http://www.youtube.com/user/parentalrights


Like so much of the Constitution and Declaration The statement there is nothing in the "TEXT of the Constitution" to "Protect Parental Rights" is correct 'per say' in it was not necessary to delineate in writing in 1776 to those words. Not even in English Law of George III! That is how fundamental parent's are to life, liberty, and happiness. That is also what "Religion and Morality" mean.  And that is what is missing here in this film:  the Youth who thinks that the adult is tramping on his rights when he "doesn't even know its happening"; the 'court of man's law' - unchallenged by Jefferson on Construction regarding spirit of time (obtainable through Noah Webster's 1828 American Dictionary),"trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or invented against it..." versus the Socialist 'control of and over everything' with full removal of sovereignty of person, natural rights which taken together are freedom. 


"The Declaration is not law because you can't see it. The Constitution is law because you can see it." is a quote made on 'Public Radio' during the liberal morning broadcast over a year ago. It is a repudiation of God's Law because you can't see "God's Law" in The Constitution, either.  Add to this "Every Man has a right to an opinion" which was included in the "Declaration of Principles" of the UN WSIS 12/10-12/2003's version: 

"4.

We reaffirm, as an essential foundation of the Information Society, and as outlined in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, that everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; that this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers. Communication is a fundamental social process, a basic human need and the foundation of all social organization. It is central to the Information Society. Everyone, everywhere should have the opportunity to participate and no one should be excluded from the benefits the Information Society offers."     EVERYONE, especially "Elected We the People" should read the entire statement of G. Soro's open-society because it is contained in this UN Declaration.  YOU, as your "person" of God and of this Nation Must Understand on your own, the reason "right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference", as taught to young, "X & Y generations, including the "Woodstock-older", is God's Law absent from this UN Declaration!  The absence of God's Law is a leading problem in the UN and our Nation under the Obama-Soros regime; and in the 30 year Middle East War to eradicate Israel - the wall against Islam and Sharia Law; and up until 'Obama-Clinton-et. al minions', our Nation's undying support of Israel.

It is completely against The Declaration of Independence of God's Law expressed in the first paragraph as the FIRST PREMISE of Law - even Seen With Unseen as: "..In the Course of human events..; and to assume among the  powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them,..".  You can see Nature (science) and it has laws. You can see Nature's God - but only if you have "Religion and Morality" as the ultimate foundation for human kind of the species Homo Sapiens with Cognitive Attributes who compete for life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness = natural rights.  The Declaration is "The Promise"... and The Constitution is Law in fulfilling the "Promise". Both Documents are intertwined and include The Bible and with 1620 America becoming 1776 The United States of...


"Natural rights" are repudiated in the UN Declaration because 'man's law' of the UN and Obama-Soros-Alinsky-Zeitgeist', cannot function with sovereignty and uniqueness of one person both founding Documents and The Bible teach.  Each person Is one:one with God -- it is a choice. Each Person is one on one with the United States of America which our Founders, with God's work, present on each and every page of our unique in Human Kind History of rights of One-person-one-at-a-time. It is a choice.  The choice of the UN, the Socialist-communist is 'turn away from God as Law...or obedience required of the responsibility when 'holding opinion without interference is wrong and opposite to God's Law.


That is why: George Washington's words, actions, and deeds; the first paragraph of the Declaration with 6 of 27 abuses*; the total content of The Constitution as opinion of the writer*, must be eliminated and changed in order for all our youth to be indoctrinated against the expression of God and rights of mankind in  "..for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor."

US Constitution has a large portion of "Unseen Law" aka Principle.  What is expressed as 'parent's rights' is a no-brainer for The Laws of God as written in the Constitution: Delineated in Article IV:2, 4, in The Bill of Rights and in the 14th Amendment. While the intent of Article VI in "..and all Treaties made.., was an "..imperative because they would be of no validity with respect to other nations unless the whole United States took the treaty seriously. (1954 Bricker Amendment would have protected our nation, but lost by one Senator's vote).*", the WSIS DECLARATION is so Against The Supreme Law of Our Nation...Tyranny would be the working word against this President because of his repudiation of The United States of America in supporting it.... .  

It is easy to see why "Text" of our Constitution is the "rider" word here. For if we simply loved our Nation and support its Constitution, "impeachment for high crimes and misdemeanors" would easily prevail.  God's Law
of unalienable rights because "The natural rights of persons are inalienable, preceding the social contract and the constitution, and persons may not be deprived of them even with their consent, since they do not have the power to surrender those rights, and therefore do not have the power to delegate the deprivation of those rights to others. (Declaration of Constitutional Principles by Jon Roland, Constitution Society)".  So the Treaty is absolutely Unconstitutional and therefore "anti-law" and also therefore inconsistent with unalienble rights and disobedience as a duty, required; unless of course Obama's tyranny extends to communism of forced - dictate -100% Government. 

It is scary how easy it is for too many Americans in ignorance to be fooled, lied to, and not recognize managed and sorted information meant to distort -- the young are easily susceptible especially with 'indoctrination' and coercion of grade or pass-fail as the instigators.

So, in parental rights or any action of the UN via its self-imposed "Declaration of  Principles of human kind without God's Laws for sovereignty of "person" " is a repudiation of our Nation as a Republic; and any 'person' with their right to an opinion; must also take the responsibility and consequences of tyranny against this nation that 'UN opinion' endorses and uses against person, but not group as nations of control.

* from "A Guide for Learning and Teaching The Declaration of Independence and The U.S. Constitution; Learning from Original Texts Using Classical Learning Methods of the Founders" by Joseph Andrews The Center for Teaching the Constitution; pg. 268.