Each ELECTED-Representative is failing to recognize the dichotomy between ....

Law for Temporal - mortal of homo sapiens with cognitive attributes Government versus “Spiritual Law” of God’s Law - Internal Government of conscience.  The First "Declaration of Constitutional Principle" is: "The individual component of the polity is the person, which is defined as any being consisting of or having the essential cognitive attributes of a member of the species homo sapiens [habeous corpus], including both the capacity to compete with others for the means to exercise the natural rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and the capacity to regulate its competitive actions to avoid depriving others of those rights..[soul]".  Person is also defined as: "1. An individual human being consisting of body and soul. We apply the word to living beings only, possessed of a rational nature; the body when dead is not called a person. It is applied alike to a man, woman or child. A person is a thinking intelligent being.  2. A man, woman or child, considered as opposed to things, or distinct from them. A zeal for persons is far more easy to be perverted, than a zeal for things."

In the Declaration, it is 'person' who is addressed  in "We hold these truths to be self-evident.."; AND

In obedience to God's Laws: from the 10 Commandments as the "Religion and Morality" requirement of each-one-elected-official-and-all-subparts of government at all levels of government: "Thou shalt not bear false witness" 2011 demonstrated by "There are several ways in which statutes or other official acts may be unconstitutional": "1) It may be contrary to a right guaranteed under the Constitution. 3)It may violate the provisions for the structures and procedures of government, such as the delegation of legislative or judicial powers to an executive agency in violation of the separation of powers principle of the Constitution.  6) It may not be applied in the way it was intended by those who wrote and adopted the original act. 8) It may have been intended to be applied selectively, or have come to be applied selectively, in violation of the equal protection provision of the Constitution that all laws must be applied uniformly. [also includes if this #8 is true, then unequal application of protection of "privleges and immunities" is also true.] 11) It may have never been properly adopted, or due process may not have been practiced. 12) Information needed to make a proper determination may have been withheld, or distorted in a way that is intended to mislead or which has that effect through negligence." [The Obama's Administration's statute writing, 'Standard of Operating Procedure'].

"Thou shalt not steal.": 'Steal' means: "1. To take and carry away feloniously, as the personal goods of another. To constitute stealing or theft, the taking must be felonious, that is, with an intent to take what belongs to another, and without his consent. Let him that stole, steal no more. Ephesians 4. 2. To Withdraw or convey without notice or clandestinely. They could insinuate and steal themselves under the same by submission.
3. To gain or win by address or gradual and imperceptible means. Variety of objects has a tendency to steal away the mind from its steady pursuit of any subject. So Absalom stole the hearts of the men of Israel. 2 Samuel 15.   v.i. 1. To withdraw or pass privily; to slip along or away unperceived.  Fixed of mind to fly all company, one night she stole away. From whom you now must steal and take no leave.
A soft and solemn breathing sound rose like a steam of rich distilld perfumes, and stole upon the air.

Steal's definition as verb intransitive and #3's definition, are mandatory for Social Justice of group-mind Socialism; and start from public school kindergarten throughout all aspects of State and Federally - controlled indoctrination disguised as 'education'. And in the contents of multiple-subject, actions Bills, Acts, Amendments, formation of statutes, court rulings as precedent where selection of appropriate prior judgments are determined outside of the content and intent of "The Rule of Law", and Executive Order where the President is denied his "opinion without interference" in the supreme Law contained in Article I; therefore, he writes his own definition of law or process of force and control as an E.O., which does include using the Executive Branch's Cabinet of  regulation-writing, process absent regard for our Supreme Law. Stealing the 'mind' is more than felonious - and is a greater crime than murder with intent; torture and all other evils of man's nature.

“The Law is good if a man use it lawfully. Knowing this, that the law is not made for a righteous* man, but for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and mothers, for manslayers,...for liars,..and if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine..(I Timothy 1:8-15)..". In our Constitutional Principles, this part of Timothy is stated as: "The natural rights of persons are inalienable, preceding the social contract* and the constitution, and persons may not be deprived of them even with their consent, since they do not have the power to surrender those rights, and therefore do not have the power to delegate the deprivation of those rights to others.".

There is no earthly judge, person, attorney, legislator of any member of cognitive homo sapiens who is able to over-rule the "..belief in the being and perfections of God, in the revelation of his will to man,.." as "religion"; with: " also true godliness or piety of life, with the practice of all moral duties. It therefore comprehends theology, as a system of doctrines or principles, as well as practical piety; for the practice of moral duties without a belief in a divine lawgiver,..."Morality".

 "Majority" refers to age of legal vote as well as greater number with 'right of..' . Here is the Constitutional Principle: "Disablement of all rights other than the rights of majority may only be done by due process for individuals, not by legislation." AND "The only rights which may be disabled by default or by statute for an entire class of persons are the rights of majority, and those disabilities of minority, ... . All other rights must be disabled individually, by due process of law, and then only to the extent that is determined necessary to avoid infringing on the rights of others.".  


"Majority rights" means ": The traditional American philosophy teaches that The Majority must be strictly limited in power, and in the operation of government, for the protection of The Individual's God-given, unalienable rights proclaimed in the Declaration of Independence and, therefore, of the rights of The Minority--of all minorities. .. The protection provided by this principle applies fundamentally, of course, in favor of a minority of one: The Individual. No majority, however great even all of the people but one Individual--may properly infringe, or possess the power to infringe, the rights of any minority, however small--even a minority of a lone Individual. ..America a Republic--Not a Democracy--In Form of Government--So As to Limit Effectively The Majority To Protect the Individual 4. Therein lies the reason why the American leaders who framed and ratified the United States Constitution in 1787-1788 chose, for America's form of government, that of a Republic and not a Democracy. ..("12. The Majority - Limited for Liberty" in http://lexrex.com/enlightened/AmericanIdeal/yardstick/pr12.html ).".

Each Representative fails to uphold their Oath of Office to  “The Rule of Law” results in anti-laws(as whole or Section); and when moved forward for signature into law, causes the extinguishment of our Unique in Mankind’s History of The Declaration of Independence originating from God’s Laws and Promised delivered in the Application of God’s Law through Constitutional Law.**

"..and to sacrifice itself for the greater good of the polity as a whole or for their common posterity. The polity or society, is created by the *social contract, in which persons agree to join together for mutual benefit and defense, and to regulate their behavior to avoid forms of competition which are destructive of social coherence and effectiveness, such as violence, deception (National Defense Act's "Threat" "no matter who"), or collusion, or tho infringe on the rights of others."

Two Important principles: “In a Constitutional republic, the constitution is the SUPREME LAW, superior to ALL OTHER public acts, whether by officials or private citizens. Any statute, regulation, executve order, or court ruling which is INCONSISTENT with that SUPREME LAW And Not DERIVED from it IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL and NULL and VOID from INCEPTION.” .  That means the Whole Content of Bill, Act, Statute, Executive order, court ruling. The Principle does not lend itself to choosing which part of Adam and Eve’s Apple you take a bit from; or which “precedent” you decide and the judge adjudicates upon!!!   AND                                                                                                                                    
"An unconstitutional statute is not a law, no matter how vigorously it may be enforced. Enforcement does not make what is enforced the law. What is enforced is a  regime. In a constitutional republic, the law and the regime should coincide. If they do not, the regime is not law but anti-law.

Each Representative which allows the anti-law (section or whole) to become law, allows the government substructure to enacted, define, write, inspect, enforce, adjudicate, and punished via the underling, 2600, appointed and hired, with bias of Union-defined government, employee, as regulation at Departments of Federal and State levels; without consent of “We the People”. Each Representative also fails --- Any act performed by an agent of government which is unconstitutional is illegal, and while performing that act the person ceases to be an agent of government or to have any official status, regardless of what trappings of office or color of law he may project. It is also almost certainly a deprivation of the civil rights of someone, and therefore also a violation of one or more of the constitutional criminal laws against doing so."  "Any citizen who becomes aware of an illegal or unconstitutional act of an apparent official, which is a criminal deprivation of rights, has the duty to

One Act or Bill, not stopped becomes a snowball, avalanche of government in perpetuity which removes “We the People” - elected or not - from their unalienable rights of life, liberty, and Pursuit of happiness.

Please Do Not continue to debate habeous corpus or "body" absent "soul". It is unlawful in The Bible, in our Declaration, and in our Constitution.  It is that 'tickling of your conscience' stating in its very, very quiet nature: This is Wrong!