Saturday, June 10, 2017

Learning our Holy Living Trinity in our Three Sacred Documents: President Adams, "A Government of Laws and Not of men"

Americans of God and nation First, before our Lives, fortunes and our sacred Honor, the following will clarify The Holy Living Trinity in our Three Sacred Documents under attack as a Constitutional-Person's Mind/ Heart/ Will-Conscience, composing the UNION of ONE PEOPLE by Matt 4's spirit of the devil, few men rulers over the collective people, 24/7 deceit of lie, steal and murder of our Nation's Mind, Heart, Will-Conscience = Holy Spirit Is TRUTH :
"Laws of Nature": "All men are born equally free. The Rights they possess at their births are equal, and of the same kind. Some of those Rights are alienable, and may be parted with for an equivalent. Others are unalienable and inherent, and of that importance, that no equivalent can be received in exchange. Sometimes we shall mention the surrendering of a power to controul our Natural Rights, which perhaps is speaking with more precision, than when we use the expression of parting with Natural Rights--but the same thing is intended. Those rights which are unalienable, and of that importance, are called the rights of conscience. We have duties, for the discharge of which we are accountable to our Creator and benefactor, which no human power can cancel. What those duties are, is determinable by right reason, which may be, and is called, a well informed conscience. What this conscience dictates as our duty, is so; and that power which assumes a controul over it, is an usurper; for no consent can be pleaded to justify the controul, as any consent in this case is void. The alienation of some rights, in themselves alienable, may be also void, if the bargain is of that nature, that no equivalent can be received. Thus, if a man surrender all his alienable rights, without reserving a controul over the supreme power, or a right to resume in certain cases, the surrender is void, for he becomes a slave; and a slave can receive no equivalent. Common equity would set aside this bargain." - In Convention of Delegates from the several towns of Lynn, Salem, Danvers, Wenham, Manchester, Gloucester, Ipswich, Newbury-Port, Salisbury, Methuen, Boxford, and Topsfield, holden by adjournment at Ipswich, on the twenty-ninth day of April, one thousand seven hundred and seventy-eight.  Peter Coffin Esq; in the Chair.  It is 5 years before the end of the Revolution. Read it at The Esses Result .  ["Natural, a. consonant, derived from Nature m., "a word that comprehends all the works of God; the universe"; Right(s) a., "In morals and religion, just; equitable; accordant to the standard of truth and justice or the will of God. That alone is right in the sight of God, which is consonant to his will or law; this being the only perfect standard of truth and justice."] Essex County is the home of "Boston Gazette and Country Journal" of March 12, 1770 and is the location of the murder of 4 18-19 year old young men by the British soldiers housed in private homes.
PRE-CI'SION, n. [s as z. Fr. from L. præcisio.]  Exact limitation; exactness; accuracy. Precision in the use of words is a prime excellence in discourse; it is indispensable in controversy, in legal instruments and in mathematical calculations. Neither perspicuity nor precision should be sacrificed to ornament.
PER-SPI-CU'I-TY, n. [Fr. perspicuité; L. perspicuitas, from perspicio.] 1. Transparency; clearness; that quality of a substance which renders objects visible through it. [Little used.] – Brown.

2. Clearness to mental vision; easiness to be understood; freedom from obscurity or ambiguity; that quality of writing or language which readily presents to the mind of another the precise ideas of the author. Perspicuity is the first excellence of writing or speaking."  PPAA, a.k.a., ACA is government of man, repudiating Government of Laws/ Truth of God, as a precise example of arbitrary, mandatory perspicuity, obscureness of evidence demonstrating  1. Darkness; want of light.; 3. Darkness of meaning; unintelligibleness; as the obscurity of writings or of a particular passage" devoid Right Reason.

"The WHOLE is the sum of each one part. An Orange is an Orange. If the orange is peeled or quartered, it will, never again, be a WHOLE orange": Above the Right Reasons for government of Laws and not of men- President Adams, that uses precision in Right Reason
"Things equal to the same thing are equal to each other".

spirit of the devil:  "from loaves to stone"  stonie, fleshie, body's-physiology in its 5 senses absent understanding and will-conscience: Socialist communist 3 forms of government of man's human precept force and power of International Court of Man's Law: 1] Common Law:, Precedent's " The application of precedent relies on reasoning by analogy. Analogies can be neither correct nor incorrect but only more or less persuasive.."-West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved, .but DoubleThink; 2] Socialist-christian-deluded-democracy-Communist (about 2014, altered to, "new communist) ; 3] Civil Law  Please see "Only in 240 year old America God/Truth Is Law -- "Any form of Government..Destructive of these Ends": Our Eternal Living Father God Is Speaking Very Loud..." at http://declarationandconstitutionspeak.blogspot.com/2016/10/only-in-240-year-old-america-godtruth.html .

Thus, UDHR = UN delusional collective, mass people- in groups by physical and environmental characteristics with all arbitrary rules of conduct always 'written' and always void of any Oral-Common Law/ Oath that is God in Three Persons, as law of living and inanimate objects, always forbidden as a Honest Person, a man, a woman, a child, composed of a soul and a body, who constitute, and who are arbitrarily taxed, directly through the world bank-membership fees, though that cost is nowhere shared as a cost with a nation's persons,  the whole of  one people in each-one-of 193 member nations among which each-one-person/ including child who is dependent; ...
==All life's "grandeur of the highest mountain and all the kingdoms thereof" =  land, water, atmosphere demonstrated fact in certainty Agenda 21 Table of Contents, Global Warming, sustainable- tenement-rental .. condo, Papal Authority's subsidiarity's rules and regulations housing, devoid Oral - Common Law/ Oath in Pledge of Allegiance, Climate Change/ Paris Treaty, 2015-2017 NewSpeak's bipartisan Appropriation's Committee"....
== Council of Europe delusional socialist democracy = "pinnacle of the temple " , because, the Holy See/ Papal Authority- accepts temptation from the spirit of the devil, rather than Jesus who says, "You shall not tempt the Lord Your God", as NewSpeak "Observer"-man-choosing- and serving man, ecclesiastical government-over-its rites, ceremonies, creeds, forms, compulsion of conscience collective, mass people, reflecting Jewish, Muslim sharing Mohammad with Radical Jihad/ ISIS;
==and our Republic under God---Observer as a 2015 decree in edict-dictatorship from Article III to a No Law in the Declaration of Independence, "Originist", ISOLATED-Constitution of adversarial -
pre-determined-conclusion Democracy" - to  obliterate Truth that is God in Three Persons, The Three Sacred Documents, The Reformation:

Letter to President Trump 06/10/2017 - during the UN-Russian, Holy See openly sustaining, Socialist atheist  who hide behind DEM; and at the very same time, also hiding behind REP's faction, the two House Speakers of Papal Authority-Jewish-Muslim-Jihad-ISIS tribal ecclesiastical in civil government over collective, mass people who shall always be obedient and as ignorant of language and communication-knowledge as possible --- direct attack on his Constitutional Person, because in the other 192 nations, you can destroy government by destroying its leader.... but not in AMERICAN GOD IS LAW, TRUTH IN COMMON, ORAL LAW - that is  CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED IN WE THE PEOPLE --- President Trump is We the People President -- and we are our government of, by, and for each-one-person's RIGHT REASON ...unless, of course, fellow-country-person, you actually believe our Founders were not precisely who they demonstrated in fact and certainty of  Their Lives, Fortunes and sacred Honor not just then... Eternally in God's name = I AM WHO I AM!?

Regarding the Former CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED IN WE THE PEOPLE MAGISTRATE OF AMERICAN GOD IS LAW's  Director of the FBI:      Article II's Oral-Common Law/ Oath in Pledge of Allegiance - God's Two Greatest Commands upon which HANG the WHOLE LAW and the  Prophets, among whom in God's Eras of His History, include our Founders with Dr. Noah Webster's "AMERICAN DICTIONARY of the English Language...1828/ 1844" and Communication, Original Text for the Contents of Our Three Sacred Documents, Dear President Trump,  you continue right on track...even when you don't know, anymore than most at-large Americans of God and Nation First,  the very Intrinsic Connections between Those Three Sacred Documents.

When you met with at the nanoseconds of time Director of the FBI, you knew exactly and had appraised him quite correctly.... but you still gave him a benefit of doubt, a leash, if you will.  He choked himself.

NOT ONE PERSON,  among those [yellow journalists, congressional and judicial who have no intention of ever being accountable to God in our Three Sacred Documents/ Oath and] who yell 'FIRE, FIRE'  the top of their mouths directly to God's Ear, has even recognized your perception-skill (a huge strength, but equal..terrible weakness) at the human-bodies who 24/7 add their caustic fuel! [to get rid of a personality-- not "separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle each-one-person composing the WHOLE in UNION OF OUR 50 STATES, the residence of that Person(s) he knows and will never know]

Problem: former FBI, he doesn't have a name because his time is short on world-down-below there are  15 in front of him and probably a like number to follow that Truth in Trust, Job Description he has completely failed,  is and was, shared with those 15 "Intelligence" [sic] void, vain-idol-god's bigger number, 7 of which have voted on January 20, 2017, before the "hearing" meeting commenced, and in their total, swine-step of sustainable, conformity to its group-think obedience to untruth of socialist-atheist UN- hiding behind the non-existent word "DEMocrat".  Totally and completely BLIND, he cannot ever, again perceive the Truth contained in our Three Sacred Documents: For, he, they, have blasphemed TRUTH, an Universal word along with Music and for the same reasons, God, The Holy Spirit, Holy Ghost, our Father - The Eternal God - The Creator that connects  ONLY AMERICAN GOD IS LAW, THREE SACRED DOCUMENTS - REFORMATION.

Because  Jesus tells those who obey His commands in John 14, "..the world cannot receive [God-Helper], because it neither Sees, nor Knows Him...", those blind-ones who follow “spirit of the devil” cannot function in Action or Mind of Right Reason at any time, nor under any circumstance, hence, that committee becomes a farce in the name of iniquity.   With respect, You Do Need to Use, what I have seen in you and practice Rudyard Kipling's "IF" I recommend a skill called 'SOAP medical'.  It can help you find the dark cherry pits of a glass darkly, among those  "Things" at https://1828.mshaffer.com/d/search/word,thing   -- FB, Google+, Twitter

addendum: RE SOAP 7:28 PM SAME DAY 06/10/2017

RE: - my earlier email today about 'SOAP medical'.– ACA consequences
SOAP requires THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH, of whatever "powers of the mind's divisions those of 'understanding' and those of 'will' " -James Wilson,  L.L.D, Major drafter writer of the Constitution, And NO 'THING' BUT THE TRUTH; meaning you cannot SOAP 1 of the 8 to 10 toenails of that most intelligent, elephant's one leg and expect the WHOLE physiology upon which neurology, psychology, anatomy for life on land, water, atmosphere not to fall down and die; though in that Elephant's soul is loved as much as any Person's eternal soul, that includes our Founders and family's Heritage- a.k.a., Commandment 5, natural or naturalized.

I have to make this addendum because the Art and Science of American Medicine is Destroyed by binomial-decision tree, think performed by "Hospitalists- who started working at the end of 2008, before PPAA was even thought of, it was in effect, but only a few Physicians noticed, and not -one in government at-large," where unless you have money, your private physician is not allowed to see you in the hospital; and among outpatient departments and skilled nursing facilities, 'Physician Assistants,' nowhere as well educated as any RN, BSN, PHN of which I am one of years in Visiting Nursing.

I am witness to the mis-use of SOAP by "scatter" the organs, especially mind/ heart/ will, as far apart from each other as possible.   Both Hospitalists and Physician Assistants supreme goal for PPAA (say it out loud), a.k.a.,  ACA (but the word 'care' is extinct),  is to determined, solely,  the "acceptable, billable DRG" with always present, binomial, decision tree, 'yes is no, no is yes, if we say so' arbitrary rules of conduct-force.  Never under any circumstance, THE WHOLE Person's soul/ mind/ heart/ will-conscience connection to those 'parts of the WHOLE ART AND SCIENCE that is Diagnosis and Treatment' intrinsic to body's physiology upon which that same neurology, psychology, anatomy depend for the same land, water, atmosphere and all the connections thereof.

The consequences of PPAA's blasphemy of the Holy Spirit are immense; and because most of you have no complicated acute and chronic with the loss of life, liberty and pursuit of Happiness that occurs to each-one-person, refusing to obey God supreme Law of the Land - [16Am Jur 2d., Sec. 155], added to the absolute face and evidence that 3 parts of that over thousand pages of Untruth are hiding behind a vain-idol-god's bigger number of both Article III judges and $$$.  ACA IS NOT THREE SACRED DOCUMENTS AND THEREFORE, FRAUD BREECH OF CONTRACT IN SUPPRESSION OF ORAL, COMMON LAW-OATH/ TRUTH.:
"Since the constitution is intended for the observance of the judiciary as well as other departments of government and the judges are sworn to support its provisions, the courts are not at liberty to overlook or disregard its commands or counteract evasions thereof, it is their duty in authorized proceedings to give full effect to the existing constitution and to obey all
constitutional provisions irrespective of their opinion as to the wisdom or the desirability of such
provisions and irrespective of the consequences, thus it is said that the courts should be in our
alert to enforce the provisions of the United States Constitution and guard against their
infringement by legislative fiat or otherwise in accordance with these basic principles, the rule is fixed that the duty in the proper case to declare a law unconstitutional cannot be declined and must be performed in accordance with the delivered judgment of the tribunal before which the validity of the enactment it is directly drawn into question. If the Constitution prescribes one rule and the statute the another in a different rule, it is the duty of the courts to declare that the
Constitution and not the statute governs in cases before them for judgment.” [16Am Jur 2d.,
Sec. 155:, emphasis added] 
Please read Justice Scalia's "DISSENT". There were only 4 Justices of our Three Sacred Documents, not enough to be supreme to that vain-idol-god's 5 judges, 2 of whom had voted before PPAA enter their computers - and two of whom, have histories of never God the Creator,  Timothy I:1 "..I am well aware 'that  the Law  is admirable'--provided one makes a lawful use of it; he must keep in mind that no law is ever made for honest people, but for the lawless and insubordinate, for the impious and the sinful, for the irreverent and the profane, ...immoral persons,...liars, perjurers, and whatever else is Contrary (Article IV) to sound doctrine as laid down by that glorious gospel of the blessed God with which I  [We the People]  have been entrusted.
"..The Court today decides to save a statute Congress did not write. It rules that what the statute declares to be a requirement with a penalty is instead an option subject to a tax. And it changes the intentionally coercive sanction of a total cut-off of Medicaid funds to a supposedly noncoercive cut-off of only the incremental funds that the Act makes available.The Court regards its strained statutory interpretation as judicial modesty. It is not. It amounts instead to a vast judicial overreaching. It creates a debilitated, inoperable version of health-care regulation that Congress did not enact and the public does not expect. It makes enactment of sensible health-care regulation more difficult, since Congress cannot start afresh but must take as its point of departure a jumble of now senseless provisions, provisions that certain interests favored under the Court’s new design will struggle to retain. And it leaves the public and the States to expend vast sums of money on requirements that may or may not survive the necessary congressional revision.The Court’s disposition, invented and atextual as it is, does not even have the merit of avoiding constitutional difficulties. It creates them. The holding that the Individual Mandate is a tax raises a difficult constitutional question (what is a direct tax?) that the Court resolves with inadequate deliberation. And the judgment on the Medicaid Expansion issue ushers in new federalism concerns and places an unaccustomed strain upon the Union. Those States that decline the Medicaid Expansion must subsidize, by the federal tax dollars taken from their citizens, vast grants to the States that accept the Medicaid Expansion. If that destabilizing political dynamic, so antagonistic to a harmonious Union, is to be introduced at all, it should be by Congress, not by the Judiciary.The values that should have determined our course today are caution, minimalism, and the understanding that the Federal Government is one of limited powers. But the Court’s ruling undermines those values at every turn. In the name of restraint, it overreaches. In the name of constitutional avoidance, it creates new constitutional questions. In the name of cooperative federalism, it undermines state sovereignty.The Constitution, though it dates from the founding of the Republic, has powerful meaning and vital relevance to our own times: The constitutional protections that this case involves are protections of structure. Structural protections—notably, the restraints imposed by federalism and separation of powers—are less romantic and have less obvious a connection to personal freedom than the provisions of the Bill of Rights or the Civil War Amendments. Hence they tend to be undervalued or even forgotten by our citizens. It should be the responsibility of the Court to teach otherwise, to remind our people that the Framers considered structural protections of freedom the most im-portant ones, for which reason they alone were embod-ied in the original Constitution and not left to later amendment. The fragmentation of power produced by the structure of our Government is central to liberty, and when we destroy it, we place liberty at peril. Today’s decision should have vindicated, should have taught, this truth; instead, our judgment today has disregarded it.For the reasons here stated, we would find the Act invalid in its entirety.  We respectfully dissent:" Justices Thomas, Alito, Kennedy who will change his vote at the next of several hundred, Article III's enjoining the UN-Papal Authority's delusional-"originist", ISOLATED constitutional-adversarial, person is always dishonest until proven otherwise by UDHR's Article 19 Opinion without certainty, always doubt and totally dependent upon whose mouth is yelling, synonym Probability is 0% of Truth, repudiation of the contents of the Three Sacred Documents.

THIS 'DISSENT', like so many other's since 1932 Justice Brandeis, suffers from serving the spirit of the devil's control and manipulation of man-serving and choosing-man, father evil-father lie, that is never forgiven either in this world or the world-to-come/ heaven, thus, in complete repudiation of our God and our Nation, "He who belongs to God, listens to the words [Oral, Common Law/ Oath] of God; You Do Not Listen to them, because You Do Not Belong To God'.


Please consider .... Thank Your, Fellow-Country-Person of God and Nation First, Mr. President

No comments:

Post a Comment