the judget: Well, I agree with that. I am not in a position to decide what God's Will is, and nor will I be attempting to interpret or enforce that. ..---
1) Article III judge who has no ORAL, COMMON LAW, OATH IN PLEDGE - ARTICLE VI. What was impossible to UNDERSTAND, continues to adjudicate, uscathed, to this nanosecond - is supreme Law of the Land, v.16-18 below in reality - Actually Does Not Exist - and the shock of that calumniation did work, quite well for the judge, but not completely, since, whether or not, man-choosing and serving-man agrees with Holy Spirit One God in Three Persons is, at this point "The Three Sacred Documents" BOUND BY "OATH, n. [Sax. ath; Goth. aiths; D. eed; G. eid; Sw. ed; Dan. æed.] A solemn affirmation or declaration, made with an appeal to God for the truth of what is affirmed. The appeal to God in an oath, implies that the person imprecates his vengeance and renounces his favor if the declaration is false; or if the declaration is a promise, the person invokes the vengeance of God if he should fail to fulfill it. A false oath is called perjury; intrinsic to,
"10. For God is not vnrighteous, to forget your worke and labour of loue, which yee haue shewed toward his Name, in that yee haue ministred to the Saints, and doe minister.
11 And wee desire, that euery one of you doe shewe the same diligence, to the full assurance of hope vnto the ende:
12 That yee be not slothfull, but followers of them, who through faith and patience inherite the promises.
13 For when God made promise to Abraham, because hee could sweare by no greater, he sware by himselfe,
14 Saying, Surely, blessing I will blesse thee, and multiplying I wil multiply thee.
15 And so after he had patiently indured, he obtained the promise.
16 For men verily sweare by the greater, and an oath for confirmation is to them an end of all strife.
17 Wherein God willing more abundantly to shewe vnto the heyres of promise the immutabilitie of his counsell, confirmed it by an oath:
18 That by two immutable things [the Oath and the Promise], in which it was impossible for God to lye, wee might haue a strong consolation, who haue fled for refuge to lay hold vpon the hope set before vs.
19 Which hope we haue as an anker of the soule both sure and stedfast, and which entreth into that within the vaile,
20 Whither the forerunner is for vs entrrd; euen Iesus, made an high Priest for euer after the order of Melchisedec." at, https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/1611_Hebrews-Chapter-6/ DOES NOT EXIST AS THIS CURSOR FLASHES. WORSE, LIKE THE WORD "SLAVERY" IN 1828- 1861 - Pres. Lincoln's First Inaugeral Address, then the Emancipation -- SLAVERY* WAS NEVER DEFINED; AND RIGHT NOW, ORAL, COMMON LAW= HONOR AND OATH IN PLEDGE DO NOT EXIST
--WORLDWIDE--; AND injury is solely the 5 senses, there is no such idea as 'waterboarding solely by "LANGUAGE, or SPEECH is the utterance of articulated sounds or Voices, rendered significant by usage, for the EXPRESSION AND COMMUNICATION of THOUGHTS" from any person's mouth directly in that picasecond to God's Ear; a.k.a., Matt. 15:
" 7. Yee hypocrites, well did Esaias prophecie of you, saying,
8 This people draweth nigh vnto mee with their mouth, and honoureth mee with their lips: but their heart is farre from me. (Esa/ Isiah 29:14)
9 But in vaine they do worship me, teaching for doctrines, the commandements of men.
10 ¶ And he called the multitude, and said vnto them, Heare and vnderstand.
11 Not that which goeth into the mouth defileth a man: but that which commeth out of the mouth, this defileth a man.
12 Then came his disciples, and said vnto him, Knowest thou that the Pharisees were offended after they heard this saying?
13 But he answered and said, Euery plant which my heauenly father hath not planted, shalbe rooted vp. (John 13:2)
14 Let them alone: they be blinde leaders of the blinde. And if the blinde lead the blinde, both shall fall into the ditch.
15 Then answered Peter, and said vnto him, Declare vnto vs this parable.
16 And Iesus said, Are yee also yet without vnderstanding?
17 Doe not yee yet vnderstand, that whatsoeuer entreth in at the mouth, goeth into the belly, and is cast out into the draught [drain]?
18 But those things which proceed out of the mouth, come forth from the heart, and they defile the man.
19 For out of the heart proceed euill thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witnes, blasphemies. (Gen. 6:3 and 8:21)
20 These are the things which defile a man: But to eate with vnwashen hands, defileth not a man."
"..It should always be remembered that this law, natural or revealed, made for men or for nations, flows from the same Divine source: it is the Law of God. Nature, or to speak more properly, the Author of Nature, has done much for us, but it is His gracious appointment and will, that we should also do as much for ourselves. What we do , indeed, must be founded on what He has done; and the deficienies of our laws must be supplied by the perfection of His. Human law must rest its authority ultimately, upoon that Law which is divine. Of that Law, the following are maxims ---that no injury be done ---that a lawful engagement, voluntarily made, should be faithfully fulfilled. We now see the deep and solid foundations of human law. From this short, but plain and, I hope, just [Truth-God] statement of things, we perceive a principle of connection between the two laws mentioned [the profession of Divinity and the profession of Law], far from being rivals or enemies, religion and law are twin sisters, friends, and mutual assistants. Indeed, these two sciences run into each other. .." at Google Books, "The Works of the Honorable James Wilson, L.L.D.; And
Law and Liberty cannot rationally become the objects of our love, unless they first become objects of our Knowledge."- Hosea 4:6 "Because you have forgotten The Law of Your God"; Religion and the Law; pg. 1008, "American Patriot's Bible, the Word of God and the Shaping of America"; Richard G. Less, Editor, Thomas Nelson, Publisher since 1769, on the occasion of the 400th Anniversary of the Reformation-Protest-Bible of Holy Spirit-Truth, 1611 KJV with Apocrypha [ROA#81, 12/8; APP 151 EXHIBIT LIST; Pg. 1/ lines 22-28]
From "Declaration of Constitutional Principles", Jon Roland, Constitution Society - the members of which, also maintain silence regarding "Abrogation of the prerogatives of God" in that "The Constitution is supreme Law of the Land" - solely by ignoring Article IV protection of each State, the residence of a Constitutional Person, from invasion, also meaning "infringement of Right/ God/ Truth/ Oral Common Law/ Oath in Pledge, Two Greatest Commands of God.... but then no-one does anywhere, not even among the 5 living Presidents - 2 of whom are impeached, but just one, Benghazi murder of americans on American soil among those they know and will never know, as does The Only supreme Law of the Land - Judge - is walking away unscathed just like Cain's murder of Able, one has no knowledge whatsoever, and two have always followed FDR and Mrs. Roosevelt who was the Chair of the socialist communist UDHR, no American accepted in 1949; anymore than they did the 1947, "This decision Should Be Reversed" by 4 Justices of Truth, great and impenetrable Wall of separation a person's Religion and Morality directly to his God, not a church in any form of rights, creeds, ceremonies, forms, denominations, or compulsion of conscience/ workers of iniquity, grapes from thorns, figs from thistles: from "Declaration of Constitutional Principles" [In use from USDC's fingers] - Jon Roland, Constitution Society:
Whereas, during the course of history usurpers have attempted to misconstrue certain principles of constitutional republican government for their own ends, and that the original language of the Constitution for the United States did not anticipate all the ways it might be misinterpreted, we hereby set forth some of those principles with greater clarity, using more modern language:
"[numbers are added for reference int his Remonstrance: in disquisition, taught to me by The Founders, my Parents, Great uncle and great aunt, and two Judges, among learning my own, "hog-on-ice" Third Person]...1.Upon establishment of the social contract, the natural right of what in the state of nature would be self defense is transformed into the duty to defend the state and the constitution, including oneself as a member of the state.
2.Defense of the state and the constitution includes defense against threats of all kinds, including invasion or attack, insurrection, criminal acts, natural or manmade disasters, or public ignorance or apathy.
3.A citizen not only has the duty to obey the law, but to help enforce it, within his ability, and to do what he can to prepare himself and others to do so.
4.The judgement of the consistency of an official act with the constitution is called constitutional review. When this duty is performed by a judge, it is called judicial review. It is not a power of government but the exercise of a duty of citizenship.
5.Each level and jurisdiction of government has been delegated the power to punish as crimes the deprivation of constitutional and civil rights of persons by agents of government, and some governments the power to punish deprivation of rights by individuals not agents of government. Statutes to implement those powers have been enacted in almost every jurisdiction, and they cover almost every such deprivation.
6.Any act performed by an agent of government which is unconstitutional is illegal, and while performing that act the person ceases to be an agent of government or to have any official status, regardless of what trappings of office or color of law he may project. It is also almost certainly a deprivation of the civil rights of someone, and therefore also a violation of one or more of the constitutional criminal laws against doing so.
7.Any citizen who becomes aware of an illegal or unconstitutional act of an apparent official, which is a criminal deprivation of rights, has the duty to disobey that act, to report it as a crime, and to arrest the offender and deliver him to a court of competent jurisdiction for prosecution...." at, http://www.constitution.org/consprin.htm
********************
In these two disquisitions, not presented in chronological order, both "Constitutional - Civil", one in U.S. District Court, the other in Superior Court with 3 side trips to Appellate, plus, Reinstate, Brief, 15 minute Oral Presentation, Appeal the Decision, there were 7 Judges, 1 State Attorney General now seated as a Senator, with 3 associate A-G's, 3 Attorneys [not counting one-substitute who said I should get another attorney]+ their firm's Senior Partner, 2 administrative-state-Directors, a Plaintive, her Manager; and the entire course of these disquisitions taking place within, and directly applicable to the 01/20/2009 anti-Republic under God Regime, delusional adversarial democracy's socialist, communist UDHR, atheism = No Oral, Common Law/ Oath in Pledge, from 03/01//2009 to this flashing cursor:
I WROTE AND ARGUED BOTH OF THESE DISQUISITION SOLELY IN THE ORAL, COMMON LAW; and I DID NOT PRESENT ANY OF THE "PROPOSED EXHIBIT LIST" in the 11/30 Trial Court, especially not in the 11/30 Trial Court-Exhibit List, both because I accidently, in my extreme apprehension, left them at home, and could not find until several months later, and because of the immediate, within 2 mins. after introductions, the barrage, transcribed as a dialog, was the first 'thing' the judge of calumny initiated.
I did know, in advance, that my case was already predetermined-conclusion in complete bias: That there would be no Oath, but I would be required, not because I worry one way or another, but because, solely a huge double-standard - blasphemed in great calumniation;-- though, while in that courtroom for another reason, witnessed a lady sitting sideways, in a chair, head down, knees together, repeating "It isn't right, It isn't fair," as her attorney stood at the podium interchanging with the judge.
BTW, UD courts are never recorded, always just the one judge, and most important always private, never public. This because the greatest power of Article III's betrayal in perdition is they do 'it in secret' - even, until just in the last 2 or 3 weeks, didn't even allow cameras in their courtrooms. Also, the Court Clerks US District, Superior Clerks both Division and County, Appellate Clerks DO NOT ANSWER THE TELEPHONE, NOR OFFER ANY HELP WHATSOEVER -- A MAJOR CHANGE FROM WHEN I WAS GOING BACK AND FORTH.
That the only argument, Plaintive had left-- the judge alone, decided on performing the traduced, water-boarding of mind/ heart/ because I had learned a lot from the US District Court about my fingers supreme to God, ruled by a 'regulation' - not even a statute and to this flashing courso, nurses also do not have their phone calls answered by BRN, nor does BRN treat any nurse with respect -- only the degradation of 'fingers please' and don't disobey.
I love God and Christ, it is part of the reason I even entered nursing, to be a direct Witness in Testimony, then over 1 year later, presented with a forged, "the minute order is even in writing!"-the day before the "decision-statement" leaning forward, the third of three, consensus committee, where "all have to agree", but not one has to obey Oral Common Law, from that 1/3rd directly to God's Ear - in the 15 minute, would you believe how incredible that misconstruction in abuse actually occurred, 15 minute 'Oral Presentation' the 11/30 judge refused to notify the Appellate Court he would not attend - and he reversed his "judgment" and paid court fees -- actually believing that a 'court rule' is supreme to God, though at that time - even though I repeated in my 15 minutes probably oldest in any English speaking world, "The Truth, THE ---WHOLE---TRUTH, and no THING BUT THE TRUTH" and the judges do not recognize DUE PROCESS/ JUSTICE/ RIGHT/ TRUTH ---
As you read the PDF's, you can readily see what I didn't know and how inexperience grew; and when confronted with flat-out fraud on at least 3 procedural/ pleading occasions, knew that suppression of due process, justice, right/ Truth, along with PPAA, shall never, again enter an Article III Judiciary --
Judges: 2 Judges: the Us District Court, who adjudicated the Whole case, alone; and the 12/22 Supervising Judge for Unlawful Detained that isn't a crime human or moral, but had "right of possession" of my Amendment 4 and 9 Property; and involved a 'room mate' who was in his second UD, that I helped out, which I have done, more than once, are very important, for both, did, indeed, guide and help me tremendously, the District Judge quite within his adjudication, actually guided me into how to present my argument, without even acknowledging he was doing that...
The Supervising UD Judge, now in the Appellate Court, on 12/22 ExParte, taught me ORAL LAW from my mouth directly to God's Ear. He conducted my filed, in which the N.County Clinic walked me thru, totally in ORAL LAW, there was no-thing written. He adjudicated solely on the Procedural/ Pleadings, 11/30 Trial Court, and 12/8 App 151 with Exhibits, noting to me directly, the definition of WHOLE - so important to any argument in a court.
This fact would be totally ignored by the 3 Appellate Court's Wholly ORAL LAW PRESENTATION, as was my Brief on the details regarding the forgery of names of the Present Attorney, for the correct Attorney's name is typed on the Minute Order. The three Appellate judges joined the two attorneys in collusion in supporting the forced transcript, and the "it's even in writing minute order", thus adding each-one's very own, abrogation of their mind/ heart/ conscience against, as each-one-person against the prerogatives of God's Oral Law -- because they do not believe that ORAL, COMMON LAW, -HONOR IS SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND, and thus, TRUTH IS WHAT I REPORTED, including the fact that the judge, himself demonstrates he has no ORAL LAW OATH, along with his -and the three Appellate judges - that man is supreme to God, that The Creator in the Declaration is not the same Creator of supreme Law of the Land, but spirit of devil trinity has his very own top of the highest mountain and all the kingdom's grandeur..
All 5 Judges, the Attorney General/ State Senator, and Associate AG's, the former administrative-police-state Director and EDD Acting Director, for fingers are not supreme any Person's Oral Law in Holy Spirit-Truth/ Right - God; or that "The Law is never made against a Righteous Person in American God Is Law.
Not one of these Persons in Profession of Law, absent God, has any intention of obedience to the Contents of Trinity Sacred Documents: But all three shall call my Person of Oral Law in Oath and Pledge, as well as demonstrated clinical skills and leadership, as well as UNDERSTANDING The Truth, The WHOLE tRUTH, and No Thing but The Truth - as noted in Declaration of constitutional Principles all will continue against those they know and will never know through tyranny, extortion and "an injury offered to God, by denying that which is due and belonging to him, or attributing to him that which is not agreeable to his nature.".
That problem is rampant throughout Article III, those of whom have, all by themselves, caused destruction of one Person is one vote = Consent of the governed through abuse of words and physical measures instead of knowledge upon which to make good decisions on issues and candidates;
Alabama's "skin color" post-slavery" for a UN Papal authority's UN delusional-adversarial democracy's socialist atheism labeled DEM, who shall never obey any ORAL LAW/ of God, and takes an oath with his forked tongue, God Knows very well, vote against God and Nation first - they are forbidden to learn --in school or even in public information sources v. a Judge Moore who placed The Ten Commandments in the lobby of his Court building, to be told in force- by another judge, he has no human precept right to perform that act to which the Trinity Sacred Documents are written by men in the name of God in Three Persons;
the State Department decree in edict it is greater than We the People and Article II - refusing to change passports and documentation, because of "investigations" that Article II has no Right to be Article II, the the truth of Jerusalem is the Capital of Israel and only the United States, the location of your Person's residence, and Czechoslovakia are following God, not man-choosing and serving in slave-hood to spirit of devil trinity;
"Liberal Judge Gives Black Torturer Of Disabled White Teen Walk, History Shows Motivation" Posted by Austin Lewis | Dec 11, 2017, probably impossible not to be able to disclose how many more violations of Oral Common Law/ Oath in Pledge, Two Greatest Commands of God performed by a 'bully and a gang against one person', whatever physical characteristics are involved, bearing in mind that none of those persons, including the judge-- has ever even heard of Oral Law One God in Three Persons-Holy Spirit Truth-is Trinity Sacred Documents-- and learn liberty of most good the Love of God, Joy of Christ Jesus, and challenge of learning your very own Third Person; the previous 01/20/2009 anti-Republic under God regime's usurper of hate his nation far beyond any of his predecessors combined, protected foreign law, Papal Authority's UN - "Exiled Government of delusional adversarial democracy's collective mass people, thinks he has aided the rise in stock market: But, for every corporate Person composed of individual persons' who has elected to leave our nation and provide employments in any nation, but our Republic under God: they are killing their own Nation and their fellow-country-persons- commerce in our Nation of, by, and for We the People-- so no there isn't any 'highest stock market-'- for that is the death knell of destruction -- the tax money goes directly to government getting to be the richest conglomeration of administrative-police-state controlling and manipulative what few genuine commerce companies try to stay here in our Republic under God--
The Supervising Judge recognized that I was doing my responsibilities as a Citizen of my State of Residence in my Nation of God - He did not have an audio tape of the 11/30 trial - there was none available, nor on 12/24 at both N. County and County Court Records - 22 days after the Trial Court.. The Trial Court Audio was transcribe 10/22/2016, and arrived in Appellate Clerks Office in late December.
Both these Judges knew the Truth that Oath in supreme Law of the Land was, indeed, violated, but because "truth of God" is judged by man-serving-man, no case can be immediately adjudicated-closed when #'s 2,3, 5,6, 7 are fact in evidence, because ORAL LAW/ OATH IN PLEDGE is GOD, THE ETERNAL LIVING CREATOR - "For when God made promise to Abraham, because hee could sweare by no greater, he sware by himselfe, ... For men verily sweare by the greater, and an oath for confirmation is to them an end of all "STRIFE/ STRIVE, v.i. [pret. strove; pp. striven. G. streben; D. streeven; Sw. sträfva; Dan. stræber; formed perhaps on the Heb. רוב. This word coincides in elements with drive, and the primary sense is nearly the same. See Rival.] 1. To make efforts; to use exertions; to endeavor with earnestness; to labor hard; applicable to exertions of body or mind. A workman strives to perform his task before another; a student strives to excel his fellows in improvement. Was it for this that his ambition strove / To equal Cesar first, and after Jove? – Cowley. Strive with me in your prayers to God for me. – Rom. xv. Strive to enter in at the strait gate. – Luke xiii.
2. To contend; to contest; to struggle in opposition to another; to be in contention or dispute; followed by against or with before the person or thing opposed; as, strive against temptation; strive for the truth. My spirit shall not always strive with man. – Gen. vi.
3. To oppose by contrariety of qualities. Now private pity strove with public hate, / Reason with rage, and eloquence with fate. – Derham.
4. To vie; to be comparable to; to emulate; to contend in excellence. Not that sweet grove / Of Daphne by Orontes, and the inspir'd / Castalian spring, might with this paradise / Of Eden strive. – Milton."
I only learned probably late October-early November 2017 about SC "Abomination Tariff against property, violations of Articles IV and VI, Amendments 4 and IX, Oral Law/ Oath in God's Second greatest Command, Supremacy Clause in Preemptive Clause without ever defining the word Slavery - hence, the reason the Southern skin-color slavery, Colonies had to declare was on the Northern Slavery women, children, seafaring-mining men, Colonies; law applied not uniformly and directed to slavery, alone, as, Right/ Truth/ God-Contract of Constitution and supreme Law of the Land, Water, Atmosphere- omitted because oath is omitted, 'he who is without sin' and I have and continue to have, the Oral Law-Honor to "Worship and serve only my Lord God with "Abide by what I say and you really will be disciples of mine. You WILL UNDERSTAND THE TRUTH AND THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE/ GOD IS TRUTH.
I have actually learned about Truth because I have worked backwards in God's Eras of history - I worked from what the Founder's Wrote about the contents of the Trinity Sacred Documents; and I DID NOT CARY ANY PREDETERMINED CONCLUSIONS REGARDING WHAT I SHOULD OR SHOULD NOT READ IN THE whole Holy Bible + Dr. James Moffatt's direct Translation 1921 bible - the sole Bible of RIGHT REASON with both the Reformists, Dead Sea Scrolls and using the same Truth the 50 Clergy of the 1611 KJV and then, knocked, asked, seek and always find-- whatever I'm looking for, and because of the unique nature of my shared roof, and a friend with a very unique complex of meningioma's causing pressure upon specific areas of Cerebrum, Medulla, Pons and Brain Stem, and because my BSN is from Mt. St. Mary's College-Sister Callista Roy's "Adaptation Model of TOTAL PERSON CARE-PHYSIOLOGY BODY TO HEART/ MIND/ CONSCIENCE FOR WILL-- I have been and will continue TO STAND FOR MY GOD AND MY NATION'S VERY UNIQUE, REFORMATION TRUTH, TRUST, AND PROMISE....THE 1611 THREE TESTAMENT WHOLE HOLY BIBLE".
I do not serve man. I serve and work to learn more and more about my own Liberty of most good...and most evil - and to teach everyone... I realized, some-thing I hadn't really worried about --- I was indeed, fact and evidence, attempting to have the three attorneys and the two judges of the Superior court Case removed.
When I gave my Oral Presentation, I caused quite a stir between two of the three Appellate Judges when I stated, Oral Law in full effect, but all 3 Appellate Judges have forgotten God is solely Oral Law, that two attorneys had joined the judge in collusion over the attorney actual sitting and hearing the case. For the judge had the 'minute order' changed, apparently while I was still present, and after the dismissal of the Court Trial 11/30-part.
Because I argued solely Oral Law/ Oath, I also reported to the 15 minute, Oral Presentation that I had not notified the Plaintive Attorneys of the "Hidden in Plain Sight: "Request for Specific Basis for OSC Re: Sanctions; Memorandum of Points and Authorities; Notice of Withdrawal of Demurrer" prepared by my Attorney and filed on 11/12/2015, AM11:04" added as an Amendment to "Statement on Appeal-Reinstate filed 03/08/2016, because it was not discovered until preparing that Remonstrance. Reason: Same as why I did not present "Proposed Exhibits in the 11/30 -- once there is no Oath, there is no Law, and, "Why, throw 'pearls among swine who have, throughout the entire procedural/ pleading from 06/18/2015 to this application of my Person to the love of my One Constitutional-Person, Third Person in Holy Spirit and my Helper, Comforter, Friend, who like, Esdras in Apocrypha, would often say, 'not to meddle with things beyond my reach", my deep Honor, Duty, and Service in my SOLELY ORAL LAW, FROM MY MOUTH DIRECTLY TO GOD'S EAR...
While I was aware of the 'stranger in the court-room, as I was leaving that judges 'rhelm of power', I didn't notice, and I am observant, but not when, I have just been water-boarded by a judge who has no Truth whatsoever, and has no compunction in his lying -- it was quite overwhelming, but didn't change the Truth. SIMPLY TRUTH HAS NO PLACE IN ARTICLE III SINCE AT LEAST 1947, probably, given Justice Brandeis and Precedent, 1937; and that is not an opinion, that is a demonstrated fact in evidence.
The Attorney in the 12/22, Supervising Judge - TOTALLY ORAL LAW EX PARTE, was the other, not in attendance or involved with 11/30 actions of the trial court, was the Attorney, 3 times, agreeing he understood ORAL LAW, not to exercise "The Judgement until the appeal process is complete.".
All of this is within the disquisitions. KEEPING THIS SECRET TO PROTECT THE VIOLATIONS OF ORAL LAW-OATH IN PLEDGE IS THE REASON OUR REPUBLIC UNDER GOD IS EXPERIENCING TREASON AND TYRANNY -- plus the fact that the current "Jesus walking on earth, has forgotten he is just another person of liberty of most good and most evil-- where evil is the ruler by workers of iniquity -- man hiding Scripture, and even writing it to fit, a predetermined conclusion, and also, keeping it very secret, then excommunicating, decreeing heretic, or other "group-think, isolation banishments" of persons who will not follow in silence, any perversion of Paul's Church of Liberty of God in Christ Jesus, Holy Living Trinity --- Truth:
It is presented here, because of How Specific Articles IV, VI, and both Preambles are Written to and in the name of The Creator of the "collective name of heaven and earth all that belong to them; the WHOLE SYSTEM OF CREATED THINGS" --- YOU, READER, YOUR HERITAGE, MY HERITAGE IS NOT DEAD: THEY ARE SITTING IN HEAVEN, KNOWING EXACTLY WHAT IS GOING-DOWN ON WORLD-DOWN-BELOW and Yes, their Eternal Living Souls, just as much for your past family, friends, and family-not by blood, but by shared life role experiences, never to be duplicated, in which both, or all involved gained such Love/ God, Joy/ Christ Jesus 2,017th Celebrated, but He has been since before Abraham, and thus, quite present during "Captivity"-Apocrypha, just that part of thee reason for captivity, is that when anyone, or any nation, or any group-think of supremacy's subsidiarity, turn their back to our Father, His Son, we turn our back on our own Person, and the consequences are as diffuse in abject subjugation and slave-hood, as they are glorious in HOLY SPIRIT, ONE GOD IN THREE PERSONS IS TRINITY SACRED DOCUMENTS.
There was no way I could have predicted that I would be confronted with a person who has no Oath, nor any intention to be held to an Oath; and, in addition, not my attorney, never physiologically present and therefore, not at all recognized as my resource for CA Statutory Law of his more than 36 years of expertise, in which he did exactly as he contracted with me to do, and since I paid by 30 minute intervals, could flow with my Social Security check and even continue to pay my rent, on time for 4 years in that location, up until 08/01/2015 the "Judgment" for the Third Same Offense -
