05.23.2011, An American Patriot's update of...As long as judges can ignore....

As long as judges can ignore the Principles expressed in the Declaration of Independence, 'We the People - elected and un-elected' must provide this missing fact of Law of God....which is the basis of the law courts of homo sapiens are suppose to be judging.  

That is because of the following misconception prevailing throughout our nation:  'Maybe Both founding documents were meant to be read and studied...even used as a guide to lawmaking with the art of governing....from Age of understanding right and wrong through death; "The Constitution is Law. The Declaration of Independence is not!"; along with the 'unwritten, but equally distorting myth': only attorney's and judges can handle The Constitution...sans Declaration...also sans any idea of principles 'declared'.  Because "You can't see the law in the Declaration". 

 All 3 branches of government deny or refuse to believe that God and Jesus Did and Does in Fact exercise 'the Way, Truth, and Light' of:  "among the powers of the earth, separate and equal station, Laws of Nature and of Nature's God, hold these truths to be self-evident, all men created equal, endowed by their Creator; and most important of all, from Mayflower to this day and the future: "with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we [every sovereign person, citizen or not] mutually pledge TO EACH OTHER our Lives [how many in how many parts of the globe or right here on our soil?],  our Fortunes [every, sovereign individual who served this nation from the Mayflower..and forever("A Nation, if we can keep it.}], and  our sacred Honor [each sovereign person who has stood for "Religion and Virtue" - [against all odds or not -]. This is what "..to respect its Flag.." means. 

The Supreme Court could find for "freedom of speech"  by using law by man; rather than Law from God. Here is the First Principle of the Constitution:  "The individual component of the polity is the person, which is defined as any being consisting of or having the essential cognitive attributes of a member of the species homo sapiens, including both the capacity to compete with others for the means to exercise the natural rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and the capacity to regulate its competitive actions to avoid depriving others of those rights..."*. 


The minister, licensed by members of homo sapiens, misrepresenting his  church license refused..declaring on their signs statements,  as vocal an insult his religion and disobedience to at least 3 of God's Commandments, demonstrated shouting the words through a megaphone and writing blasphemies on signs.  Here is the absent consideration of the second part: "..and the capacity to regulate its competitive actions to avoid depriving others of those rights..".  The "Freedom of Religion for the Father of Lance Corporal Matthew Spaulding was disregarded as not important to the case of freedom of speech,...only the second parenthetical expression of the First Amendment.  Thinking about disobedience to God's Law, can you name any one or all three of the Commandments from God through Abraham and from Jesus through Himself as the only pathway to God? These Commandments were the essence of Life, Liberty, and happiness from the Mayflower Compact in 1620, 156 years of Colonial America before either the Declaration or the Constitution. 


8/9 Justices sitting on their Judgment Seats of Homo Sapiens,  enforced a "regime**" of the principle  'Freedom of Speech'. There was no matter of public concern except what the judge 'defined' as public concern to thereby allow that the disobedience to God's Law -- The First Statement in the First Amendment didn't count as important for Mr. Spaulding or the celebration of his son, giving his life fighting for this First Amendment, as a memorial in Jesus Name.  Their concern was the gross misrepresentation of "Nature's God" and of the last, and most lasting, sentence ever written by men anywhere on this Globe:  "..with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our Sacred Honor....that Marine Corporal Lance Snyder gave "his last full measure" ! The eight justices gave their "opinion" in judgement as members of the species 'homo sapiens'; keeping to the high, "impregnable wall of separation" against "religion" so wrongly used in most all Court Cases from the local courts to the Supreme Court.  "The 1828 American Dictionary of the English Language" [thanks beyond words to] Noah Webster, our First Teacher of primary schools in America defined 'Religion' as follows:  "1. Religion, in its most comprehensive sense, includes a belief in the being and perfections of God, in the revelation of his will to man, in man's obligation to obey his commands, in a state of reward and punishment, and in man's accountableness to God; and also true godliness or piety of life, with the practice of all moral duties. It therefore comprehends theology, as a system of doctrines or principles, as well as practical piety; for the practice of moral duties without a belief in a divine lawgiver, and without reference to his will or commands, is not religion.".  There is much more to be found at www.1828.mshaffer.com.  For the record here is Mr. Webster's definition of "Freedom": 1. A state of exemption from the power or control of another; liberty; exemption from slavery, servitude or confinement. Freedom is personal, civil, political, and religious. [See Liberty.]. 2. Particular privileges; franchise; immunity; as the freedom of a city. 5. Any exemption from constraint or control. 8. License; improper familiarity; violation of the rules of decorum; with a plural. Beware of what are called innocent freedoms.


Because #8 directly addresses the license of the minister's "freedom" to speak, here is the 1828 definition of Liberty:    
ivil liberty is an exemption from the arbitrary will of others, which exemption is secured by established laws, which restrain every man from injuring or controlling another. Hence the restraints of law are essential to civil liberty."  The minister is allowed to have his Freedom of Speech without the Responsibility of his 'wrong actions' as "opinion", before God and Man.  Except that every American upset by this 'opinion' of 8/9 Justices, not Judge Alito, knows the judgement is intrinsically wrong...that the justices are locked-into the mind-set of 'No God in Court'; but not the consequence of "Satan is Welcome" in the guise of 'judgement by mankind's' inability to always perform as Jesus taught us. 

That is why just because you cannot see Principle, does not negate Law, especially from the Creator of Law!!!  This is the most egregious miscarriage of American and Constitutional Principles which has ever occurred.  Because it is Jesus and God, who are negated --- in virtually every aspect of this Supreme Court Case Docket #09-751.  


I have it downloaded to my computer - You should also, especially if you want "..the blessings of liberty to ourselves and Our Posterity(your kids and their's too!).  You need to hear the time it takes to speak to the distance, direction, placement of signs, absence or presence of signs,  words, feelings spent away from Principles of Declaration-constitution with God's Laws. And from: "On every question of construction, carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or invented against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed. Thomas Jefferson"; and is the reason Mr. Webster's "1828 American Dictionary is so important, and never should any "Bill" or any Court Decision be made, unless it stands at the elbows of Both Judges and Attorneys,  alongside a good knowledge of the original, 'not versioned or attempt to translate a lifestyle, principled way of living - not present in any "modern" world with the absence of Latin, Greek, Hebrew - '  KJV of The Bible...and "The Book of Mormon" because it started in 1823 and closely parallels US History since principle applied, is represented in ALL Three. 

SNYDER v. PHELPS ET AL. No. 09–751.  Argued October 6, 2010—Decided March 2, 2011
at,   https://www.oyez.org/cases/2010/09-751  :

        In summary: the Court found that the law of tort was being applied against the protesters not in a "content neutral" but rather in a "content based" or "viewpoint based" manner; the protesters were engaged in political speech, they were expressing themselves about a matter of public concern, not merely private matters; the protesters were in a place that is considered part of the "public forum;" and the protesters did not disrupt the funeral"!!!!   So much for "see" the Laws of God via 'homo sapiens'; and their 'whiles of Satan' are also reflected in Mt. Soledad; AZ v. Federal Government of Obama and Holder; and Wisconsin's State Government vs. Union's definition of their 'special rights as members-administrators-attorneys fraudulent use of taxpayer money'! And so much for 30 articles of socialist communist, 1947-1949 'udhr creeds of UNTRUTH #18, 19, "Everyone has a right to their opinion." falsity because 'They also have the responsibility for that "opinion" when [not if] they are Wrong! The responsibility of the opinion is the second part of 'opinion' which flies out the window of ignorance and "avoid 

 Whole, art. iii Supreme Court does not want any reference to God, nor to Principles as Lessons which Jesus taught.  Because only human-kind's written law is allowed [Matt. 7, these men are called Pharisees]. Satan, because he represents the disobedient, sinner, wrongdoer, profane, unjust are the reason for a court;  his whiles, can pretty much distort, misuse, and covet ignorance allowing judges to come to illogical conclusions from want of correct information and from want of God's Law or the last sentence of Amendment VII "and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any court of the United States, than according to the RULES OF COMMON LAW."   That's means 'Sir William Blackstone's " Commentaries on the Laws of England" which gives God's Law Full Measure as the origins of Law because "..Such, among others, are these principles: that we should live honestly, should hurt nobody, and should render to everyone his dues; to which three general precepts Justinian has reduced to whole doctrine of the law...".  There is a lot more in "Excepts from.." located in the appendix of the first edition of "Learn and Teach The Declaration and The U.S Constitution using original texts and the Classical Learning Method of the Founders [Research, Reflect, Relate, Record] by Joseph Andrews at www.teachconstitution.org.  Of course, reading it for it's completeness as Joseph did, is much more important; but at least there is a representation of part of reflection, relating, and recording of the Truth contained in the excerpt.   



It is time, after 391 years [don't discount each of the colony's laws], to reaffirm "assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of nature and of Nature's God entitle them,....  that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among............That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men,  deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed...".  We Must Allow the Promise of the Declaration be part of the Fulfillment of the Promise in the Constitution to prevail over the whiles of mankind, especially of the thrones of Executive/bureaucratic power; legislative who have forgotten or learned about both from the same public school system that forbids or does not obey its own laws to be sure All American History is Taught.... so that  "I believe it is my duty to my country to love it, to support its Constitution [Declaration], to obey its laws, to respect its Flag [in memory of Lance Corporal Laurence Snyder...to Mt. Soledad..and to all of US(A) to have given their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred Honor...because they understood or simply because they inherently have the Trust in the Virtue of those they love.

For all young people old enough to understand You Shall Not continue your life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness for yourselves and your Posterity; until you understand the terrible, dark ages, of Social Justice which is not social or even justice...because God is justice; man is Not Capable unless mankind seeks God, Jesus and the Way, the Truth, and the Light......  God is Magnificent, "King of Glory...King of Kings, and Lord of Lords.."... as well as the Best choice for the unique, sovereign person you are because you were born in the United States of America with Founders who knew human nature and Freedom from God and His Son - Jesus.   

That the art of controlling human nature to keep government within the realm of reason to serve people....we must always be "A wise and frugal government...shall restrain men from injuring one another, shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good government. (Thomas Jefferson, 1st inaugural Address, 3/4/1801 - almost 210 yrs. ago, to the day.)  This is a reflection of one of the Constitutional General Principles:  "The polity, or society, is created by the social contract, in which persons agree to join together for mutual benefit and defense, and to regulate their behavior to avoid forms of competition which are destructive of social coherence and effectiveness, such as violence, deception, or collusion, or to infringe on the rights of others."

"See" the Law - Docket #09-751 is about both of The First Amendment's "no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech.. with God's Laws and "The Declaration of Constitutional Principles" as avoiding "depriving others of those rights", a.k.a. the purpose of Court of Law. 


Justice has not been done in the Case of Lance Corporal Matthew Snyder, his father, or any American paying attention to principles of law which our nation has worked upon since 1620. A member of homo sapiens  -  the minister with his license - does not answer to breaking God's Laws: Thou Shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain; Do not bear false witness against thy neighbor...;  Do unto others as you would have others do unto you.  With this much "disobedience" to God's Laws, the minister gave up his right to protection under #   8. License; improper familiarity; violation of the rules of decorum; with a plural. Beware of what are called innocent freedoms."; with civil liberty is an exemption from the arbitrary will of others, which exemption is secured by established laws, which restrain every man from injuring or controlling another. ..".

http://www.matthewsnyder.org/help.html  is the website for Matthew.  An American asking for justice from "The Rule of Law" Court; been denied that justice, and has the court costs to manage. Please visit and help if you can.

*"Declaration of Constitutional Principles" by Jon Roland available at https://www.constitution.org/consprin.htm  
**regime: "An unconstitutional statute is not a law, no matter how vigorously it may be enforced. Enforcement does not make what is enforced the law. What is enforced is regime. In a constitutional republic, the law and the regime should coincide.  If they do not, the regime is not law but anti-law."