Breitbart.tv » Obama in 2009: If Economy isn’t Fixed in 3 Years There Will be a 1 Term Proposition

Breitbart.tv » Obama in 2009: If Economy isn’t Fixed in 3 Years There Will be a 1 Term Proposition

COMMENT:

hat's the best he can do!? Well, it isn't going "to be fixed", because this President has no idea of the definition of "fix" he is using; or the First Principle of responsibility to use 'taxpayer's money' aka, 'government programs', money with respect for 'We the People" who earn, or those "individuals seeking their own life, liberty, and happiness, who won't be able to spend into the economy-at-large due to the force-dictate demands of Both State and Federal levels of government to create-continue-irresponsible 2600 Departments making 1000 regulations 100% sans any part of "The Supreme Law of the Land", or any other law for that matter, to every One [1] Congressional Law passed; or 'government programs', aka "taxpayer dollars" mis-spent in the mis-be-gotten-quest-to-end-suffering-poor-; and 'competition between mankind [from zeitgeist movie on you-tube]'' ; which has been present on this globe since Adam and Eve got together to "eat the apple" God left in place. Or even consider the cost to taxpayers to have committees meet for the purpose of continuing to talk about PREDETERMINED DECISIONS, against the NATURAL RIGHTS of more than 250,000 people living in the Delta of California and having the audacity to use water against fish for unproven, environmental's definition of scientific-political-motivated for exploitation of facts, supported by political justice defined by man ----not by God's Laws AND BY NO STRETCH OF THE IMAGINATION, the Basis of the Supreme Law of the Land. So, you see, this man isn't capable of even grasping the enormity of the problem he with his friend Soros and others created, perpetrated; and now must figure out how to get excused from responsibility!!! The only saving for these 'fools among mankind as 2009 to date Federal government', is the part of "We the People" who still think that because they are having their 'picnic in the park, this Sunday' that their life, liberty, and happiness - is not at risk, because 'You can't see the Law in the Declaration of Independence [How do you see The Law, written in The Bible?] or how the Constitution works to protect "We the People" from Government because only "Attorneys and Judges" can read it.

Breitbart.tv » Alaskans React to Palin Email Release

Breitbart.tv » Alaskans React to Palin Email Release

comment:

o ConsLibertarian: Precisely! So is the Weinbart fiasco-DISTRACTION, probably continuing under another person or persons unknown; and have you noticed: it's gender related, you don't hear of problems caused by the other sex. For you Dems, and believers of attacks on America's Law of the Land; sovereignty of person, state, nation: distraction is still from Saul Lucifer Alinsky's ethics of means: The most unethical of all means is the non-use of any means... The standards of judgment must be rooted in the whys and wherefores of life as it is lived, the world as it is, not our wished-for fantasy of the world as it should be (that's the distorted view of religion or universal truth S. Lucifer Alinsky is referring to)...." pp.25-26

"The third rule of ethics of means and ends is that in war the end justifies almost any means...." p.29

"The seventh rule... is that generally success or failure is a mighty determinant of ethics...." p.34

"The tenth rule... is you do what you can with what you have and clothe it with moral garments.... It involves sifting the multiple factors which combine in creating the circumstances at any given time... Who, and how many will support the action?... If weapons are needed, then are appropriate d weapons available? Availability of means determines whether you will be underground or above ground; whether you will move quickly or slowly..." p.36

[http://www.crossroad.to/Quotes/communism/alinsky.htm]".

Obama-Soros-cohorts requires: Anything to avoid confrontation of Constitutional Principle: "An unconstitutional statute is not a law, no matter how vigorously it may be enforced. Enforcement does not make what is enforced the law. What is enforced is a REGIME. In a constitutional republic, the law and the regime should coincide. If they do not, the regime is not law but ANTI-LAW."

Our Founders, in absenteeism, say: "..The history of the present [Obama-Soros Administration...

with Congressional cohorts] is a history of repeated injuries* and usurpations*, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny* over [not only] the States; [but also, the #1 Constitution Principle: "person*" as the attacked recipient of so-called benevolent government of this Administration]. To Prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world. ..".

BUT, in order to have the firmness, discipline, integrity, principle, completely clear from 1776, 1789, or any period between 1620 - America's beginning as 13 Colonies with independent, but loosely cooperative, laws; and government to the addition of "United States" of America in 1776; with rocky-unsteady, continuing even to this date - except for the reason for these words.....It Is Imperative That Noah Webster's "1828 Dictionary of the English Language" be used for all asterisk words.  These asterisk words are copy & pasted from www.1828.mshaffer.com. Sources can also be found from the "400th Anniversary of the King James Version of The Bible" - revised and published: "American Patriot's Bible" which "Tear down that wall"...that impregnable wall of the 1947 Supreme Court Ruling "Everson v. Board of Education [1947]" against God in Court; but where Satan has since, retained regular attendance.

1) The Supreme Court, in "Lance Corporal Matthew Snyder v. The licensed, Baptist Minister":  The corporal's Father, practicing his "..or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;.." was found guilty of his religious exercise; while the license* of the Baptist Minister 'was, not OK, but tolerated speech-demonstration since a lot of the time the minister was silent, because "just an expression of public concern..", ..against the #1 Natural Right; fought and died for- since before 1620 of  sovereignty of religious practice by all mankind - one person at a time directly with God or with His Son.

8/9 Justices, because the license of action by the Baptist Minister "expressing a public concern" was a clear-cut freedom of the #2 Natural (prohibiting) or abridging the freedom* of Speech [though both #1 & #2 with #3 are all contained in Amendment I].  It is 8/9 Justices who are guilty against the father of Corporal Snyder; made worse because they refused to address "religion", so did the attorney for the father, and when you listen to the 'audio' [which can be downloaded at the Supreme Court site]; you will witness at least 20 min. worth of where signs are located, angle of vision, loudness of bullhorn, with why did it disturb Plaintiff, plus various and sundry other 'Pharisee-style law' which is absent 'Spirit of Jesus' for teaching man the lessons of God's Laws in living....THE SUPREME LAW OF THE UNIVERSE from which ALL Laws derive; and not even solely, through "Blackstone's "Commentaries on the Laws of England".

8/9, and maybe even the 9th Justice for different reasons, did not even give notice to violations by a "licensed" minister from any State, who violates: 3 of 10 Commandments given to Abraham Directly from God; and repeated by Jesus.  Since this action by the Baptist Minister is a repeated violation against other persons...his 'freedom of speech' is trumped by his violation of the Supreme Lawgiver the minister purports to speak for!  That is the logic tree that should have been followed; but due to ignorance, and perhaps denial, of the connection between applying God's Laws with the protections of "person" in our Nation's Constitution. As it stands, Mr. Snyder needs financial assistance to a pay off attorney and other costs to the heresy and violations by the license-taken by the minister (www.matthewsnyder.org).

The 8/9 Justices own and owe, via their integrity of person, apology for their ignorance and action taken against Mr. Snyder; and to their personal belief's in a Supreme Lawgiver.

2)  "Nunes and his allies are seeking to achieve several major changes to the management of California’s water infrastructure. Their plan includes the restoration of a bipartisan agreement known as the Bay-Delta Accord. It also revamps the San Joaquin River restoration, replacing it with an economically responsible and environmentally feasible fishery— saving taxpayers a billion dollars. .."  AND,  "..Once lawmakers had completed their opening remarks, testimony was received from local water districts, as well as state and federal representatives. Obama and Brown Administration officials opposed the bill, maintaining their view that the Delta pumps were damaging the ecosystem, impacting a number of species including the smelt, salmon and killer whale. Administration officials also touted the importance of current policies, which they described as balanced, to protect the Delta ecosystem."   AND, ".. Upton explained that farmers were being subject to a slow death due to water diversions and that broken promises related to the San Joaquin river deal convinced him to seek changes. [Congressman Devin Nunes Blog: "Senate Democrats Declare Water War"; 6/8/11; www.nunes.house.gov]".


BUT, and this is the Founder's hate of Democracy and total distrust of government of any kind:
A) The government stopping a natural resource of water to any agriculturally area of any part of a state or this nation...is violently and destructively, in opposition and in violation of Both Declaration and Constitution:
DECLARATION:
----"...that ALL men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that AMONG THESE are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness. ..Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from THE CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED,..";
----"..[Federal and State governments] have combined with others to subject US to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving [their] Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation. .." ;
----"..For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world."  California is, or was, in the top 10 Nations of the world in agriculture both in QUALITY and QUANTITY, still unsurpassed by any other Nation!
----"..depriving US {Californians who own, live, work, and supply, harvest, plant, support infrastructure of agriculture throughout the states and world), in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury [seizing water also seized, without due process or appeal, the ownership of life, liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness];
----"..establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into [this State of California];
----"..ravaged our [agriculture and husbandry], ..[closed our towns and businesses], and destroyed the lives of [families, owners,  and employees - every walk of California Life];
----"In every stage of these Oppressions We [California Representatives at both State and Federal Levels, private citizens, and commissions] have petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated have been answered only by repeated [continued] injury. ..".
CONSTITUTION:  BE BACK...HAVE MEETING MORE TO COME....

Breitbart.tv » Creepy Eric Boehlert Assures Al Sharpton: Media Matters Will Continue Monitoring Fox News Despite Beck’s Absence

Breitbart.tv » Creepy Eric Boehlert Assures Al Sharpton: Media Matters Will Continue Monitoring Fox News Despite Beck’s Absence

Fox you were attempting to be the 'last bulwark' for the Truth of not just Glenn Beck [person], but the group which includes some of the only remaining 'historians' for the Truth of our founding: WallBoard, Glenn's extensive research department - which included college students; all the interviews of all the fine men and women throughout the world today; and renewing all that "..One Nation Under God.." represents.

Fox never forget: "The Way, The Truth, and The Light" is from God, through men like Glenn and so many others; who shall not tolerate "Zeitgeist" group-mind-thinking at the sacrifice of the sovereignty of "person" from not only our Declaration and Constitution, but also, The Lord God and His Son's sanctity of knowing EACH ONE PERSON-ONE AT A TIME: of each you at Fox; with all of Obama-Soros-Lucifer Alinsky Czars and the "I'll take you out of business!. You non-conforming "doers of information with great distaste to our definitions".

inside 'Zeitgeist" [Fox Producers, managers, directors, VP's and various other mislead doers of conforming 'Newspeak'; perhaps you would go to youtube and view the Soros-+13men-Obama-Lucifer Alinsky-Mayer-Piven-3hour movie about the problems of the world which only these members of group-mind-homo sapiens---unless you are the 'leader' or supreme Mammon of Satan.....Please Look for yourself; because that is what you have compromised in your Decision to stop Glenn Beck and all he represents at Fox.

The Truth is God and Jesus' Lessons which are every, single, large-medium-small events on this Globe--one Nation, one State, one village, one person, at this time in history.

To Fox and To the above individual with his belief in 'Zeitgeist', to the czars - both visible and invisible (oops, does that mean there is unseen law!?) - most important to Mr. Soros, Mr. Obama, and every cohort around all of you------God is waiting<<<<<<

all Nations under the duress of Satan as demagogues-dictators;

any person standing any location on this planet.

CONGRTULATIONS FOXNEWS --- YOU ARE OUT OF BUSINESS....AT LEAST THE BUSINESS OF TRUTH WITH INFORMATION!!!!!

Jon Roland - Constitution Society presents...

himself as a candidate for AG in Texas 2010:  http://youtu.be/nyFcXA616RQ

AND ...  as "The Legal Historian", this writer discovered about 3 years ago; and hve been using the Society's website:  www.constitution.org  - since:
http://youtu.be/aBiPh_CZnZ8

05.23.2011, An American Patriot's update of...As long as judges can ignore....

As long as judges can ignore the Principles expressed in the Declaration of Independence, 'We the People - elected and un-elected' must provide this missing fact of Law of God....which is the basis of the law courts of homo sapiens are suppose to be judging.  

That is because of the following misconception prevailing throughout our nation:  'Maybe Both founding documents were meant to be read and studied...even used as a guide to lawmaking with the art of governing....from Age of understanding right and wrong through death; "The Constitution is Law. The Declaration of Independence is not!"; along with the 'unwritten, but equally distorting myth': only attorney's and judges can handle The Constitution...sans Declaration...also sans any idea of principles 'declared'.  Because "You can't see the law in the Declaration". 

 All 3 branches of government deny or refuse to believe that God and Jesus Did and Does in Fact exercise 'the Way, Truth, and Light' of:  "among the powers of the earth, separate and equal station, Laws of Nature and of Nature's God, hold these truths to be self-evident, all men created equal, endowed by their Creator; and most important of all, from Mayflower to this day and the future: "with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we [every sovereign person, citizen or not] mutually pledge TO EACH OTHER our Lives [how many in how many parts of the globe or right here on our soil?],  our Fortunes [every, sovereign individual who served this nation from the Mayflower..and forever("A Nation, if we can keep it.}], and  our sacred Honor [each sovereign person who has stood for "Religion and Virtue" - [against all odds or not -]. This is what "..to respect its Flag.." means. 

The Supreme Court could find for "freedom of speech"  by using law by man; rather than Law from God. Here is the First Principle of the Constitution:  "The individual component of the polity is the person, which is defined as any being consisting of or having the essential cognitive attributes of a member of the species homo sapiens, including both the capacity to compete with others for the means to exercise the natural rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and the capacity to regulate its competitive actions to avoid depriving others of those rights..."*. 


The minister, licensed by members of homo sapiens, misrepresenting his  church license refused..declaring on their signs statements,  as vocal an insult his religion and disobedience to at least 3 of God's Commandments, demonstrated shouting the words through a megaphone and writing blasphemies on signs.  Here is the absent consideration of the second part: "..and the capacity to regulate its competitive actions to avoid depriving others of those rights..".  The "Freedom of Religion for the Father of Lance Corporal Matthew Spaulding was disregarded as not important to the case of freedom of speech,...only the second parenthetical expression of the First Amendment.  Thinking about disobedience to God's Law, can you name any one or all three of the Commandments from God through Abraham and from Jesus through Himself as the only pathway to God? These Commandments were the essence of Life, Liberty, and happiness from the Mayflower Compact in 1620, 156 years of Colonial America before either the Declaration or the Constitution. 


8/9 Justices sitting on their Judgment Seats of Homo Sapiens,  enforced a "regime**" of the principle  'Freedom of Speech'. There was no matter of public concern except what the judge 'defined' as public concern to thereby allow that the disobedience to God's Law -- The First Statement in the First Amendment didn't count as important for Mr. Spaulding or the celebration of his son, giving his life fighting for this First Amendment, as a memorial in Jesus Name.  Their concern was the gross misrepresentation of "Nature's God" and of the last, and most lasting, sentence ever written by men anywhere on this Globe:  "..with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our Sacred Honor....that Marine Corporal Lance Snyder gave "his last full measure" ! The eight justices gave their "opinion" in judgement as members of the species 'homo sapiens'; keeping to the high, "impregnable wall of separation" against "religion" so wrongly used in most all Court Cases from the local courts to the Supreme Court.  "The 1828 American Dictionary of the English Language" [thanks beyond words to] Noah Webster, our First Teacher of primary schools in America defined 'Religion' as follows:  "1. Religion, in its most comprehensive sense, includes a belief in the being and perfections of God, in the revelation of his will to man, in man's obligation to obey his commands, in a state of reward and punishment, and in man's accountableness to God; and also true godliness or piety of life, with the practice of all moral duties. It therefore comprehends theology, as a system of doctrines or principles, as well as practical piety; for the practice of moral duties without a belief in a divine lawgiver, and without reference to his will or commands, is not religion.".  There is much more to be found at www.1828.mshaffer.com.  For the record here is Mr. Webster's definition of "Freedom": 1. A state of exemption from the power or control of another; liberty; exemption from slavery, servitude or confinement. Freedom is personal, civil, political, and religious. [See Liberty.]. 2. Particular privileges; franchise; immunity; as the freedom of a city. 5. Any exemption from constraint or control. 8. License; improper familiarity; violation of the rules of decorum; with a plural. Beware of what are called innocent freedoms.


Because #8 directly addresses the license of the minister's "freedom" to speak, here is the 1828 definition of Liberty:    
ivil liberty is an exemption from the arbitrary will of others, which exemption is secured by established laws, which restrain every man from injuring or controlling another. Hence the restraints of law are essential to civil liberty."  The minister is allowed to have his Freedom of Speech without the Responsibility of his 'wrong actions' as "opinion", before God and Man.  Except that every American upset by this 'opinion' of 8/9 Justices, not Judge Alito, knows the judgement is intrinsically wrong...that the justices are locked-into the mind-set of 'No God in Court'; but not the consequence of "Satan is Welcome" in the guise of 'judgement by mankind's' inability to always perform as Jesus taught us. 

That is why just because you cannot see Principle, does not negate Law, especially from the Creator of Law!!!  This is the most egregious miscarriage of American and Constitutional Principles which has ever occurred.  Because it is Jesus and God, who are negated --- in virtually every aspect of this Supreme Court Case Docket #09-751.  


I have it downloaded to my computer - You should also, especially if you want "..the blessings of liberty to ourselves and Our Posterity(your kids and their's too!).  You need to hear the time it takes to speak to the distance, direction, placement of signs, absence or presence of signs,  words, feelings spent away from Principles of Declaration-constitution with God's Laws. And from: "On every question of construction, carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or invented against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed. Thomas Jefferson"; and is the reason Mr. Webster's "1828 American Dictionary is so important, and never should any "Bill" or any Court Decision be made, unless it stands at the elbows of Both Judges and Attorneys,  alongside a good knowledge of the original, 'not versioned or attempt to translate a lifestyle, principled way of living - not present in any "modern" world with the absence of Latin, Greek, Hebrew - '  KJV of The Bible...and "The Book of Mormon" because it started in 1823 and closely parallels US History since principle applied, is represented in ALL Three. 

SNYDER v. PHELPS ET AL. No. 09–751.  Argued October 6, 2010—Decided March 2, 2011
at,   https://www.oyez.org/cases/2010/09-751  :

        In summary: the Court found that the law of tort was being applied against the protesters not in a "content neutral" but rather in a "content based" or "viewpoint based" manner; the protesters were engaged in political speech, they were expressing themselves about a matter of public concern, not merely private matters; the protesters were in a place that is considered part of the "public forum;" and the protesters did not disrupt the funeral"!!!!   So much for "see" the Laws of God via 'homo sapiens'; and their 'whiles of Satan' are also reflected in Mt. Soledad; AZ v. Federal Government of Obama and Holder; and Wisconsin's State Government vs. Union's definition of their 'special rights as members-administrators-attorneys fraudulent use of taxpayer money'! And so much for 30 articles of socialist communist, 1947-1949 'udhr creeds of UNTRUTH #18, 19, "Everyone has a right to their opinion." falsity because 'They also have the responsibility for that "opinion" when [not if] they are Wrong! The responsibility of the opinion is the second part of 'opinion' which flies out the window of ignorance and "avoid 

 Whole, art. iii Supreme Court does not want any reference to God, nor to Principles as Lessons which Jesus taught.  Because only human-kind's written law is allowed [Matt. 7, these men are called Pharisees]. Satan, because he represents the disobedient, sinner, wrongdoer, profane, unjust are the reason for a court;  his whiles, can pretty much distort, misuse, and covet ignorance allowing judges to come to illogical conclusions from want of correct information and from want of God's Law or the last sentence of Amendment VII "and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any court of the United States, than according to the RULES OF COMMON LAW."   That's means 'Sir William Blackstone's " Commentaries on the Laws of England" which gives God's Law Full Measure as the origins of Law because "..Such, among others, are these principles: that we should live honestly, should hurt nobody, and should render to everyone his dues; to which three general precepts Justinian has reduced to whole doctrine of the law...".  There is a lot more in "Excepts from.." located in the appendix of the first edition of "Learn and Teach The Declaration and The U.S Constitution using original texts and the Classical Learning Method of the Founders [Research, Reflect, Relate, Record] by Joseph Andrews at www.teachconstitution.org.  Of course, reading it for it's completeness as Joseph did, is much more important; but at least there is a representation of part of reflection, relating, and recording of the Truth contained in the excerpt.   



It is time, after 391 years [don't discount each of the colony's laws], to reaffirm "assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of nature and of Nature's God entitle them,....  that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among............That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men,  deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed...".  We Must Allow the Promise of the Declaration be part of the Fulfillment of the Promise in the Constitution to prevail over the whiles of mankind, especially of the thrones of Executive/bureaucratic power; legislative who have forgotten or learned about both from the same public school system that forbids or does not obey its own laws to be sure All American History is Taught.... so that  "I believe it is my duty to my country to love it, to support its Constitution [Declaration], to obey its laws, to respect its Flag [in memory of Lance Corporal Laurence Snyder...to Mt. Soledad..and to all of US(A) to have given their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred Honor...because they understood or simply because they inherently have the Trust in the Virtue of those they love.

For all young people old enough to understand You Shall Not continue your life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness for yourselves and your Posterity; until you understand the terrible, dark ages, of Social Justice which is not social or even justice...because God is justice; man is Not Capable unless mankind seeks God, Jesus and the Way, the Truth, and the Light......  God is Magnificent, "King of Glory...King of Kings, and Lord of Lords.."... as well as the Best choice for the unique, sovereign person you are because you were born in the United States of America with Founders who knew human nature and Freedom from God and His Son - Jesus.   

That the art of controlling human nature to keep government within the realm of reason to serve people....we must always be "A wise and frugal government...shall restrain men from injuring one another, shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good government. (Thomas Jefferson, 1st inaugural Address, 3/4/1801 - almost 210 yrs. ago, to the day.)  This is a reflection of one of the Constitutional General Principles:  "The polity, or society, is created by the social contract, in which persons agree to join together for mutual benefit and defense, and to regulate their behavior to avoid forms of competition which are destructive of social coherence and effectiveness, such as violence, deception, or collusion, or to infringe on the rights of others."

"See" the Law - Docket #09-751 is about both of The First Amendment's "no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech.. with God's Laws and "The Declaration of Constitutional Principles" as avoiding "depriving others of those rights", a.k.a. the purpose of Court of Law. 


Justice has not been done in the Case of Lance Corporal Matthew Snyder, his father, or any American paying attention to principles of law which our nation has worked upon since 1620. A member of homo sapiens  -  the minister with his license - does not answer to breaking God's Laws: Thou Shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain; Do not bear false witness against thy neighbor...;  Do unto others as you would have others do unto you.  With this much "disobedience" to God's Laws, the minister gave up his right to protection under #   8. License; improper familiarity; violation of the rules of decorum; with a plural. Beware of what are called innocent freedoms."; with civil liberty is an exemption from the arbitrary will of others, which exemption is secured by established laws, which restrain every man from injuring or controlling another. ..".

http://www.matthewsnyder.org/help.html  is the website for Matthew.  An American asking for justice from "The Rule of Law" Court; been denied that justice, and has the court costs to manage. Please visit and help if you can.

*"Declaration of Constitutional Principles" by Jon Roland available at https://www.constitution.org/consprin.htm  
**regime: "An unconstitutional statute is not a law, no matter how vigorously it may be enforced. Enforcement does not make what is enforced the law. What is enforced is regime. In a constitutional republic, the law and the regime should coincide.  If they do not, the regime is not law but anti-law." 

Submit a Public Comment | Citizens Redistricting Commission

Submit a Public Comment | Citizens Redistricting Commission

5/23/11 there are only 4 of more than 55 Public Input statements published at www.wedrawthelines.ca.gov. This speaker has decided to publish comment re the "priorities" of deciding location of each of the lines within the 58 counties of California. This comment was submitted in pdf form to the Commission:

Public Input Speaker #13 at San Marcos 5/13/2011:

"The world is in serious trouble. The fundamental values of this Nation are being undermined. There is continued crumbling of principle, virtue, integrity and religious values-----the foundation stones of civilization and the definitive ingredients of peace and happiness. (Elder Richard Scott)*"

Along with several citizens of Fallbrook, we became 'real-time' witnesses to the accuracy of this statement at a Wednesday night San Diego County Board of Education Meeting. You won't read the story in any newspaper or hear it on the news, but every word of Elder Scott was at work, against the parents and their children of Fallbrook Schools.**

The statement of Elder Scott and the Witness of the words at the County Board of Education bring relevancy to this Public Input meeting regarding the placement of district lines in relation to "prioritized criteria #1: Draw the districts with equal population, based on the U.S. Constitution": Amendment XIV:2 "Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting whole number of "persons" in each State,..". And in Addition,The Preamble: "We the People of the United States in Order to form a more perfect Union...". These two excerpts from the Constitution combine to reflect one of the Constitutional Principles: "The individual component of the polity is the PERSON, which is defined as any being consisting of or having the essential cognitive attributes of a member of the species HOMO SAPIENS, including BOTH the capacity to compete with others for the means to exercise the NATURAL RIGHTS of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, AND the capacity to regulate its competitive actions to avoid depriving others of those rights and to sacrifice itself for the greater good of the polity as a whole or for their common posterity."***

#2 Priority of our 'Citizens Redistricting Committee is compliance "with the Federal Voting Rights Act to ensure minority voters have an equal opportunity to elect candidates of their choice.". Perhaps, you don't hear the difficulty inherent in the use and definition of these words, but there is difficulty because 1) Our Constitution [or Declaration] doesn't recognize "minority" anymore than it does rich, poor, color, alien-status or any other characteristic of "HOMO SAPIENS"; and 2) "..But in order to apply this to the particular exigencies of each individual, it is still necessary to have recourse to human reason; whose office it is to discover, as was before observed, what the law of nature directs in every circumstance of life; by considering, what method will tend most effectually to our own substantial happiness. And if our reason were always, as in our first ancestor before his transgression, clear and perfect, unruffled by passions, unclouded by prejudice, unimpaired by disease or intemperance, the task would be pleasant and easy; we should need no other guide but this. But every man now finds the contrary in his own experience; that his reason is corrupt, and his understanding full of ignorance and error.(Excerpt from Sir William Blackstone's 'Commentaries of the Laws of England" 1765)".

These Principles are a major reason 'persons' came and come here from all over the world: The recognition of the sovereignty, under God, of the "person". Although, it is the long known and much respected 'Naturalized Citizen' who has often worked the hardest to preserve and protect the Freedoms of Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of happiness - defined by person--never government.

When each 'We the People - Commission member' starts to draw and place that redistricting line anywhere in 58 counties of this State, REMEMBER 'The Priority':   One Man: One Vote is the Supreme Law of the Land - "superior to all other public acts, whether by officials or private citizens. .."***. The Constitution is #1 because the Supreme Law of the Land is #1. That you are protecting and equalizing 1 man:1 vote as consent from "We the People" to the government...not the other way around! Thank you, Catherine West, American and Private Native California

*Richard G. Scott, Quorum of the Twelve; Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter Day Saints; BYU Commencement 5/10/2011.
** See: www.pyrrhicchange.blogspot.com for the 'rest of the story': "The San Diego Board of E..d..u..just got..."

***"Declaration of Constitutional Principles" Jon Roland; www.constitution.org - Section Rights, Powers, and Duties.

WI UNION PROTESTS COST STATE $8 MILLION from Breitbart TV 05.17

The other reason all union contracts are unconstitutional because the costs become indirect taxes on 'We the Peoples's property and effects named earnings without legislative process; because the Constitution does not recognize a group of citizens called 'union -members, administrative through attorney" when it says in Constitutional Principle: " The individual component of the polity is the PERSON, which is defined as any being consisting of or having the essential cognitive attributes of a member of the species HOMO SAPIENS, including Both the capacity to compete with others for the means to exercise the NATURAL RIGHTS of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, AND the capacity to regulate its competitive actions to AVOID DEPRIVING others of those rights and to sacrifice itself for the greater good of the polity as a whole or for their common posterity. ["Declaration of Constitutional Principles" Jon Roland; Constitution Society, www.constitution.org Section 'Rights, Powers, and Duties'] and in the Preamble "We the People". The Constitution does not make reference regarding size, group membership as wealthy, poor, suffering, offspring of illegal parents, or color - culture. 

The other part of the Constitution violated is the 14th Amendment: "....No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States, nor shall any State deprive any person of life ("houses, papers, and effects" of life-choices), liberty (to pursue happiness especially applied to "..are reserved to the ...respectively, or to the people."), or property (earnings as money, business, risk, benefit of life's choices) without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the EQUAL PROTECTION of the laws. AND two other 'Constitutional Principles': "In a constitutional republic, the constitution is the SUPREME LAW, superior to all other PUBLIC acts, whether by OFFICIALS or PRIVATE CITIZENS. ANY statute, regulation, executive order, or court ruling which is INCONSISTENT with that Supreme Law and NOT DERIVED from it IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL and NULL AND VOID FROM INCEPTION." With: 
"An unconstitutional statute is not a law, no matter how vigoously it may be enforced. Enforcement does not make what is enforeced the law. What is enforced is a REGIME. In a constitutional republic, the law and the regime should coincide. If they do not, the REGIME is not law but ANTI-LAW." 

Union Contracts with governments at ANY LEVEL are ANTI-LAW because the contracts are inconsistent with the Constitution as the IX, X, and XIV Amendments. That doesn't even go into the unconstitutional facts that members(person) are forced to used their membership dues for political purposes they do not agree with; have dues 'taxed' from paychecks even while on strike and for new 'workers' who earn less than $40/wk.; or that union's administration coerce the 'elected by union money -We the People', to perform at the union administration's bidding whatever the requirement of force or benefit that "elected-union-we the people" is selected to support via the committee, seniority, or position in 'organisation chart' he/she is positioned upon.

Eric Cantor, Jon Kyl challenge White House on debt - Mike Allen - POLITICO.com

Eric Cantor, Jon Kyl challenge White House on debt - Mike Allen - POLITICO.com

The purpose of Congress establishing a "debt ceiling" is to control the spending of the "random, killer shark, mentality of an Administration that dislikes business, disrespects the Constitution of the United States, continues to spend this nation's assets as taxpayer resources without regard to the "unseen effects" because "only government can define and solve a problem" as exemplified in: the now 'Repealed' (should our socialist President 'Allow' its repeal over the Supreme Law) - Patient Protection and Affordable Act; the "America's Financial Stability Act passed as Public Law 11-203" with [Republican assistance]; the Stimulus' of whichever number you care to identify. This while the President's czars work very hard, out of the light of legislative process, to write regulations which are consistently, "inconsistent with that supreme law and not derived from it..."exemplified by: 'Food, Cosmetic, drug act update'; internet "filtering"; mandates for unionization of private business; regulation of private trade and college schools - beyond what existing college and trade schools perform without the government.

Raise the 'debt ceiling' because this will avoid "..the question [of] the credit worthiness of the U.S. government and trigger an economic crisis..". Wonder where this Administration has been vacationing in its 'group-minded, only government can solve problems' mentality? Aren't we currently in a financial crisis; most of US(A) unemployed would say Yes; business would say 'yes' because it cannot continue to function the the government-controlled environment defined by the so-called 'stability' of 2 leading socialist's from Obama's class-thinking, external government. We cannot be anymore bankrupt than "We the People" are now! Our credit worthiness will NOT IMPROVE by raising the debt ceiling.

This ADMINISTRATION has not on wit of knowledge regarding cutting its own killer-shark attitude towards the "person and person-corporate taxpayers". There is Virtually No Method to guarantee that the Obama Administration can even identify its own contributions to the 14 Trillion and growing debt. His administration is incapable of cutting any of the 1300 Departments and Agencies which Must be cut in order to reduce government in its invasiveness far beyond the limits of "enumerated powers".

The Obama Administration is incapable of behaving responsibly in cutting any part of government; and therefore, giving them more money to spend - irresponsibly - is the height of the ridiculous. It shall lead to what is a tragedy for our posterity to live with 14Trillion in Debt... to a Catastrophe of what remains as the free market of capitalism. Raising the 'debt ceiling' could result in the further demise, status post government definition and control of financial risk-benefit of which it ignorant, but will find someone to write a software program to fix what-ever is deemed to need fixing, by the new-cost-adding commission of "financial stability' . Raising the 'Debt Ceiling' or raising the money to support more bankruptcy is a violation of Article I:8:4 uniform laws of bankruptcy. The existing 'debt ceiling' Is The Law.

Do not continue to insult "We the People" by feeding the "Obama-Socialist, Killer shark" AGAIN

Trading disobedience to the constitutions for political gain...

via Democratic Assemblymen: Fuentes, Cedillo's "it makes economic or moral sense to deny scholorships to bright illegal [aliens] (aka Dem's "immigrants"). These 'illegal aliens under legal age' who went through CA's tax-payer public education expense; and with these two Assemblymen with cohorts + Governor, now will continue via "free tax payer money as Cal-Grants" on top of the tax-payer supported college education!  Of course, this little - no economic or moral consequence "Dream Act" - doesn't consider the number of natural or naturalized immigrants Citizens who, also, cannot easily obtain a college education and are from the same nation as the illegal aliens.  Nor does the Assemblymen Fuentes, Cedillo and cohorts, respect their constituents, speaking of taxpayers as though they are non-entity, money-bags which Democratic Assemblyman do not have any morality to support...

NO ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES:  What is our bankruptcy cost now [not debt...Bankruptcy]?  How many businesses are we losing each month?   All that 'elected We the People' absence of knowledge regarding the definition of "economic and moral sense"; combined with the absence of supporting  Both US and State constitutions - or the morality of "Rule of Law' is irrelevant to Fuentes and Cedillo's personal Oath of Office.

But, there is still a "Rule of Law" in this Nation...and one of its States  as Constitutional Principles violated:
 ---"A citizen is a person who has the civil right to remain within the territory of a state and to return to it if he leaves it, the right to delegate powers to agents (that would be Fuentes - Cedillo - Brown) who comprise any government of that state, and the duty to defend that state.
---A government consists of those persons to whom certain powers held by the citizens in common are delegated, to act as agents for those [above] citizens, exercising only such powers as are delegated to them, and according to their instructions.  That delegation and those instructions constitute an extension of the basic social contract called the Constitution, which may be written or unwritten. 
---The authority of an agent or official exists only for as long and to the extent that he exercises his legitimate powers properly, and hge automatically ceases to be an agent or official if he exceed his authority.
---Defense of the state and the constitution includes defense against threats of all kinds, including invasion or attack, insurrection, criminal acts, natural or manmade disasters [like growing bankruptcy on the backs of taxpayers while rewarding persons receiving "privileges and immunities" of citizens sans citizenship, legal residence, or the responsibilites of citizenship], or public ignorance or apathy."
---THE RULE OF LAW "In a constitutional republic, the constitution is the supreme law, superior to all other public acts, whether by officials or private citizens. Any statute, regulation, executive order, or court ruling which is inconsistnet with that supreme law and not derived from it Is unconsitutional and null and void  from Inception.
---Any act performed by an agent of government which is unconstitutional is illegal, and while performing that act the person ceases to be an agent of government or to have any offricial status, regardless of what the trappings of office or color of law he may project.  It is also almost certainly a deprivation of the civil rights of someone, and therefore also a violation of one or more of the constitutional criminal laws against doing so.
---Statutes passed with the intent that they not be enforced uniformly, but at the discretion of law enforcement agents, are unconstitutional. They violate the Constitutional requirement for equal protection of the laws, and constitute an unconstitutional delegation of legislative authority to executive officials. ["Declaration of Constitutional Principles" by Jon Roland; www.constitution.org]

Here are the US and State Constitution violations the 'Dream Act' imposes:
Article IV:2 "The citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of the Citizens in the several States."   Illegal aliens have no privileges since they take no responsibility toward their duty as citizen of the United States. Illegal alien's children, until adulthood in CA Law, are under their care. The continued inadequate money for their education in college does not change just because of time spent without responsibility or answering to law of the United States or California - It is Not a Use of Taxpayer Money. Especially when cuts have to be made to the acute and chronically ill, elderly, and disabled who have been legal citizens of this state and nation. There is no reward of citizenship simply because of living under parents who are illegal. Privileges of benefits provided by taxpayers to other taxpayers including citizens unable; are not available; especially at the expense of other citizen's children growing-up legally under 'The Rule of Law'.  "---An unconstitutional statute is not a law, no matter how vigorously it may be enforced. Enforcement does not make what is enforced the law. What is enforced is a regime. In a constitutional republic, the law and the regime should coincide. If they do not, the regime is not law, but anti-law."  Illegals are just that...even spending years in the US as illegals!

CA Constitution Article I:7(b)  (b) A citizen or class of citizens may not be granted privileges or immunities not granted on the same terms to all citizens.

Privileges or immunities granted by the Legislature may be altered or revoked. AND

Article I:7(a)corresponds to Amendment XIV:1 of the US Constitution: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. .."  Illegal persons are not citizens. To be "Granted" the gift of citizenship via the privilege of taxpayer dollars; when other of the same Nation south of the border, can not and shall not be allowed is not equal protection. 

N. Webster's, "The American Dictionary of the English Language", defines privilege: "1. A particular and peculiar benefit or advantage enjoyed by a person, company or society, beyond the common advantages of other citizens. A privilege may be a particular right granted by law or held by custom, or it may be an exemption from some burden to which others are subject. 2. Any peculiar benefit or advantage, right or immunity, not common to others of the human race. Thus we speak of national privileges, and civil and political privileges, which we enjoy above other nations. We have ecclesiastical and religious privileges secured to us by our constitutions of government.  ..". Illegals as parents or children, for whatever period of time here in America, do not qualify as citizens with Privileges.  Immunities is defined as:  "1. Freedom or exemption from obligation. ..  2. Exemption from any charge, duty, office, tax or imposition; a particular privilege;..".  Illegals are not exempt from obligation, from their lawful duty as present under unlawful circumstances..they are not responsible.  Those we call 'elected- We the People" are obligated not to tax or use taxpayer's resources, to support the unlawful activities of parents and their children.  

Please note, no-one is telling illegals, any nation, to leave. Just to understand the risk - benefit of their person and their family's loss of a Citizen's "privileges and immunities".  Many Illegals have and will continue to stay here in America without any 'privileges and immunities' because they Shall Always have their "..nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property...or equal protection.."...even when they do not appreciate or understand that is why they can walk, pretty-much freely about their business. Not to say they won't be punished..as they should be.  The punishment of 'caught-you', is to respect the persons who have arrived, with just as much hardship, as any illegal; but obeyed US Law.  

Integrity of Law applies to each person, one at a time; it is from God's Law which does recognize individual, personal responsibility to God, self, family, city, state, and nation...here and in Mexico or whatever nation is involved. It is the Integrity of Law which the "Dream Act" violates.