The other reason all union contracts are unconstitutional because the costs become indirect taxes on 'We the Peoples's property and effects named earnings without legislative process; because the Constitution does not recognize a group of citizens called 'union -members, administrative through attorney" when it says in Constitutional Principle: " The individual component of the polity is the PERSON, which is defined as any being consisting of or having the essential cognitive attributes of a member of the species HOMO SAPIENS, including Both the capacity to compete with others for the means to exercise the NATURAL RIGHTS of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, AND the capacity to regulate its competitive actions to AVOID DEPRIVING others of those rights and to sacrifice itself for the greater good of the polity as a whole or for their common posterity. ["Declaration of Constitutional Principles" Jon Roland; Constitution Society, www.constitution.org Section 'Rights, Powers, and Duties'] and in the Preamble "We the People". The Constitution does not make reference regarding size, group membership as wealthy, poor, suffering, offspring of illegal parents, or color - culture.
The other part of the Constitution violated is the 14th Amendment: "....No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States, nor shall any State deprive any person of life ("houses, papers, and effects" of life-choices), liberty (to pursue happiness especially applied to "..are reserved to the ...respectively, or to the people."), or property (earnings as money, business, risk, benefit of life's choices) without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the EQUAL PROTECTION of the laws. AND two other 'Constitutional Principles': "In a constitutional republic, the constitution is the SUPREME LAW, superior to all other PUBLIC acts, whether by OFFICIALS or PRIVATE CITIZENS. ANY statute, regulation, executive order, or court ruling which is INCONSISTENT with that Supreme Law and NOT DERIVED from it IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL and NULL AND VOID FROM INCEPTION." With:
"An unconstitutional statute is not a law, no matter how vigoously it may be enforced. Enforcement does not make what is enforeced the law. What is enforced is a REGIME. In a constitutional republic, the law and the regime should coincide. If they do not, the REGIME is not law but ANTI-LAW."
Union Contracts with governments at ANY LEVEL are ANTI-LAW because the contracts are inconsistent with the Constitution as the IX, X, and XIV Amendments. That doesn't even go into the unconstitutional facts that members(person) are forced to used their membership dues for political purposes they do not agree with; have dues 'taxed' from paychecks even while on strike and for new 'workers' who earn less than $40/wk.; or that union's administration coerce the 'elected by union money -We the People', to perform at the union administration's bidding whatever the requirement of force or benefit that "elected-union-we the people" is selected to support via the committee, seniority, or position in 'organisation chart' he/she is positioned upon.
The other part of the Constitution violated is the 14th Amendment: "....No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States, nor shall any State deprive any person of life ("houses, papers, and effects" of life-choices), liberty (to pursue happiness especially applied to "..are reserved to the ...respectively, or to the people."), or property (earnings as money, business, risk, benefit of life's choices) without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the EQUAL PROTECTION of the laws. AND two other 'Constitutional Principles': "In a constitutional republic, the constitution is the SUPREME LAW, superior to all other PUBLIC acts, whether by OFFICIALS or PRIVATE CITIZENS. ANY statute, regulation, executive order, or court ruling which is INCONSISTENT with that Supreme Law and NOT DERIVED from it IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL and NULL AND VOID FROM INCEPTION." With:
"An unconstitutional statute is not a law, no matter how vigoously it may be enforced. Enforcement does not make what is enforeced the law. What is enforced is a REGIME. In a constitutional republic, the law and the regime should coincide. If they do not, the REGIME is not law but ANTI-LAW."
Union Contracts with governments at ANY LEVEL are ANTI-LAW because the contracts are inconsistent with the Constitution as the IX, X, and XIV Amendments. That doesn't even go into the unconstitutional facts that members(person) are forced to used their membership dues for political purposes they do not agree with; have dues 'taxed' from paychecks even while on strike and for new 'workers' who earn less than $40/wk.; or that union's administration coerce the 'elected by union money -We the People', to perform at the union administration's bidding whatever the requirement of force or benefit that "elected-union-we the people" is selected to support via the committee, seniority, or position in 'organisation chart' he/she is positioned upon.
No comments:
Post a Comment