Part I of II parts: Last night this writer was informed....

..That electing Romney and Ryan as President was more important than the Truth in God with Colonial men words and work in creating and implementing Both Founding Documents.  

Though, doubted and not well understood by many legislative, judicial, union departments of group-think and too many ‘Americans of forget the Founding’, Both Founding Documents were not involved in the separation of church and state which evolved from the, now terrible, misread of Mr. Jefferson’s Letter to the Danville Baptist Church which stated quite plainly in all but the last sentence or two, the importance of One Person accountable to God with obedience to His Laws, The “Religion and Morality” in Mr. Washington’s “Farewell Address”, all 56 men, and Noah Webster in “The American Dictionary of the English Language 1828".

While attending Bible Study, the other “never let facts get in the way of preconceived historical conclusions, occurred: “Washington had lots of horses shot-out from under him.” as a response to the semi-blasphemy which states Washington could not be a prophet.  It is true that Washington had lots of horses shot-out from under him; including at the French and Indian War where Gen. Braddock received mortal wounds, and were it not for Colonel Washington’s

“..I called to my young men and said, Mark yon tall and daring warrior? He is not of the red-coat tribe—he hath an Indian’s wisdom, and his warriors fight as we do—himself alone is exposed. Quick, let your aim be certain, and he dies. Our rifles were leveled, rifles which but for him knew not how to miss —‘twas all in vain; a power mightier far than we shielded him from harm. He cannot die in battle.

I am old, and soon shall be gathered to the great council fire of my fathers in the land of shades; but ere I go there is something bids me speak in the voice of prophecy.  Listen!
The Great spirit protects that man, and guides his destinies—he will become the chief of nations, and a people yet unborn will hail him as the founder of a mighty empire!  (Eyewitness Dr. James Craik) an Indian Trader “conducting a party which consisted of a grand sachem...chief was a very great man among the northwestern tribes, and the same who had commanded the Indians on the fall of Braddock....15 years afterwards.” 1

The reverence for separation of church and state is absent two obvious facts which interfere with the “preconceived conclusion” of the Supreme Court comprised of men as homo sapiens Person’s body, absent soul: 1) You cannot remove Scripture from the word “Church”; and 2) in point-of-fact-secular law, there is a “state religion”. It goes by the name of IRS 501C3 which instructs that in order to be state-judged as “..or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..”, a church shall not make opinion on the political position or practice of another homo sapiens with essential cognitive attributes; not any Bill, Act, or Issue which belongs to the ‘state’.  ‘State religion’ defines and judges the privilege and permission of the “Nature’s God” in the ethics and practice of the church – body of person is well able to be separated from soul of the person, or corporate persons which are composed of person.  Body, secular or temporal man’s law is superior and therefore has the right to declare the ability of any church to exist, for without the donations – church cannot exist or perform the duties, responsibilities, and service of its existence.
And now our Republic is confronted, for the first time in its history, by a few, body absent soul and God, “Religion and Morality”, or “any unsound doctrine” homo sapiens with essential cognitive attributes which state that: mankind is incapable of competing unless the state defines and allows certain practices of government-over-men: the infamous “Open Society-UN borderless nations and jurisprudence/Agenda 21 determined, “opinion without interference”, life-liberty and future of air, land, water, minerals, foodstuffs, behaviors, and all inanimate and living objects, Socialist-SECULAR RULE of LAW.

The Obama-2009-2012-Socialist-Secular-Rule of Law is now, reign of enforced, Anti-law, with the “change”, to Overthrow the Article IV Republican Form of government with VI supreme Law of the Land as written 1789.  Court decisions abound in adjudicating this anti-“Religion and Molarity”Law.  The overthrow continues as initiated by Everson v. New York Board of Education in 1947, – though the Supreme Court doesn’t like to go back that far since history in court of Precedents3 over natural rights, common law, or respect for One Person in brotherhood of the lessons of God’s Laws, continue...

We the People are well-able, as were each and every-one of the Colonists from1620 forward — with the Indians (think Tecumseh:- The George Washington of ALL Indian Tribes in the East and Plains extending nearly to the Rockies at his height of influence), – intuitively know this is not a true or accurate statement of “Spiritual is Supreme”:
“The fundamental principle underlying the traditional American philosophy is that the Spiritual is supreme--that Man is of Divine origin and his spiritual, or religious, nature is of supreme value and importance compared with things material.

2. This governmental philosophy is, therefore, essentially religious in nature. It is uniquely American; no other people in all history have ever made this principle the basis of their governmental philosophy. The spiritual brotherhood of men under the common fatherhood of God is a concept which is basic to this American philosophy. It expresses the spiritual relationship of God to Man and, in the light thereof, of Man to Man. To forget these truths is a most heinous offense against the spirit of traditional America because the greatest sin is the lost consciousness of sin.

The fundamentally religious basis of this philosophy is the foundation of its moral code, which contemplates The Individual's moral duty as being created by God's Law: the Natural Law. The Individual's duty requires obedience to this Higher Law; while knowledge of this duty comes from conscience, which the religious-minded and morally-aware Individual feels duty-bound to heed. This philosophy asserts that there are moral absolutes: truths, such as those mentioned above, which are binding upon all Individuals at all times under all circumstances. This indicates some of the spiritual and moral values which are inherent in its concept of Individual Liberty-Responsibility.2".

Because of the ‘focused’, blind, stiff-necked, deaf, opinion without interference of “anyone but Obama”, the legacy of repudiation of the Founding Father’s words and work, is removed as irrelevant to any actions resulting from the Open Society-UN borderless nations and jurisprudence/ Agenda 214 which has resulted in “Rule of Law” – “Oath of Office” – Person of Accountability and Responsibility to Both God’s “Religion and Morality” in combination, intertwined within each: Scripture-Declaration-Constitution-each Individual’s “free agency with consequences thereof’; or the arrogance and conceit of “We the People” cannot comprehend more than just one idea at a time - so just argue get rid of Obama; and ignore the repudi8ation of both Founding Documents with The Republic.

Problem is that, especially here in Socialist-communist-government-over-and ignoring-of ‘consent of the governed’, or the Laws of the Declaration: “An unconstitutional statute is not a law, no matter how vigorously it may be enforced. Enforcement does not make what is enforced the law. What is enforced is a REGIME. In a constitutional republic, the law and the regime should coincide. If they do not, the regime is not law but ANTI-LAW.5 ; the Anti-law Is the ‘Rule of Law’ and because it Is Secular, there can never be truth in justice; for those concepts require knowledge and wisdom from God or from righteousness of philosophy ante-dating God.  To undermine “We the People” as not capable is an unwitting insult; for once learned, the Laws of Declaration and Constitution rooted in Scripture or even most Philosophy; is the basis of mankind on God’s Planet.

One Person’s soul is what all “the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them,.... life, liberty, pursuit of happiness,...we have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here; consanguinity, recognition of despotism and tyranny - usurpation, and “we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor..”, is about. There is Nothing on this earth, of more value, than what God has given each-one Person, in our Eternal Soul....

End Part I:

Part II: is the This Day, in our Nation’s history, evidence, enumeration, and application of One Person as a member, alone or with others, for “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States,.”.  This is the ‘Relate’ and ‘Reflection’ of each one American as ‘The Whole of the polity is the Sum of Each One of its parts” of our Republican form of government....Each One of US(A) owns his/her ‘grain of sand on God’s Universe of beach’ and He does hold US accountable.. As many, including this Person does in the sacred nature of conscience.

 Polity is another important word...perhaps you, reader will look it up and visit Noah...he will teach you a lot...

Resources and notes:
1. “The Real George Washington, The True Story of America’s Most Indispensable Man”; “He Cannot die in Battle”; Jay A. Perry, Andrew M. Allison, W. Cleon Skousen (who also authored a casette series on both Declaration and Constitution, circa 1980's);  pp.48-50; National Center for Constitutional Studies; www.nccs.net.

2. “The Twelve Basic American Principles”; “1. Spirit is Supreme” as in Article VI “supreme Law of the Land”; Hamilton A. Long; “American Ideals 1776"; www.lexrex.com

3. Legal Definition of Precedent is important:
“As a practical matter, courts can usually find precedent for any direction they want to go in deciding a particular case. Accordingly, precedent is used as often to justify a particular outcome in a case as it is to guide the decision.The body of judicial decisions in which were formulated the points of law arising in any case. A previously decided case that is considered binding in the court where it was issued and in all lower courts in the same jurisdiction.A court decision in an earlier case with facts and law similar to a dispute currently before a court. Precedent will ordinarily govern the decision of a later similar case, unless a party can show that it was wrongly decided or that it differed in some significant way.

The decision of courts of justice when exactly in point with a case before the court are generally held to have a binding authority, as well to keep the scale of justice even and steady because the law in that case has been solemnly declared and determined.

To render precedents valid they must be founded in reason and justice; must have been made upon argument, and be the solemn decision of the court; and in order to give them binding effect there must be a current of decisions.

According to Lord Talbot, it is "much better to stick to the known general rules than to follow any one particular precedent which may be founded on reason unknown to us." Blackstone says, that a former decision is in general to be followed unless "manifestly absurd or unjust," and, in the latter case, it is declared when overruled not that the former sentence was bad law, but that it was not law.

Precedents can only be useful when they show that the case has been decided upon a certain principle and ought not to be binding when contrary to such principle. If a precedent is to be followed because it is a precedent, even when decided against an established rule of law, there can be no possible correction of abuses because the fact of their existence renders them above the law. It is always safe to rely upon principles.

"In Law, a previous decision, rule or practice which, in the absence of a definite statute, has whatever force and authority a Judge may choose to give it, thereby greatly simplifying his task of doing as he pleases. As there are precedents for everything, he has only to ignore those that make against his interest and accentuate those in the line of his desire. Invention of the precedent elevates the trial-at-law from the low estate of a fortuitous ordeal to the noble attitude of a dirigible arbitrament." -- Ambrose Bierce”  http://www.lectlaw.com/def2/p069.htm
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
4. Here is the “Table of Contents” for Agenda 21.  Please notice the all-encompassing government-over-all member nations decree, control, and power — ALL Secular / using common phraseology and words of Scripture and world documents of rights; but absent any meaning according to American History of the Founding documents.:
Table of Contents

Chapter Paragraphs
1. Preamble 1.1 - 1.6

SECTION I. SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC DIMENSIONS
Chapter Paragraphs
2. International cooperation to accelerate sustainable development
                in developing countries and related domestic policies 2.1 - 2.43
3. Combating poverty 3.1 - 3.12
4. Changing consumption patterns 4.1 - 4.27
5. Demographic dynamics and sustainability 5.1 - 5.66
6 Protecting and promoting human health conditions 6.1 - 6.46
7. Promoting sustainable human settlement development 7.1 - 7.80
8. Integrating environment and development in decision-making 8.1 - 8.54

SECTION II. CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCES FOR DEVELOPMENT
Chapter Paragraphs
9. Protection of the atmosphere 9.1 - 9.35
10. Integrated approach to the planning and management of land resources 10.1 - 10.18
11. Combating deforestation 11.1 - 11.40
12. Managing fragile ecosystems: combating desertification and drought 12.1 - 12.63
13. Managing fragile ecosystems: sustainable mountain development 13.1 - 13.24
14. Promoting sustainable agriculture and rural development 14.1 - 14.104
15. Conservation of biological diversity 15.1 - 15.11
16. Environmentally sound management of biotechnology 16.1 - 16.46
17. Protection of the oceans, all kinds of seas, including enclosed and semi-enclosed seas, and coastal areas and the protection, rational use and development of their living resources 17.1 - 17.136
18. Protection of the quality and supply of freshwater resources: application of integrated approaches to the development, management and use of water resources 18.1 - 18.90
19. Environmentally sound management of toxic chemicals, including prevention of illegal international traffic in toxic and dangerous products 19.1 - 19.76
20. Environmentally Sound Management of Hazardous Wastes, Including Prevention of Illegal International Traffic in Hazardous Wastes 20.1 - 20.46
21. Environmentally sound management of solid wastes and sewage-related issues 21.1 - 21.49
22. Safe and environmentally sound management of radioactive wastes 22.1 - 22.9

SECTION III. STRENGTHENING THE ROLE OF MAJOR GROUPS
23. Preamble 23.1 - 23.4
24. Global action for women towards sustainable and equitable development 24.1 - 24.12
25. Children and youth in sustainable development 25.1 - 25.17
26. Recognizing and strengthening the role of indigenous people and their communities 26.1 - 26.9
27. Strengthening the role of non-governmental organizations: partners
              for sustainable development      27.1 -  27.13
28. Local authorities' initiatives in support of Agenda 21 28.1 - 28.7
29. Strengthening the role of workers and their trade unions 29.1 - 29.14
30. Strengthening the role of business and industry 30.1 - 30.30
31. Scientific and technological community 31.1 - 31.12
32. Strengthening the role of farmers 32.1 - 32.14

SECTION IV. MEANS OF IMPLEMENTATION
33. Financial resources and mechanisms 33.1 - 33.21
34. Transfer of environmentally sound technology, cooperation and capacity-building 34.1 - 34.29
35. Science for sustainable development 35.1 - 35.25
36. Promoting education, public awareness and training 36.1 - 36.27
37. National mechanisms and international cooperation for capacity-building in developing countries 37.1 - 37.13
38. International institutional arrangements 38.1 - 38.45
39. International legal instruments and mechanisms 39.1 - 39.10
40. Information for decision-making 40.1 - 40.30 “                               (  http://www.un.org/esa/dsd/agenda21/res_agenda21_00.shtml )                  

5           .“DECLARATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLES”; Jon Roland; www.constitution.org;  menu “rights, Powers, Duties”: This document does exactly what Jon intended it to accomplish: “Whereas, during the course of history usurpers have attempted to misconstrue certain principles of constitutional republican government for their own ends, and that the original language of the Constitution for the United States did not anticipate all the ways it might be misinterpreted, we hereby set forth some of those principles with greater clarity, using more modern language.” [This writer must add: using Noah’s 1828 Dictionary, readily fills-in many gaps of the definition of words for the unique Republican government. Just following the train of nouns, verbs, adjectives contained in any one word, leads to an inherent understanding and relate/reflect of our Founding Father’s with their wonderful knowledge, wisdom and Truth in God and in History — www.1828-dictionary.com ]