Monday, May 27, 2013

The Reason PPAA violates the Laws of Both Founding Documents:

Sand Diego County Federated Republican Women
June 2013 Newsletter:
The Declaration and Constitution Speak to Today’s Issues,
Cathy West, cewest246@msn.com

The Dichotomy of  “Majority Limited for Liberty” and “The Spirit is Supreme”, the Reason PPAA violates the Laws of Both Founding Documents:

Because understanding our Republic under God is essential to understanding how “Soros-Obama Lucifer Alinsky, a.k.a Modern Marxism,-Sharia-Man’s Law (OSR)[1]”, has allowed so much of our Constitution-Person, become eradicated, here are some topics already covered: Article II and VI Oath of Office with “Religion and Morality” (02/13); The Second Amendment with the Constitutional Principles of Militia and the right of the People, themselves to take Arms to Defend the Laws of Both Founding Documents (03/13); The myth of “impregnable wall, - Republic under God-, between church and state with state transformed into the Obama Socialist Regime, OSR (04/13)and the handout from Hamilton A. Long’s 1976, “The Twelve Basic American Principles, No. 12 The Majority Limited for Liberty” (www.lexrex.com).

Benghazi’s “Stand down order”  is a violation of Article I:8, clause 15: “To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions, which also means “An attack on the rights of another; infringement or violation.”.

It was also, 54 days before the “consent of the governed” occurred, a demonstration of the importance of majority as collective mass people, filling-in dots on ballots, and forbidden “Information needed to make a proper determination was withheld and distorted in a way that was, and is intended to mislead or which has that effect through the crime of negligence [2]: “If you don’t vote for Obama, you will lose your Medicare.”.  If you don’t vote for Obama, you will loss your [tax-paying citizen’s] Grant money for college.”[3]; and

Both are inseparably connected by “One Person Protected in his Unalienable Natural Rights: Separate and equal station of each person’s “The Spirit/Soul is Supreme” accountable to God and entitlement to the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God; all laws in the Federated Equilateral Triangle can be traced back to the Laws Both Founding Documents – the protection of One Individual Person from government:

“In our constitutional republic, the Declaration, therefore Constitution, are the supreme law, superior to ALL other public acts, whether by officials or private citizens. ANY statute, regulation, executive order, or court ruling [Article III Judiciary], Ordinances, Homeowners Association, Rental Agreements, which is Inconsistent with that supreme law and Not Derived from it is Unconstitutional and Null and Void From Inception.” [2]

“An unconstitutional statute is not a law, no matter how vigorously it may be enforced. Enforcement does not make what is enforced the law. What is enforced is a regime. In our constitutional republic, the law and the regime should coincide. If they do not, the regime is not law but anti-law.”.[2]

This is the dichotomy of  “Majority Limited for Liberty” and “The Spirit is Supreme”.

OSR’s the Majority, the sole “opinion without interference regardless of frontier”[4] based upon preconceived conclusions of modern Marxism’s Obama Lucifer Alinsky: “An organizer working in and for an open society is in an ideological dilemma to begin with, he does not have a fixed truth -- truth to him is relative and changing; everything to him is relative and changing.... To the extent that he is free from the shackles of dogma, he can respond to the realities of the widely different situations..."The means-and-ends moralists, constantly obsessed with the ethics of the means used by the Have-Nots against the Haves, should search themselves as to their real political position. In fact, they are passive — but real — allies of the Haves…. The most unethical of all means is the non-use of any means..”.[1]

Since 2009, the ‘OS-Anti-law Regime’ declares that since church cannot mix with state; and Person as individual does not exist; unless the state requires that individual to conform and meld into the subservient, collective mass people- robo-think-Boolean logic-group; then the state, OSR, has full right to make any laws it desires and declare that the state religion: “atheist-secular-Sharia-Man’s law is supreme to God’s law, Person’s accountability as One to God, personal “Religion and Morality”, and protection from the Laws of Both Founding Documents. OSR demonstrates their  “prime truth that all evils are caused by the exploitation ..” – even though Truth is relative.

Laws of Nature are re-defined or changed: “The Whole of the polity, society, is Not the sum of each one part.” and “Things do not have to equal the same thing - to be equal to each other.” and “Inanimate object ‘number’ is the decision-maker for that which is sacred or right and that which is profane or wrong.”.

The 1789 Ratified Constitution of the United States Must go to court before being ALLOWED to be the Article VI supreme law of the Land; but

Because of ‘number’, inanimate and living objects, and man’s law stated in the “UN Charter - Declaration of Human Rights”-with Soros Open Society’s-EPA/E.O’s. “Sustainable life” resulting from too much Carbon, Hydrogen, Nitrogen, and Oxygen; people as collective-groups [5] and the 1961 principle of law named “precedent” [6], the OSR can write and pass any law it desires, irregardless of the Laws of Both Founding Documents; and these laws can be created, both in the presence and full knowledge of, and absent, Congress [7]; and completely absent any knowledge of “We the people in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice...; for

Unless the Constitutional Person is eliminated, the OSR-state cannot function as the force of subservience, control; and “..Any Democracy, either Representative or Direct, does not even recognize the existence of any unqualified rights of The Individual, much less his possessing God-given, unalienable rights as conceived by the American philosophy. A Democracy in America, as a form of government, would therefore provide no protection for these rights. Under a Democracy, Man is considered to have only qualified privileges permitted by The Majority in control of government and revocable by it at any time. This spells Rule by Omnipotent Majority, with The Individual and The Minority as well as all minorities victimized at the pleasure of The Majority, without limit and without any legal basis for objection or practical remedy.”.(H.A. Long ; ibid 1st paragraph)

One Example: PPAA, Patient Protection and Affordable Act Is Not Properly Adopted: Under Article IV, Republican Form of Government,  including invasion meaning “An attack on the rights of another; infringement or violation.”[2], “created by a written Constitution--adopted by the people and changeable (from its original meaning) by them only by its amendment--with its powers divided between three separate Branches: Executive, Legislative and Judicial. In a Republic, the whole system is designed primarily to protect The Individual's unalienable rights--therefore The Minority, all minorities--against any violation by government or by others. As the Declaration of Independence expresses this American goal of safeguarding these rights, the people form their governments "to secure these rights"--to make and keep them secure. No majority, however great even all of the people but one Individual--may properly infringe, or possess the power to infringe, the rights of any minority, however small--even a minority of a lone Individual.”. (H.A. Long)

Solely the “majority number” of Congress-members utilized Article I:7, Clause 2 as anti-law: That majority of Homo Sapiens acted completely absent “Reason: The cause, ground, principle or motive of any thing said or done; that which supports or justifies a determination, plan or measure.  A faculty of the mind by which it distinguishes truth from falsehood, and good from evil, and which enables the possessor to deduce inferences from facts or from propositions.”.   There Is No Minor Number in Representative Government Present: Not one individual, “elected We the People”, Republican and 37 Democratic Members of the House Refused To Sign PPAA.

There was No Agreement to the Bill PPAA. It should never have gone to the President’s desk for signature into Federal Law.[7]

Four “Justices-We the People” of the Supreme Court declared PPAA unconstitutional.  We the People, on at least three separate occasions, refused Universal health care, a.k.a PPAA, this Anti-law Act against every American in the United States of America.

Americans who voted for those Republican Representatives in Congress, including the 37 Democrats, also did not sign or give their ‘consent to govern’ to PPAA.

:PPAA in inconsistent and not derived from either of the Laws of Declaration or Constitution[2]; for life in liberty is exterminated.  All Americans, regardless of health status, shall by coercion of “fine”, from each person’s 2000 plus hours of work-earnings, for refusal to conform the the “redistribution of money for the “means to the end”[1] of 100% force and control of 100% of the prodcution, distribution, including statisical anaysis by diagnosis-Related-Groupings [8], to determine if and how ill shall or shall not receive what degree of care — regardless of the nature’s law of anatomy, physilogy, neurology of the body attached to the Person, while 100% absent any recongition of the Soul of that person; for Soul is not involved in the Ethical theory “utilitarianism to allocate scarce healthcare resources”. Utilitarian maintains that the moral righness of an action is determined by its consequences[4], i.e because Preconceived conclusions regarding “opinon without interference regardless of fromtier” man absent God’s Laws. [4]

In the anti-law, world of OSR, violations of the law do not have to exist.  The presence or absence of a “patient” is not necessary for “an individual awaiting or under medical care and treatment;  the recipient of any of various personal services.”.

PPAA is unconstitutional, and therefore any official, any level of government utilizing PPAA is an “Act performed by an agent of government which is unconstitutional is illegal, and while performing that act the person ceases to be an agent of government or to have any official status, Regardless.. of what trappings of office or color of law he may project.  It is also almost certainly a deprivation of the civil rights of someone, and therefore also a violation of one or more of the constitutional criminal laws against doing so.” [2] It is contrary to Amendments 9, 10, 14.

PPAA violate the provisions for the structures and procedures of government, delegation of legislative or judicial powers to an executive agency in violation of the separation of powers principle of the Constitution [2].  PPAA neglects “Affordable”: - Debt per tax paying citizen is $148,170, and the rights to work absent coercion of conformity: a Constitutional Person Shall Prove he is not a criminal before being allowed to work in any profession in health care field: Section 6201: Nationwide...National and Statewide Background Checks on ..Patient Access Employees of Long Term Care Facilities”.  Michael Connelly, Constitutional Attorney, US Justice Foundation, in 2009, the Only Person who read every word of the orginal Bill, states “It is the largest shift of tax payer resources to one Branch of government, Executive, in the history of the United States.”.

PPAA involved the operation of the Executive Branch of government outside its constitutional jurisdiction.[2]  The Executive Branch of Government is not involved in the production and distribution of the goods for the provision of Ill patients or even healthy individual’s needs.

PPAA is intended to be applied selectively in violation of the equal protection provision of the Constitution [2]and “Separate and Equal Station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle all the people...unalienable Natural Rights which includes the Liberty to choose Not to be involved... and therefore not “Fined” for refusing to be involved: “Elected We the People and their Staffs; SEIU members and their Administration and some States are exempted from participation.  Congress likes to be called Congressmen because they have forgotten they are just “Elected Representative-We the People” – not better, nor worse as are ALL Constitutional Persons – including the Anti-law-man sitting in the Office called President.

Proper notice of PPAA has never been accomplished in the history of this Anti-law[2] against ALL the People of the United States of America; for “utilitarianism of allocation of scarce resources” made more scarce due directly to “Numbers” controlled by the Executive Branch is inherently unlawful.  The government is using the earnings of working people and loans from other nations, to provide a care level not achieved since Johnson and Medicare..A large mistake is now a humongous disaster...for there will be no quality care...There is no knowledge, wisdom, or Truth in the changes in care which have already occurred under the distortions that PPAA perpetrates.

The ‘reason’, absent by Justice Robert’s action to “help” PPAA, is from the concept of “Precedent”. Since about 1968, “The idea that like cases should be treated alike is anchored in the assumption that one person is the legal equal of any other,” grew into one of the axioms to justify ‘precedent’[6] as more superior in adjudication versus Constitutional construction using the Laws of the Original Documents: “On every question of construction, [let us] carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or invented against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed.”–Thomas Jefferson

Precedent is the heart and intensity absent logic for determining content of what PART or portion of a case, will be ALLOWED to be adjudicated among government officials, attorney generals, judges, and agency directors, among the mis-construed, Eleventh Amendment, because very, very few among “We the People” have ever had ‘reason’ to access the ‘reason’ for ‘Precedent’; but ‘precedent’ is the “Supreme Law-secular, often Sharia, and often absent ‘reason’ in knowledge, wisdom for Truth”, courts utilize for determination of “justice”.

Precedent is so completely removed from the Laws of Both Founding Documents, that attorneys cringe at the thought of court; ‘lets the games begin’ has become the rule of law; and so often used, that when PPAA arrived in court, except for the Four Justices who could understand the Laws of the Founding Documents—or at least the Constitution;  Justice Roberts didn’t eve bother to read the sophistry contained it PPAA’s Title; and two of the Justices, Sotomeyer and Kagan, already had their verdicts before PPAA enter the stairs of the building with Bas Relief of Lady Justice’s blindfold and balance in law.

Actually, the Four Justices who threw-out PPAA were, in terms of Article IV Republican Form of government with protection from invasion and number; after considering Roberts “precedent” supreme to 1789 Law; and adding Sotomeyer/Kagan’s “preconceived conclusion” by “opinion without interference regardless of frontier”, subtracting the two who should have recuse themselves, leaves makes the Four justices the majority not the minority number. In reason of Truth in Justice the actual Supreme Court Adjudication was 4 to 3 with two recuse by “Oath of Office” in “Religion and Morality”.

You see, Truth and Justice in Law, because of “majority absent ‘reason’ and based in “opinion without interference regardless of frontier” from the UN Charter, The Universal Declaration of Human Rights-connections to sustainable-GW-PPAA-E.O’s Oxygen, Carbon, Nitrogen, Hydrogen. absent Congress law, eliminated the Laws of Both Founding Documents.

Congress, and many among the Several States, also aid and assist “the majority to be the rule of law over sacred-right and profane-wrong; for they adamantly refuse to recognize, as does Article III Judiciary, to state, on the Floors of those legislative areas, that IF ONE SECTION OR PART OF A BILL IS NOT CONSISTENT AND NOT DERIVED FROM BOTH OF THE SUPREME LAWS OF THE LAND, then THE ENTIRE BILL IS ANTI-LAW.  The Founders and early years, those Bills which could not pass Constitutionality – did not go to “committee” or “committees” – they went to the “traditional, common sense, religion and morality, circular file named the incinerator”.

“But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariable the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their RIGHT, it is their DUTY, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. ..” means Article II:4.

Of course it won’t solve everything, but because “The Whole is the sum of each one of its parts; and “Things equal to the same thing are equal to each other.”; and because “..and ALL CIVIL OFFICERS OF THE UNITED STATES, SHALL BE REMOVED FROM OFFICE UPON IMPEACHMENT FOR, AND CONVICTION OF ..” it is The Only Way, in the name of our Lord God to whom We are Accountable and in the name of the posterity of our children’s children, We Must Not Fail In Our Duty.

Resources and Comments:
1. “Rules for Radicals”; Saul Lucifer Alinsky, 1971; http://www.crossroad.to/Quotes/communism/alinsky.htm

2. “There are several ways in which statutes or other official [or private] acts may be uncontistuinal:
#12; http://constitution.org/consprin.txt

3. This Founding Father’s Patriot is a “Precinct Worker” who knocks on doors.  Actual conversations and well reported among FB and internet sites..  Never the medica though; nor the Republican Progressives of “You must be obedient to the majority. They have the numbers. They have the power.”.  Never, ever use the words “unconstitutional”; but solely “Int’s the Laws! Stated with indignation that anyone would question and refuse to conform to Anti-law.  Right now, the Republican Party of the seceded from the Union, Official Socialist State of California, and the Republican National Committe are being ruled-over by a number and FACTION: “Progressive”.  OSR is dancing in the streets, because the Republican Party of Principle will DIE...very, very, soon.  Though with Civil and Criminal Benghazi Holder IRS and Agenda 21 via E.O. to all cities in the USA combined with the probably Federal Reserve of Mortgage lending infamy - it’s not a part of the Republican form of government, $25,000 Loan money shall be given, by Cities in the USA, for the Purpose of the purchase of private property.  That’s about as fraudulent as you can get, but wait...there’s the “continuation money” for the 94,505Federal / 29,941Executive  Levels, including PPAA - even though not-funded by the House, because the “Elected We the People” President absent his Oath of Office, did Not Sign a Budget for 3 of the last 4 years of his Socialist Anti-law Regime

4. UN Charter, WSIS “Declaration of Priniples: #4"; Nursing Ethics Part 2 Bioethical theories and principles; Arlene Jech, RN, BSN,  http://ce.nurse.com/ce560/nursing-ethics-part-2-the-language-of-bioethics/ connected to “The Universal Declaration of Human Rights” - 9 Members of the Committee were: Dr. Charles Malik (Lebanon), Alexandre Bogomolov (USSR), Dr. Peng-chun Chang (China), René Cassin (France), Eleanor Roosevelt (US) - The person who would not represent the Republican form of government as sole ’representative’ of the Laws of Both Founding Documents /USA-, Charles Dukes (United Kingdom),  William Hodgson (Australia), Hernan Santa Cruz (Chile), John P. Humphrey (Canada).  You can Google them individually to learn of their non-American view of world affairs at http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/drafters.shtml
 Every member of the United Nations has been Socialist, with exceptions from America when our Representatives where Republican, to the Democratic-Liberal-Progressive Republican -Socialist Party.

 The Last Mission Statement left the UN +/- a few years after Bush Took office. It is now, solely, a statement of government-over-man determining which groups of collective people, with or without the nation they are citizens, in complete domination of all aspects of earthly life and without ever mentioning God or a Creator of the Universe, for that would be intolerance, except for the atheist-Sharia-law absent morality from mankind’s history.  18, September 2000 Millennium doesn’t require history to determine which collective group-think-all mass-people shall be included, and excluded membership.

5. . “Sustainable America: Forsaking our American Dream, From sovereign States to world governance through sustainable development”; Mary Baker, acting President of the San Diego/Orange County Chapter for the non-profit organization, Citizens Alliance for Property Rights; Non Governmental Organizations: “ In the realm of Sustainable Development, extremist ‘environmental justice’ NGOs such as the Sierra Club, and Nature Conservancy, or  a ‘social justice’ NGO like Build One America are exercising enormous influence and are demanding a restructuring of our society. These new members of civil society diminish our inalienable rights and elevate themselves as progressive arbiters and judges of the course for humanity. These NGOs are often funded by wealthy corporations and individuals who want to expand their sphere of influence. Taxpayers unwittingly fund these NGOs when States offer grants and agree to enter into public private partnerships with them.  To implement Sustainable Development via the Agenda 21 blueprint, the United Nations and its American proponents, use this new breed of civil society to its advantage” [George Soros-Obama-Gore-Kemp-Holder-proposed Gale McCarthy-Hager-Brannan]  - the EPA- E.O:  the Executive Branch of “Kingship”]
 http://www.exurbiachronicles.com/?p=839
 These Acts are completely absent, in law and in “consent of the governed” any part of the Federalist equilateral triangle of Person/family, town, county State, Federal. NGO’s include SanDag squeezed between County and State; but absent Trust in God and any Rights of Person or corporate person; and indoctrinated as part of State and federal education Departments in “Common Core curriculum” to our Posterity. I

 Global Warming is the name, not used anymore because it is Alinsky tactic ‘worn-out usefulness’; and is recognized as false science by responsible leaders and persons throughout nations of the world; for it is absurd to think than any government could “regulate” or “sustain” the Periodic Chart’s Carbon and Oxygen of all life created by God.  Except remember that Truth is Not Fixed and is relative and neither is God or His son Jesus Christ.

6. http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/precedent

7. This is said because throughout all the years from February 2009 to this date; Congress compeltely ignores tehe existence of the Laws of Both Founding documents, especially the 1789 Retified Constitution. Congress prefers to follow profane/wrong; rather than “One Person Protected in Declaration’s “separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nture’s God entite them -AXIOM upon which the entire Declaration sets stage as “The Promise”, fulfilled by the 1789 Consitution and connected through Article II and VI’s Oath of Office.  As Jesus said ‘You prefer to follow them, rather than believe in me?”.

We the People-Representatives (NOT congressmen) didn’t do this on purpose or by deviousness, it is a consequence of refusing “Religion and Morality” in the terrible misbelief that caused the Article IV Republican Form of government to become a Wall.  Church Ecclesiastics could bounce off that Article Iv:4 Wall and ignore it (also because the Fear of 501C3 completely outwieghs Faith in God); while state can take a hammer and chisle, to pound away leading to the hole which the “Soros-UN-UDHR-Obama-modern Marxist-Alinsky” could enlarge to the near, compete destruction, because of approxiamely 57 years in which Religion and morality have been forbidden in State - then Federal-indoctrination disguised as education, Public Schools - out Posterity has been refused God’s Laws in the sovereign, uniquesness of each-one’s Soul protected from OSR.

8. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diagnosis-related_group






No comments:

Post a Comment