NO ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES: What is our bankruptcy cost now [not debt...Bankruptcy]? How many businesses are we losing each month? All that 'elected We the People' absence of knowledge regarding the definition of "economic and moral sense"; combined with the absence of supporting Both US and State constitutions - or the morality of "Rule of Law' is irrelevant to Fuentes and Cedillo's personal Oath of Office.
But, there is still a "Rule of Law" in this Nation...and one of its States as Constitutional Principles violated:
---"A citizen is a person who has the civil right to remain within the territory of a state and to return to it if he leaves it, the right to delegate powers to agents (that would be Fuentes - Cedillo - Brown) who comprise any government of that state, and the duty to defend that state.
---A government consists of those persons to whom certain powers held by the citizens in common are delegated, to act as agents for those [above] citizens, exercising only such powers as are delegated to them, and according to their instructions. That delegation and those instructions constitute an extension of the basic social contract called the Constitution, which may be written or unwritten.
---The authority of an agent or official exists only for as long and to the extent that he exercises his legitimate powers properly, and hge automatically ceases to be an agent or official if he exceed his authority.
---Defense of the state and the constitution includes defense against threats of all kinds, including invasion or attack, insurrection, criminal acts, natural or manmade disasters [like growing bankruptcy on the backs of taxpayers while rewarding persons receiving "privileges and immunities" of citizens sans citizenship, legal residence, or the responsibilites of citizenship], or public ignorance or apathy."
---THE RULE OF LAW "In a constitutional republic, the constitution is the supreme law, superior to all other public acts, whether by officials or private citizens. Any statute, regulation, executive order, or court ruling which is inconsistnet with that supreme law and not derived from it Is unconsitutional and null and void from Inception.
---Any act performed by an agent of government which is unconstitutional is illegal, and while performing that act the person ceases to be an agent of government or to have any offricial status, regardless of what the trappings of office or color of law he may project. It is also almost certainly a deprivation of the civil rights of someone, and therefore also a violation of one or more of the constitutional criminal laws against doing so.
---Statutes passed with the intent that they not be enforced uniformly, but at the discretion of law enforcement agents, are unconstitutional. They violate the Constitutional requirement for equal protection of the laws, and constitute an unconstitutional delegation of legislative authority to executive officials. ["Declaration of Constitutional Principles" by Jon Roland; www.constitution.org]
Here are the US and State Constitution violations the 'Dream Act' imposes:
Article IV:2 "The citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of the Citizens in the several States." Illegal aliens have no privileges since they take no responsibility toward their duty as citizen of the United States. Illegal alien's children, until adulthood in CA Law, are under their care. The continued inadequate money for their education in college does not change just because of time spent without responsibility or answering to law of the United States or California - It is Not a Use of Taxpayer Money. Especially when cuts have to be made to the acute and chronically ill, elderly, and disabled who have been legal citizens of this state and nation. There is no reward of citizenship simply because of living under parents who are illegal. Privileges of benefits provided by taxpayers to other taxpayers including citizens unable; are not available; especially at the expense of other citizen's children growing-up legally under 'The Rule of Law'. "---An unconstitutional statute is not a law, no matter how vigorously it may be enforced. Enforcement does not make what is enforced the law. What is enforced is a regime. In a constitutional republic, the law and the regime should coincide. If they do not, the regime is not law, but anti-law." Illegals are just that...even spending years in the US as illegals!
CA Constitution Article I:7(b) (b) A citizen or class of citizens may not be granted privileges or immunities not granted on the same terms to all citizens.
Privileges or immunities granted by the Legislature may be altered or revoked. AND
Article I:7(a)corresponds to Amendment XIV:1 of the US Constitution: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. .." Illegal persons are not citizens. To be "Granted" the gift of citizenship via the privilege of taxpayer dollars; when other of the same Nation south of the border, can not and shall not be allowed is not equal protection.
N. Webster's, "The American Dictionary of the English Language", defines privilege: "1. A particular and peculiar benefit or advantage enjoyed by a person, company or society, beyond the common advantages of other citizens. A privilege may be a particular right granted by law or held by custom, or it may be an exemption from some burden to which others are subject. 2. Any peculiar benefit or advantage, right or immunity, not common to others of the human race. Thus we speak of national privileges, and civil and political privileges, which we enjoy above other nations. We have ecclesiastical and religious privileges secured to us by our constitutions of government. ..". Illegals as parents or children, for whatever period of time here in America, do not qualify as citizens with Privileges. Immunities is defined as: "1. Freedom or exemption from obligation. .. 2. Exemption from any charge, duty, office, tax or imposition; a particular privilege;..". Illegals are not exempt from obligation, from their lawful duty as present under unlawful circumstances..they are not responsible. Those we call 'elected- We the People" are obligated not to tax or use taxpayer's resources, to support the unlawful activities of parents and their children.
Please note, no-one is telling illegals, any nation, to leave. Just to understand the risk - benefit of their person and their family's loss of a Citizen's "privileges and immunities". Many Illegals have and will continue to stay here in America without any 'privileges and immunities' because they Shall Always have their "..nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property...or equal protection.."...even when they do not appreciate or understand that is why they can walk, pretty-much freely about their business. Not to say they won't be punished..as they should be. The punishment of 'caught-you', is to respect the persons who have arrived, with just as much hardship, as any illegal; but obeyed US Law.
Integrity of Law applies to each person, one at a time; it is from God's Law which does recognize individual, personal responsibility to God, self, family, city, state, and nation...here and in Mexico or whatever nation is involved. It is the Integrity of Law which the "Dream Act" violates.
No comments:
Post a Comment