights, consent of the governed, equal station entitled by person to Nature and nature’s God – there is no God; and therefore no Constitution to have an “Oath of Office” or “Religion and morality to for obedience to God’s Laws to occur. And last but certainly not least — only the state of force and power – is able to determine the right and wrong / good or bad of people.  This Anti-Mankind-think dominates and supports international chaos absent “Religion and Morality”; - in $$$$$$$; - in the removal of the blindfold of independence of courts and the removal of the balance of justice and truth for the Lady of Law on front of the Supreme Court... and the removal of the 10 Commandments for public places including teaching posterity.  Posterity includes those who do not recognize the accusation with the removal of natural rights because the state says it makes for “safety and protection” of people and “Oh well, sometimes we have to give up a little liberty.[!!}”; and the Defendants - Attorney Generals of this Complaint.

We the People of Both Founding Documents continue to read them as written and given out in the millions of little pocket editions.  But Socialism’s worldly power-control-Secular asserts the right to be free from religious rule and teachings and imposition of religion upon the government’s duties and litigation. Secular declares itself neutral on matters of belief; but from all herein — secular is anything, But Neutral;.. And it perpetrates its “preconceived conclusions” - “black-white” - “crimestop” upon the majority of its court, legislative, substructure-Department-bureau-board-agent-official-closed shop-union- precedents upon each-one-constitutional person.  Those who support this anti-law do seek to overthrow the Article IV Republican form of government and replace it with the above.... unless “We the People” speak and act — not only with our “consent of the governed vote”; but also becoming involved in all school boards, legislative events, political parties - with their factions and establishment changes, and in teaching all Posterity as one person - the beauty and magnificence of “Religion and Morality” intertwined with individual Oath of Office intertwined with Scripture - Honor - integrity —intertwined with The Laws of both Declaration and Constitution — intertwined with God’s Laws.


Resources and Notes Continued:
1. “The Just Heritage of Posterity Always Uppermost in The Founders' Minds” in “1776 American Ideals; Hamilton A. Long; 1976; www.lexrex.com

2. infamy: “Total loss of reputation; public disgrace. Avoid the crimes and vices which expose men to infamy.    2. Qualities which are detested and despised; qualities notoriously bad and scandalous; as the infamy of an action.    3. In law, that loss of character or public disgrace which a convict incurs, and by which a person is rendered incapable of being a witness or juror.” ;  iniquity “  1. Injustice; unrighteousness; a deviation from rectitude; as the iniquity of war; the iniquity of the slave trade.
2. Want of rectitude in principle; as a malicious prosecution originating in the iniquity of the author.
3. A particular deviation from rectitude; a sin or crime; wickedness; any act of injustice.  Your iniquities have separated between you and your God. Is.59.  4. Original want of holiness or depravity.  I was shapen in iniquity. Ps.51";   cruelty :” 1. Inhumanity; a savage or barbarous disposition or temper, which is gratified in giving unnecessary pain or distress to others; barbarity; applied to persons; as the cruelty of savages; the cruelty and envy of the people.  2. Barbarous deed; any act of a human being which inflicts unnecessary pain; any act intended to torment, vex or afflict, or which actually torments or afflicts, without necessity; wrong; injustice; oppression.  With force and with cruelty have ye ruled them. Ezekiel 34.

3. Pusillanimous: “1. Destitute of that strength and firmness of mind which constitute courage, bravery and fortitude; being of weak courage; mean spirited; cowardly; applied to persons; as a pusillanimous prince.  2. Proceeding from weakness of mind or want of courage; feeble; as pusillanimous counsels.

4. Ibid 1; “..1774 in "Resolutions of Committee for the Province of Pennsylvania" which constituted "Instructions from the Committee to the Representatives in Assembly" of Pennsylvania as drafted by John Dickinson, a signer of the Constitution and distinguished in other respects as a leader in the period 1774-1787.

5. 11-CV-1760 MMA (POR); “No clear statement of ‘claim for relief” is available.