The Tyranny of the Majority is the...

reason that, absent “God’s Laws and Morality”, sexual deviation shall be taught to 5 to 22 year old members of posterity;

— that the word illegal meaning “Not legal; unlawful; contrary to law; illicit; as an illegal act; illegal trade.”, shall  mean....social justice deems the socialist group named “Mexican who illegally entered US borders”;  and
— that Sovereignty of Nation is removed from the history of the United States, by this ‘majority’ of “elected residents”; including the integrity which respect law and actions of all “Persons” who cross legally; And
—that ‘contrary to law’ illegal individual shall be granted the “privileges and immunities” as largesse from government against both Natural and Naturalized Citizens of the Constitution(S);
— and
therefore allows government force and power of money, over the property, as life, liberty and pursuit of happiness called earnings of tax-paying citizens, with laws of government over “consent of the governed” determined and defined 100% by number (<less than 7,000 for sex to children; < 12.000 for unlawful individuals).....NO PRINCIPLES OF “RELIGION AND MORALITY, OATH OF OFFICE, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE REPUBLIC UNDER GOD.  “Obsolete” in view of the Socialist Power-force-decree doctrine of group, collective mass-think and “all people are equal, as long as they properly fit into socialist-dictated groups named illegal, wealthy of >$499,999 + $1.00, and
 — are not part of any business enterprise and do not control any amount of money  ...because the socialist’s-owned government take care of everything each individual ‘Body’ requires..

Forget the ‘Soul’(person is comprised of a body and soul) part of our Republic’s, Constitutional Principle of the individual component of the polity is the Person as a member of the species homo sapiens with cognitive attributes including Both the ability to compete for life, liberty and pursuit of happiness And
the capacity to regulate the competitive actions to Avoid Depriving Others of Those Natural Rights”;....as a concept totally abhorrent to the few men controlled government named Socialism.

The Socialist State of California shall allow control of all professions and work be defined, determined, inspected, regulated as the entire substructure  via union-controlled, Departments, Boards of Equalization;  .. And
Schools (including the demise of Charter Schools via refusal for new charters...and moving very, very slowly to meet the needs of charter schools already in existence; as school districts when California’s judicial at the Supreme Court level refusing to hear cases it deems unnecessary..as By Area Trustee Election System (BATES) v. 1776 At Large Election System(1776ALES);  so that public, indoctrination schools can continue “It all begins with me”, mass, collective “cooperation” learn group think, of elementary children –except the children of Charter Education;

that city councils, county, state, and the Guaranteed Republican form of government will bow to the ‘race’ / skin color and ‘culture’ / ‘naturalized citizens with a country-of-origin-other than the U.S. ‘percentage as BATES applied in addition to the school boards;
that the “Citizens Redistricting Commission” shall place 'skin color' and ‘country of origin other than the U.S.’ as supreme in forming the Districts/Precincts of this State because of social justice named “protected class”;

that because there is one software (binomial/Boolean, yes-no/ absent ‘soul’ of person) program shall form Every-Type of District/Precinct (approximately 6 types), with inherently determined gerrymandering an absolute requirement for the location of Representatives of “majority” to live and perpetuate into the Soros-Obama-UN World of borderless nations and jurisprudence...Except for the Socialist control....And

“Persons” <50 have no idea of what the above means to each one person’s sovereignty of ‘soul’ as life, liberty, and pursuit of anything ...stating “See! I’m here in the park joining with my friends, there is no change in my freedom.”or OWS; unless government determined, inspected, defined, and adjudicated with punishment absent court or due process;

and that “(a)..All voters may vote at a voter-nominated primary election for any candidate for congressional and state elective office without regard to the political party preference disclosed by the candidate or the voter..... . “.. (b) Except as otherwise provided by Section 6, a candidate for a congressional or state elective office may have his or her political party preference, or lack of political party preference, indicated upon the ballot for the office in the manner provided by statute. A political party or party central committee shall not nominate a candidate for any congressional or state elective office at the voter-nominated primary. (Article II: 5 California Constitution).  

These two Constitutional Section statements remove the word “PRIMARY” or the “Consent of the governed” to choose a Candidate by their Political Party Affiliation (that which is occurring now in the other 49 States). The Republican Party has always had to WAIT UNTIL AFTER THE PRIMARY, before endorsing or supporting any candidate. Please note,

Political Party does NOT INCLUDE SOCIALISM’s precepts or Union-chosen Candidates for Office. These TWO POLITICAL PARTIES are INHERENT to the word “Democratic Party”.  But that Party has undergone the “tyranny of the majority” to totally be absent any voice of dissension within it.  For the record Hawaii and Washington both have top-two vote getters; and the party of lesser number has no voice. Also, ‘consent of the governed’s closest voice is the House which DOES NOT LIST OUR REPRESENTATIVES BY THEIR POLITICAL PARTY, only by the #of which District/Precinct that Representative is attached to (click on any House Bill at www.thomas.gov). The Senate returned the Party Label to their Bills, Acts, and Amendments.

 It is virtually impossible to have ‘consent of the governed’ and be absent the Philosophy of Government of Party.  Party: “ 1. A number of persons united in opinion or design, in opposition to others in the community. It differs from faction, in implying a less dishonorable association, or more justifiable designs. Parties exist in all governments; and free governments are the hot-beds of party...”.  Politics: “The science of government; that part of ethics which consists in the regulation and government of a nation or state, for the preservation of its safety, peace and prosperity; comprehending the defense of its existence and rights against foreign control or conquest, the augmentation of its strength and resources, and the protection of its citizens in their rights, with the preservation and improvement of their morals. Politics, as a science or an art, is a subject of vast extent and importance.”

Despotism: “1. Absolute power; authority unlimited and uncontrolled by men, constitution or laws, and depending alone on the will of the prince; as the despotism of a Turkish sultan. 2. An arbitrary government, as that of Turkey and Persia [And now the State of California with Federal Level via Obama Regime]  shall be repeated by “ The candidates who are the top two vote-getters at a voter-nominated primary election for a congressional or state elective office shall, regardless of party preference, compete in the ensuing general election.(Article II: 5(a))”; and that

2012 elections results are finished and complete this day, with number determining Constitutionality of illegals, content of history as social and politically acceptable via the ‘tyranny of the majority’ intact and able to continue usurpation, despotism, and complete removal of not only the U.S. Constitution; but also the California Constitution, already complete with only the ballots to be cast electronically. THE ELECTION of OUR REPRESENTATIVES of PARTY occurs on June 5, 2012, 149 weeks away!!!!! The top-two vote getters regardless of party shall rule as government - not philosophy only number and laws only number not philosophy or "Rule of Law" as demonstrated above, unless voting citizens place AMERICA’s REPUBLIC UNDER GOD before any other Candidate, Issue, or topic under ‘consent by vote’ – especially the posterity of our young in education, etc.

BE very careful, at least one candidate of President is not what he seems....independent of Ron Paul’s “exposing Santorum..his website also exposes his ignorance under Executive “amendment to add personhood” to the U.S constitution + “proud of earmarks” placing spending taxpayer money over principle of governance - alone removes him as a Conservative..and more.

Just so each-Person in our Republic Understands, here is: “ A Principle of The Traditional American Philosophy - 12. The Majority - Limited for Liberty

". . . this sacred principle . . ." [Majority must respect Minority's rights] (President Jefferson's First Inaugural Address)

The Principle
1. The traditional American philosophy teaches that The Majority must be strictly limited in power, and in the operation of government, for the protection of The Individual's God-given, unalienable rights proclaimed in the Declaration of Independence and, therefore, of the rights of The Minority--of all minorities.

A Restricted Mechanic of Government

2. Self-government's system of rule by majority vote is based on necessity. Rule by majority vote is a necessary mechanic of any government of the popular type, featuring rule by the people through free, periodic elections such as, for example, those held in the United States. Under this philosophy, rule by majority vote is always subject to the "sacred principle" defined in President Jefferson's First Inaugural Address, quoted below.

"All, too, will bear in mind this sacred principle, that though the will of the majority is in all cases to prevail, that will to be rightful must be reasonable; that the minority possess their equal rights, which equal law must protect, and to violate would be oppression."

A Minority of One Protected

3. The protection provided by this principle applies fundamentally, of course, in favor of a minority of one: The Individual. No majority, however great even all of the people but one Individual--may properly infringe, or possess the power to infringe, the rights of any minority, however small--even a minority of a lone Individual.

America a Republic--Not a Democracy--In Form of Government--So As to Limit Effectively The Majority To Protect the Individual

4. Therein lies the reason why the American leaders who framed and ratified the United States Constitution in 1787-1788 chose, for America's form of government, that of a Republic and not a Democracy. (The then existing Confederation was merely a treaty arrangement between completely independent and separate State governments, by agreement of their legislatures only and not by consent of the people, with no real central government--with only a legislative body--and with no power over those governments or over individual citizens; so it provided no protection for the rights of The Individual or The Minority against tyranny by The Majority in any State--later remedied, as to certain rights, by prohibitions in the original Constitution expressly made applicable against the States.) A Republic is a constitutionally limited government of the representative type, created by a written Constitution--adopted by the people and changeable (from its original meaning) by them only by its amendment--with its powers divided between three separate Branches: Executive, Legislative and Judicial. In a Republic, the whole system is designed primarily to protect The Individual's unalienable rights--therefore The Minority, all minorities--against any violation by government or by others. As the Declaration of Independence expresses this American goal of safeguarding these rights, the people form their governments "to secure these rights"--to make and keep them secure.

The Majority Omnipotent in Any Democracy

5. This is not the case under a Democracy, speaking of it as a form of government and not merely in the more general sense of its meaning a popular type of government. In a Democracy, The Majority is omnipotent, whether it be a Representative Democracy or a Direct Democracy. In the Representative type, the people function governmentally through an elected legislature, which selects and controls the head of the Executive Department, as in Great Britain where "the authority of the parliament is transcendent and uncontrollable" (as stated in The Federalist number 53, by Madison)--where in fact the House of Commons alone has by law become supreme. In the Direct type, all of the electorate (those entitled to vote) assemble as a single group to debate and decide directly and conclusively all governmental questions. This is suitable only for a very small number of people--as in a New England town with a town-meeting system of government, or in a situation like that of the small city-states of ancient Greece. (Decisions of a New England town-meeting are, of course, subject to the State and United States Constitutions which protect the rights of The Individual and The Minority, so such a town-meeting government is not a true Democracy featuring The Majority Omnipotent.)

In a Democracy, The Individual Is Subservient and Must Be Submissive to The Omnipotent Majority

6. Any Democracy, either Representative or Direct, does not even recognize the existence of any unqualified rights of The Individual, much less his possessing God-given, unalienable rights as conceived by the American philosophy. A Democracy in America, as a form of government, would therefore provide no protection for these rights. Under a Democracy, Man is considered to have only qualified privileges permitted by The Majority in control of government and revocable by it at any time. This spells Rule by Omnipotent Majority, with The Individual and The Minority as well as all minorities victimized at the pleasure of The Majority, without limit and without any legal basis for objection or practical remedy. The idea of such unlimited rule, as if by "divine right of The Majority," is as abhorrent in the eyes of the traditional American philosophy as is the idea of rule by "divine right of kings."

The Uniquely American Principle Was Thoroughly Understood in 1776

7. The traditional American philosophy requires a Republic's constitutionally limited form of government for the security of Man's unalienable rights against violation by The Majority, by government, as well as by others. This philosophy was well understood in America in 1776 but was imperfectly practiced by the States in the post-1776 period, during which rights were violated. This correct understanding was exemplified by the previously noted (Par. 8, Principle 2) town-meeting petition of Pittsfield, Massachusetts, addressed to the legislature of Massachusetts in May, 1776. It urged the adoption by the people--as "the fountain of power"--of a Constitution as their fundamental law, to fill the void created by the end of royal rule, as "the first step to be taken" by the people in order to guard against despotism--against "the wanton exercise of power"--and it asserted, that the only safeguard is "the formation of a fundamental constitution" by the people. Their aim was to safeguard their liberties. This was accomplished by the people of Massachusetts in 1780, by their creating the first true Constitution and Republic in the world. They utilized successfully, for the first time in history, a constitutional convention--which is America's great, if not greatest, contribution to the mechanics of self-government through constitutional government. (Earlier Acts of Legislatures of other States were erroneously classified as "constitutions," while some countries' governments throughout history had generally been erroneously classified as "republics"--a much-misunderstood and loosely used term. See the correct definition of a Republic in Paragraph 4, above.)

Principle Violated by "Elective Despotism" after 1776

8. The post-1776 period witnessed gross violations by State Legislatures of the unalienable rights of victimized Individuals. In Virginia, for example, Jefferson protested vigorously against the Legislature's acts of tyranny by The Majority, stating: "An elective despotism was not the government we fought for ("Notes on The State of Virginia," 1782; emphasis Jefferson's). Misconduct in this period by The Omnipotent Majority in the legislatures of a number of the States was in reaction against the earlier oppressive rule by the king and his royal governors and judges. At that time, except in Massachusetts under its Constitution of 1780, there were no real State Constitutions to restrain the legislatures, which made sure that the governors and judges were without power to prohibit legislative enactments (by which the violations of unalienable rights were effected). The New Hampshire Constitution, based on this pattern, was not adopted until 1784 after a Constitutional Convention was successful in framing one acceptable to the people--several earlier conventions having been unsuccessful. Other States did not follow suit for a number of years, some not for decades.

"The Excesses of Democracy"

9. This type of tyranny, by Omnipotent Majority, is always possible under any Democracy as a form of government. This is what The Framers and Ratifiers of the Constitution and their fellow American leaders meant when, in the 1787-1788 debates with regard to the framing and adoption of the Constitution, they denounced the 11 excesses of democracy. They were, of course, not criticizing popular government as such--for instance as it exists under the Republic of the United States featuring constitutionally limited government, as limited by the Constitution. They were, therefore, not condemning democracy in the general sense of the term--meaning merely a popular type of government. They were speaking in support of America's being a Republic, not a Democracy, as a form of government. The more general meaning of Democracy--popular government--also applies to America; but this use of the term is only confusing in any discussion, as here, of the characteristics of different forms of popular government: a Republic in contrast to a Democracy.

Federal and State Republics

10. The foregoing explains why the traditional American philosophy requires that the central (Federal) government and the State governments be Republics. (See Pars. 6-7 of Principle 5.) Each State is guaranteed the form of government of a Republic by the United States Constitution (Art. IV, Sec. 4). The foregoing also makes clear why this philosophy requires that The Majority, at any time in temporary charge of government, administer its affairs in keeping with the Constitution's limitations and for the benefit of all Individuals composing the people as a whole, meaning The Minority and all minorities as well as The Majority--not merely for the benefit of those constituting only The Majority of the moment.

The Conclusion

11. The traditional American philosophy demands that the power of The Majority be limited for the protection of The Individual's unalienable rights, for the security of Man's Liberty against Government-over-Man, in keeping with the American formula: The Majority--Limited for Liberty. “ The American Ideal of 1776, The Twelve Basic American Principles”  by Hamilton Abert Long, c1976, available at www.lexrex.com ).”

What Must Be performed:
Article II:5 of the California Constitution must be REMOVED. It is a violation of “Rule of Law” Article IV:4 and a complete severance of the Principles stated above in Chapter 12 and in all the Founder’s work.

Why do you conform, cower and fold as “person” resulting in choosing this Socialist form of government, when you have the most complete and magnificent Documents written in the history of mankind to choose from?  Just stop.

Just say so and demand that the offending Title, Subtitle, Section or whatever Regulation be Removed.  Stop the unrelenting feeding of the absent, random eating of substance of ‘soul’ by the killer shark named socialist. And if you need to, stand together as the Minority Party and refuse to sign an unconstitutional law – as you did with PPAA-health, and as you have here in the State.